Skip to main content

Feehi CMS EUVDEUVD-2026-92783

| CVE-2026-95263 HIGH
Improper Access Control (CWE-284)
2026-10-05 mitre GHSA-p8wc-cj6h-9g96
7.2
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: mitre
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Authenticate as low-privilege backend admin
  2. Delivery
    Access user-update flow with administrator-update permission
  3. Exploit
    Submit super-admin password change without old password
  4. Execution
    Log in as built-in super administrator
  5. Impact
    Full CMS administrative takeover

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V8 - Authorization Access control enforcement
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Defense Evasion

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Requires a pre-existing authenticated backend administrator account that holds the administrator-update permission in Feehi CMS 2.1.1; exploitation targets the user-management update flow, which fails to protect the built-in super administrator account and does not require that account's current/old password. Limiting factors: the attacker must already have valid privileged backend access (PR:H - escalation from a lower admin to super admin, not unauthenticated access), the specific administrator-update permission must be granted, and the target must be running the vulnerable 2.1.1 release; no victim user interaction is needed.

Impact

The input CVSS of 7.2 (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H) frames this as a High-severity but privilege-gated flaw: AV:N and AC:L make exploitation trivial once access exists, but PR:H confirms the attacker must already hold a privileged backend administrator account (specifically one with the administrator-update permission), so this is a privilege-escalation / account-takeover issue rather than a remote-unauthenticated breach. No EPSS score, KEV listing, or SSVC decision data was provided, and the input contains no confirmed POC flag - one reference points to a tao0845/CVE-Request technical write-up that likely documents the issue, but functional weaponized exploit code is not confirmed from the data. Weighing the signals: the C:H/I:H/A:H impact is realistic because resetting the built-in super administrator password yields full CMS control, yet practical risk is bounded by (a) the requirement for an existing privileged account and (b) the product's obscurity. Net assessment - a credible insider/second-stage escalation vector worth patching, but not a mass-exploitation priority; treat as medium real-world risk despite the High CVSS. The missing EPSS and absence from KEV mean there is no evidence of active or widespread exploitation at time of analysis.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

A low-privilege backend administrator (for example a content or sub-admin account) that has been granted the administrator-update permission opens the user-management update flow and submits a new password for the built-in super administrator account without supplying the current password. Because the server does not protect that account, the super admin credentials are overwritten and the attacker logs in as super admin, gaining full control of the CMS. A technical write-up is referenced in the CVE request, but no confirmed functional exploit is identified in the provided data.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
No patch listed yet 0.2% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 06, 2026

Incorrect access control in Feehi CMS 2.1.1 allows a low-privilege backend administrator who holds the administrator-update permission to overwrite the password of the built-in super administrator account, achieving full super-admin takeover. The server neither protects the built-in super administrator record from modification nor requires the target account's current password during the update flow, so a single crafted backend request is sufficient. This is an authenticated privilege-escalation issue (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H, rated 7.2 High) that requires a pre-existing privileged backend session; no public exploit code or confirmed active exploitation was identified at time of analysis, and no vendor-released patch was identified in the available intelligence.

RemediationAI

No vendor-released patch was identified in the available intelligence for CVE-2026-95263, so remediation must currently rely on compensating controls while tracking the upstream repository (https://github.com/liufee/cms) and the NVD entry (https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-95263) for an official fix; the CVE.org and EUVD references currently point only to the project repo, the request write-up (https://github.com/tao0845/CVE-Request/blob/main/CVE-2026-95263.md), and NVD, with no fixed version listed. Highest-value mitigation is to remove the administrator-update permission from every role except the absolute minimum set of trusted operators via the backend RBAC configuration, accepting the trade-off that routine admin account maintenance will then require a dedicated, tightly held account. Second, prevent password changes to the built-in super administrator through the web update flow - either by disabling that account's edit/password form or by hardening the update handler to require the target account's current password and to reject writes against the built-in super admin record - recognizing that any temporary code change will be lost on upgrade and must be re-applied. Third, because the update scenario does not require the old password, treat any password change on the super administrator account as a potential compromise indicator: alert on and audit such change events and force resets at the database level, which carries the operational cost of elevated DB access for legitimate resets. As a containment measure, restrict backend administrative access to a management network or IP allowlist and enforce strong unique credentials plus MFA in front of the backend, noting this limits but does not eliminate the privilege-escalation path for an already-authenticated low-privilege admin.

Affected VersionsENISA

n/a n/a

Affects your stack

Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

Feehi CMS is a PHP content management system built on the Yii2 framework, exposing a backend administrative console with role-based permissions. CVE-2026-95263 is classified under CWE-284 (Improper Access Control): the backend user-management update handler fails to enforce two distinct guards - it does not special-case or lock the built-in super administrator account, and it does not validate the current/old password of the account being modified. The result is a broken authorization boundary in which an operator with the 'administrator-update' permission can write to a record that should be outside their authorization scope, effectively escalating from a limited backend admin to the highest-privileged built-in account. The supplied CPE string (cpe:2.3:a:n/a:n/a) is unresolved and provides no vendor/product mapping, so scoping relies on the description and the ENISA EUVD entry (EUVD-2026-92783), both of which pin the affected release to Feehi CMS 2.1.1; the CVSS vector PR:H confirms the attacker must already be an authenticated privileged user, and UI:N confirms no victim interaction is needed.

Know when Feehi Cms gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (mitre) PRIMARY 7.2 HIGH
AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 7.2 HIGH

Needs an authenticated backend admin with administrator-update permission so PR:H; the request is simple (AC:L/AV:N/UI:N) and super-admin takeover yields full C:H/I:H/A:H within one authority (S:U).

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (mitre).

CVSS VectorVendor: mitre

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
High
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Lifecycle Timeline

3
CVSS changed
Oct 06, 2026 - 14:22 NVD
7.2 (HIGH)
CVE Published
Oct 05, 2026 - 00:00 cve.org
UNKNOWN (no severity yet)
CVE Published
Oct 05, 2026 - 00:00 cve.org
HIGH 7.2

DescriptionCVE.org

Feehi CMS 2.1.1 is vulnerable to Incorrect Access Control. A low-privilege backend administrator with administrator-update permission can change the password of the built-in super administrator account. The server does not enforce protection for this account, and the update scenario does not require the old password.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

Feehi CMS 2.1.1 contains an access-control flaw that allows a backend administrator holding update permissions to silently reset the built-in super administrator password and seize complete control of the site. Any organization running this CMS version is exposed the moment a single mid-level administrator account - or an attacker who has obtained one - decides to escalate, and the takeover can be completed with one crafted request that leaves the legitimate owner locked out. Because the vendor has not released a fix, leadership should treat every deployment of Feehi CMS 2.1.1 as functionally unpatched and prioritize containment over remediation timelines.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations: strip the administrator-update permission from all non-essential backend accounts and enforce least privilege on backend roles; place the CMS administrative interface behind VPN or IP allowlisting with MFA; monitor and alert on changes to the built-in super administrator record; rotate super-admin credentials and use unique secrets; apply WAF virtual patching to block crafted requests to administrator password-update functionality; maintain offline backups of CMS data and configuration to support recovery if takeover occurs.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.2%
Top 91% exploitable
Prevalence
Rare
obscure open-source PHP CMS, minimal enterprise or production footprint
Data Quality
6 sources
Confidence: High
EUVD NVD CVE.org EPSS Vulnrichment GitHub VulDB

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.2%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

36
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +36
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy