Skip to main content

Login Lockdown EUVDEUVD-2026-93068

| CVE-2026-97308 MEDIUM
Authentication Bypass by Spoofing (CWE-290)
2026-10-06 Patchstack GHSA-hg86-gcr3-6jqr
4.8
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: Patchstack
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Reach WordPress login endpoint
  2. Delivery
    Spoof client identifier used for lockout tracking
  3. Exploit
    Bypass failed-attempt lockdown
  4. Execution
    Continue unthrottled credential brute-force
  5. Impact
    Gain unauthorized account access

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A07:2025 - Authentication Failures
ASVS 5.0
V6 - Authentication Anti-spoofing controls
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Defense Evasion

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Applies to WordPress sites running the WebFactory Login Lockdown plugin at version 2.17 or earlier where the plugin is actively used to enforce login lockout/throttling. Exploitation requires network access to the login endpoint but no authentication (PR:N) and no user interaction (UI:N). The key limiting factor is the HIGH attack complexity (AC:H): the attacker must manipulate whatever client attribute (such as a spoofable source identifier/header) the plugin uses to count and lock failed attempts, so success depends on reproducing that bypass condition reliably. Impact is bounded to defeating the lockdown control, which facilitates brute-force rather than granting direct access by itself.

Impact

This is a moderate-severity (CVSS 4.8) authentication-protection bypass in the Login Lockdown WordPress plugin, reported by Patchstack and mapped to CWE-290 (Authentication Bypass by Spoofing). The CVSS vector (AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N) indicates a network-reachable, unauthenticated issue but with HIGH attack complexity and only LOW confidentiality/integrity impact and no availability impact - consistent with defeating the plugin's lockout control rather than directly compromising the site. No EPSS score was provided in the input, the CVE is NOT on the CISA KEV list, and no public exploit code (POC) is referenced; the single reference is the Patchstack advisory. Net assessment: this is a real but secondary-priority defensive-control weakness, not a high-urgency flaw. The practical risk is amplification of credential-stuffing/brute-force attacks because the very feature meant to throttle them can be evaded; it is not itself a direct account takeover. No SSVC decision data was supplied. Prioritize patching on sites that rely on Login Lockdown as a primary brute-force defense, but it does not warrant emergency response absent exploitation signals.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker running a brute-force or credential-stuffing campaign against a WordPress login page crafts requests that evade Login Lockdown's failed-attempt tracking/lockout, allowing them to continue guessing credentials without being blocked after the configured threshold. Because exploitation is unauthenticated and network-based but marked high-complexity, it likely requires specific request manipulation (e.g., spoofing the client identity the plugin uses to count attempts). No public exploit code is identified at time of analysis.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
No patch listed yet 0.2% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 06, 2026

Authentication-protection bypass in the WebFactory Login Lockdown WordPress plugin at version 2.17 and earlier lets unauthenticated remote attackers evade the plugin's failed-login lockout by spoofing the client identifier it relies on to count and block attempts, enabling sustained credential brute-force against wp-login.php. The assessed CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N, score 4.8) confirms that no authentication or user interaction is required, while the HIGH attack complexity reflects the need to reliably reproduce the spoofing condition; the impact is bounded to defeating the throttling control rather than directly granting access. The issue is mapped to CWE-290 and was reported by Patchstack; there is no confirmed active exploitation (CISA KEV) and no public exploit identified at time of analysis.

RemediationAI

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis: the only reference supplied is the Patchstack vulnerability database entry for the plugin (https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/login-lockdown/vulnerability/wordpress-login-lockdown-plugin-2-17-bypass-vulnerability-vulnerability?_s_id=cve), which should be monitored for an updated plugin release, and administrators should apply any fixed version as soon as Patchstack or the plugin author publishes it. Until then, do not rely on the plugin's counters as the sole lockout mechanism: enforce rate limiting and temporary blocks on /wp-login.php and xmlrpc.php at the reverse proxy or WAF layer (trade-off: shared NAT or corporate egress IPs can be throttled or blocked, so use generous thresholds and allowlist critical ranges), and ensure the site's server-side logging records the true remote address rather than untrusted forwarding headers. Deploy fail2ban or an equivalent log-driven blocker against the web server's access log so lockouts are based on a server-observed source address the attacker cannot spoof (trade-off: requires log access and modest tuning to avoid false positives from monitoring or scanner traffic). If the plugin's lockout feature cannot be trusted and no other protection is in place, either restrict wp-login.php to an IP allowlist or place HTTP Basic authentication in front of it (trade-off: breaks access for users on dynamic/mobile addresses and adds a second credential prompt), or remove the plugin and replace it with an actively maintained brute-force protection that keys lockouts off a trusted attribute; simply deleting the plugin without a replacement removes the throttling control entirely and leaves WordPress defaults exposed to credential stuffing. Regardless of the control used, enforce strong unique passwords and require two-factor authentication for all accounts with login privileges, since the bypass only removes the lockout delay and does not itself defeat credential strength or a second factor.

Affected VersionsENISA

Login Lockdown n/a ≤2.17

Affected Packages

euvd login_lockdown no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The flaw is an authentication bypass by spoofing (CWE-290) affecting the Login Lockdown WordPress plugin, an anti-brute-force control that tracks failed login attempts and temporarily blocks the offending client. The affected CPE cpe:2.3:a:webfactory:login_lockdown:* indicates the entire plugin product line is in scope, with the vendor advisory bounding vulnerable releases at 2.17 and earlier. The root cause is that the plugin derives the identity used for its lockout counter from a client-controlled value (such as a spoofable source identifier or header) instead of a trusted, server-observed attribute, so an attacker who varies or forges that attribute is never aggregated into a single lockout bucket and can keep submitting credentials. The CVSS sub-score AC:H signals that the bypass is conditional and not trivially repeatable, and the low Confidentiality/Integrity impact (C:L/I:L) reflects that the bug degrades a defensive control rather than exposing data or executing code by itself. Exploitation requires only network reachability to the WordPress authentication endpoint, with PR:N and UI:N confirming no credentials and no user interaction are needed to attempt it.

Know when Login Lockdown gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (Patchstack) PRIMARY 4.8 MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
vuln.today AI 4.8 MEDIUM

Network-reachable and unauthenticated (AV:N/PR:N); AC:H because the bypass requires spoofing the attempt-tracking identifier; limited impact as it only weakens a protective control, enabling brute-force (C:L/I:L/A:N).

3.1 AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
4.0 AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (Patchstack).

CVSS VectorVendor: Patchstack

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
High
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

DescriptionCVE.org

Unauthenticated Bypass Vulnerability in Login Lockdown <= 2.17 versions.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.2%
Top 92% exploitable
Prevalence
Medium
common WordPress security plugin, widely but not universally installed
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.2%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact· derived
Medium
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

24
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +24
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy