Skip to main content

Progress Planner EUVDEUVD-2026-93063

| CVE-2026-62072 HIGH
Missing Authorization (CWE-862)
2026-10-06 Patchstack GHSA-mqg4-m7j5-x92p
8.8
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: Patchstack
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain Subscriber account on site
  2. Delivery
    Send crafted authenticated request to plugin endpoint
  3. Exploit
    Bypass missing authorization check
  4. Execution
    Perform unauthorized privileged action
  5. Impact
    Compromise site data and integrity

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V8 - Authorization Authorization checks on every request
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Privilege Escalation

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires an authenticated account at the WordPress Subscriber role or higher on a site running Progress Planner version 1.10.0 or earlier (PR:L); it is remotely reachable over the network with no user interaction. The practical limiting factor is the need for a valid account - risk is highest where open/self-service user registration is enabled, and substantially reduced on sites that restrict account creation. No special non-default plugin configuration is indicated in the available data; the condition is simply possession of a low-privilege session plus the vulnerable plugin version.

Impact

The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H, base 8.8) indicates a network-reachable, low-complexity flaw requiring only low privileges (PR:L) and no user interaction, with high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact - consistent with CWE-862 (Missing Authorization), where an already-authenticated low-level account can reach functionality it should not. The 'low privilege' requirement maps directly to the description's 'Subscriber' level, the lowest default authenticated WordPress role, which is often self-registerable, materially lowering the barrier versus an admin-only flaw. However, no EPSS score, no CISA KEV listing, and no public POC were provided in the input, so this is a high-CVSS issue with no evidence of real-world or probable near-term exploitation at time of analysis - it should be patched promptly on affected sites but does not show the active-exploitation signals that would make it an emergency. The reliance on a valid (if low-privilege) account also means it is not a mass unauthenticated internet-wide threat; realistic risk concentrates on sites that permit open user registration. KEV/EPSS absence is noted as missing data, not as evidence of safety.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker registers or obtains a low-privilege Subscriber account on a WordPress site running Progress Planner <= 1.10.0, then sends a crafted authenticated request to a plugin endpoint that fails to verify the caller's authorization. Because no user interaction is needed and attack complexity is low, the attacker can perform actions or access data reserved for higher-privilege users, with full impact to confidentiality, integrity, and availability. No public exploit identified at time of analysis.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
No patch listed yet 0.3% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 06, 2026

Broken access control in the Progress Planner WordPress plugin through version 1.10.0 allows any authenticated user holding the low-privileged Subscriber role (or higher) to reach plugin functionality they are not authorized to invoke, yielding high impact to confidentiality, integrity, and availability at a CVSS 3.1 base score of 8.8 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H). The flaw is network-reachable, requires no user interaction and no elevated privileges beyond a valid low-privilege session, and is classified as CWE-862 (Missing Authorization); risk is greatest on sites that permit open or self-service registration and materially lower where account creation is locked down. No public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis, and there is no indication of confirmed active exploitation in CISA KEV; the report originates from Patchstack. Authentication requirements are confirmed from the assessed vector, which carries PR:L, so exploitation is authenticated but does not require administrative access.

RemediationAI

No vendor-released patch version is identified in the available data, so the first action is to check the Patchstack advisory (https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/progress-planner/vulnerability/wordpress-progress-planner-plugin-1-10-0-broken-access-control-vulnerability?_s_id=cve) and the plugin's WordPress.org release feed for a version above 1.10.0 and upgrade to that release; because the affected range is stated as '<= 1.10.0', any confirmed later release should resolve the missing authorization check, but do not treat an unverified version number as the fix until the vendor confirms it. If no fixed release is yet available, deactivate and remove the Progress Planner plugin until a patched version ships - the trade-off is loss of whatever progress/onboarding functionality it provides, but that is the only fully reliable control given a missing authorization check. Where the plugin must remain enabled, close the privilege gap: disable open registration in WordPress (Settings > General > 'Anyone can register' off) and audit existing Subscriber accounts, since the vulnerability is gated on holding a low-privilege session and self-service signup is the primary path an outside attacker would use to obtain one; the trade-off is that legitimate site members can no longer self-enroll and must be created manually. Additionally, restrict or block the plugin's REST and admin-ajax endpoints at the web application firewall or reverse proxy (allow only expected roles/IP ranges) and add monitoring for Subscriber-level requests to Progress Planner routes, though WAF rules are signature-dependent and may be bypassed by parameter or path variation. Rotate any credentials or secrets the plugin stores or exposes, since high confidentiality impact is assessed, and keep WordPress role assignments least-privileged in the interim.

Affected VersionsENISA

Progress Planner n/a ≤1.10.0

Affected Packages

euvd progress_planner no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The issue sits in the Progress Planner plugin for WordPress, a site-progress/onboarding management extension installed on self-hosted WordPress installations; the sole CPE entry, cpe:2.3:a:progress_planner:progress_planner:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*, confirms a single vendor/product pair with all versions treated as affected in the range. The root cause class is CWE-862 Missing Authorization, meaning a request handler (typically a registered REST route, admin-ajax action, or admin-post endpoint exposed by the plugin) performs its operation without an adequate capability or nonce/authorization check, so the plugin's own authentication gate is absent even though the caller must still be logged in. In WordPress, authorization is normally enforced through capability checks such as current_user_can() against roles like manage_options; a Subscriber has essentially no capabilities beyond reading, so any privileged action reachable by a Subscriber indicates a missing or incorrectly scoped check rather than a flaw in WordPress core. The Patchstack tags 'WordPress', 'Authentication Bypass', and 'WordPress Plugin' describe this pattern of low-privilege privilege escalation into plugin-controlled functionality. Because the assessed vector is PR:L with no dependency on non-default configuration, the practical precondition is simply possession of any valid low-privilege session plus a vulnerable plugin install.

Know when Progress Planner gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (Patchstack) PRIMARY 8.8 HIGH
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 8.8 HIGH

Network-reachable missing-authorization flaw exploitable by a self-registerable Subscriber account, so AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N; description implies full unauthorized access, hence high C/I/A.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (Patchstack).

CVSS VectorVendor: Patchstack

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

DescriptionCVE.org

Subscriber Broken Access Control in Progress Planner <= 1.10.0 versions.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

A high-severity authorization flaw in the Progress Planner WordPress plugin (versions through 1.10.0) allows any user with a basic Subscriber account to invoke plugin functionality reserved for higher-privileged roles, exposing site data and configuration to tampering or disruption. Because exploitation only requires a valid low-privilege login, any organization running the plugin on sites that allow open or self-service registration faces the greatest exposure, with potential compromise of confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the affected site. Leadership should care because this is a widely deployed third-party component with no vendor patch yet, and the attack path is reachable over the network without user interaction.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations: deactivate or remove the Progress Planner plugin (through version 1.10.0) on internet-facing sites, disable open/self-service registration, restrict or remove Subscriber and higher accounts that are not strictly required, enforce least-privilege role assignments, apply WAF or reverse-proxy rules to block unauthorized plugin endpoint access, and monitor WordPress audit logs for anomalous low-privilege administrative activity.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.3%
Top 75% exploitable
Prevalence
Low
niche WordPress productivity plugin, modest install base
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.3%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

44
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +44
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy