Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessCraft malicious XSS payload/URL
-
ExploitLure logged-in WordPress user to trigger it
-
ExecutionScript executes in victim's authenticated session
-
ImpactSteal session tokens or forge admin actions
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Output encoding, context-aware escaping
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Execution The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires that a victim who is logged into a WordPress site running HTTP Requests Manager <= 1.3.11 interacts with attacker-controlled input - e.g. clicking a crafted link or loading an attacker-influenced page/parameter handled by the plugin (UI:R in the vector is the key limiting factor). No authentication is required of the attacker (PR:N), so the payload can be delivered by any remote party, but the script only fires in the context of the interacting user's session; maximum impact is realized when that user is a site administrator. Limiting factors: the target site must have this specific plugin installed and active at a vulnerable version, and a human must be socially engineered into triggering the payload - there is no unattended, fully automated server-side trigger. |
| Impact | This is a genuine but moderate-priority issue, not a top-tier emergency. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L, base 7.1 HIGH) indicates a network-reachable, low-complexity, unauthenticated flaw whose scope-change (S:C) reflects XSS executing in the victim's browser context across a security boundary. The critical mitigating signal in the vector is UI:R - exploitation requires a victim (typically an authenticated admin or logged-in user) to be lured into triggering the payload, so this is not self-propagating or mass-automatable. No EPSS score, CISA KEV listing, or public POC was provided in the input; the only source is a single Patchstack advisory. Exploitation status is therefore: no public exploit identified at time of analysis. The 7.1 score is driven largely by the unauthenticated vector and scope change rather than by direct system compromise - the C:L/I:L/A:L impacts are the limited, browser-session-scoped effects typical of XSS, not server-side code execution. Net: a real, patchable vulnerability worth remediating on normal cycles, but the required user interaction and the niche plugin footprint make widespread opportunistic exploitation unlikely absent targeted social engineering. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker crafts a malicious URL or injected payload targeting the HTTP Requests Manager plugin (<= 1.3.11) and lures a logged-in WordPress user - ideally an administrator - into clicking it or viewing attacker-controlled content. The script executes in the victim's authenticated browser session, enabling session/cookie theft, admin-action forgery, or injection of further malicious content. No public exploit code was identified, and successful exploitation hinges on the victim interacting with the attacker-supplied input (UI:R). |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 06, 2026
Cross-site scripting in the WordPress plugin HTTP Requests Manager affects all versions up to and including 1.3.11, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to inject script that executes in the browser of a user who interacts with attacker-controlled input (CVSS 3.1 base 7.1, AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L). No authentication is required to deliver the payload, but the script only fires when a logged-in victim - most damagingly a site administrator - is socially engineered into clicking a crafted link or loading an attacker-influenced page or parameter handled by the plugin, so this is not an unattended server-side compromise path. No confirmed active exploitation (not in CISA KEV) and no public exploit code was identified at time of analysis, making this a genuine but moderate-priority issue rather than an emergency.
RemediationAI
Patch status: no vendor-released patch was identified in the available data (no fixed version is listed by the reporter, Patchstack, and no CVE-org reference points to an updated release), so confirm the current patched version directly with the plugin vendor before assuming an update exists; per the rules of evidence, absence of a fix in this dataset is not proof that none exists. Until a fixed release is confirmed and installed, the most reliable action is to deactivate and remove HTTP Requests Manager if its functionality is not essential - the trade-off is loss of request-management and logging capability. If the plugin must stay active, restrict exposure of its administrative and front-end endpoints to trusted networks or authenticated users where possible, deploy WAF or reverse-proxy rules that filter script payloads on parameters handled by the plugin (accepting possible false positives on legitimate input), and enforce a Content-Security-Policy that blocks inline and third-party script execution to blunt successful injection. Operationally, require administrators to use a separate browser profile for untrusted links and keep admin sessions short-lived, since the attack chain depends entirely on a logged-in user interacting with attacker-supplied content; monitor the Patchstack advisory page for a patched version and reapply the update as soon as it is published.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The flaw is a classic CWE-79 improper neutralization of input during web page generation in a WordPress plugin distributed by vendor veppa (CPE cpe:2.3:a:veppa:http_requests_manager). HTTP Requests Manager is a WordPress plugin that manages and logs outbound HTTP requests from the site, and its handlers reflect user-supplied input into generated HTML without adequate output encoding or sanitization, letting injected markup escape into the response. The CVSS vector AV:N/PR:N confirms the payload can be sent by any remote, unauthenticated party over the network, while UI:R and S:C indicate the browser-side script executes in a context whose scope crosses into the victim's session on the affected site - meaning an administrator who triggers it could have actions performed with their privileges, though only after deliberate user interaction. There is no evidence of a server-side, automatically triggered injection; the plugin must be installed, active, and at a vulnerable version for the issue to exist, and the impact is bounded by the required human trigger rather than by any remote code execution or authentication bypass primitive.
Know when Http Requests Manager gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
Remote unauthenticated (AV:N/PR:N) XSS needing victim interaction (UI:R) with cross-context execution (S:C); C:L/I:L for session/content impact, A:N as XSS has no real availability impact.
Primary rating from Vendor (Patchstack).
CVSS VectorVendor: Patchstack
DescriptionCVE.org
Unauthenticated Cross Site Scripting (XSS) in HTTP Requests Manager <= 1.3.11 versions.
Executive ViewAI
An unauthenticated cross-site scripting flaw in the WordPress plugin HTTP Requests Manager, affecting all versions up to and including 1.3.11, allows an attacker to run malicious script in the browser of a logged-in user who is lured into clicking a crafted link or loading an attacker-influenced page - with a site administrator being the most valuable target. Because administrator sessions typically control users, plugins, themes and content, a successful lure could lead to full site takeover, credential theft, defacement or compromise of site visitors. No public exploit code or confirmed active exploitation has been identified, so this is a genuine but manageable exposure that warrants inventory, mitigation planning and monitoring rather than emergency escalation.
No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis; interim mitigations are to deactivate or uninstall the plugin where it is not essential, restrict WordPress administrative access to trusted networks or VPN with MFA enforced, apply WAF or reverse-proxy rules that filter script payloads in plugin-handled request parameters, enforce a strict Content Security Policy, and train administrators to avoid clicking unsolicited links that could deliver the crafted payload.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Cross-Site Scripting occurs when an application accepts untrusted data and sends it to a web browser without proper validation or encoding.
EUVD-2026-93246
GHSA-cq24-xv7g-j2h3
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB