Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessObtain promoter-level account
-
DeliveryInject JS into City/Description field
-
ExploitPayload stored or reflected via edit-general endpoint
-
ExecutionVictim views event page or crafted URL
-
ImpactScript executes, steals session data
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Output encoding, context-aware escaping
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Execution The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires an authenticated promoter account (PR:L) able to reach the event creation/editing workflow. Stored XSS: inject JavaScript into the City parameter at /events/<event_name>/edit_general while creating or editing a promoter-assigned event; the payload then executes for anyone viewing that event's public page. Reflected XSS: supply a payload in the Description parameter at /events/<event_name>/edit-general when submitting an event with required fields left blank, and deliver the resulting crafted URL to a victim. Both variants require victim interaction (UI:A) - either visiting the public event page or clicking the attacker-supplied link - which, together with the promoter-level authentication requirement, limits realistic exploitation. |
| Impact | This is a genuinely low-to-moderate priority issue, not a high-CVSS inflation case. The vendor-supplied CVSS 4.0 base score is 4.8 (AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N) - a network-reachable but authenticated (PR:L, a promoter account) cross-site scripting flaw whose only confirmed technical impact is limited integrity (VI:L); the vendor assigns no confidentiality impact (VC:N) even though the description states session data can be stolen, so there is mild internal inconsistency between the narrative ('steal their session data', implying some confidentiality loss) and the scored VC:N - worth noting but it does not materially change the modest severity. There is no EPSS score, no CISA KEV listing, and no public proof-of-concept provided in the intelligence, so exploitation status is 'no public exploit identified at time of analysis.' No SSVC decision data was supplied. The combination of required promoter-level authentication, required victim interaction (UI:A), and a niche affected product keeps real-world risk low despite the network attack vector. Treat as a routine patch-when-available item rather than an emergency. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker who holds (or obtains) a promoter account edits an event and injects JavaScript into the City field via /events/<event_name>/edit_general; the payload is stored and then executes in the browser of any visitor to the event's public page (stored XSS), enabling session/cookie theft. Alternatively, the attacker crafts a URL targeting the Description parameter on the edit-general endpoint and sends it to a victim, whose browser reflects and runs the script (reflected XSS). No public proof-of-concept was provided, and both paths require the authenticated promoter workflow plus victim interaction. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 01, 2026
Stored and reflected cross-site scripting in Entradium (by Crocantickets) lets an authenticated promoter-level account inject JavaScript through the event creation/editing workflow: the City parameter at /events/<event_name>/edit_general is stored and executes on the event's public page, while the Description parameter at /events/<event_name>/edit-general is reflected when required fields are left blank and the resulting crafted URL is delivered to a victim. Both variants require victim interaction (viewing the public event page or clicking the attacker-supplied link) and a promoter-level account, which keeps realistic exploitability low to moderate; the vendor CVSS 4.0 base score is 4.8, and the independent assessment scores it CVSS 3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and there is no confirmed actively exploited (CISA KEV) status. Successful exploitation could allow theft of session data from users who view the affected event page or follow the crafted link.
RemediationAI
No vendor-released patch is identified in the available advisory data, and no fixed version is stated by INCIBE, so remediation must rely on compensating controls until a patched Entradium release is published. Restrict the ability to create or edit events to a tightly controlled set of trusted promoter accounts, since both XSS variants require an authenticated promoter-level account (PR:L) - this reduces the set of possible attackers but does not fix the underlying input handling. Apply output encoding and input sanitization for the City and Description parameters on /events/<event_name>/edit_general and /events/<event_name>/edit-general, and validate server-side rather than relying on client-side form checks; this requires code-level changes that only the vendor can ship. As an interim layer, deploy a Content Security Policy that disallows inline and untrusted script execution on public event pages and on the event editing workflow, and set session cookies with HttpOnly and SameSite attributes so that any script that does execute cannot trivially read session data; these controls reduce the impact of successful injection but can break legitimate site functionality if not scoped carefully. Monitor the INCIBE advisory at https://www.incibe.es/en/incibe-cert/notices/aviso/multiple-vulnerabilities-entradium-crocantickets and the vendor's release notes for a fixed Entradium version, and treat any promoter account compromise or unexpected event page modification as a possible exploitation signal.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affects your stack
Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The issue is CWE-79 (Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation, i.e. cross-site scripting) in Entradium, a ticketing/event management platform by Crocantickets. Two attack surfaces are involved: a stored XSS through the City field of the /events/<event_name>/edit_general endpoint, where injected JavaScript is persisted and later executed in the browser of anyone visiting that event's public page; and a reflected XSS through the Description field of the /events/<event_name>/edit-general endpoint, triggered when an event is submitted with required fields missing, allowing a payload to be reflected back and executed when a victim opens the attacker-supplied URL. The CPE cpe:2.3:a:crocantickets:entradium:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* uses a wildcard version, indicating that no specific patched or affected version range is enumerated in the advisory data. The CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A with only VI:L) and the independent CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N) both agree that the attacker needs an authenticated promoter-level account and that the victim must interact, with integrity impact only and no direct confidentiality or availability impact in the base vector; the independent assessment notes scope change in the 3.1 formulation, while CVSS 4.0 handles this via subsequent-system fields.
Know when Entradium gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Authenticated promoter access gives PR:L; victim must view page/click link (UI:R); script runs in a separate victim browser context (S:C) with limited session/content impact (C:L/I:L).
Primary rating from Vendor (INCIBE).
CVSS VectorVendor: INCIBE
DescriptionCVE.org
CVE-2026-7173: Cross-Site Scripting vulnerability in Entradium, by Crocantickets. Exploitation of this vulnerability could allow a remote attacker to send a specially crafted URL to the victim and steal their session data.
- (Stored XSS) The City parameter in the endpoint /events/<event_name>/edit_general during the process of creating or editing events assigned to a promoter allows for the injection of JavaScript that will execute on the event’s public page.
- (Reflected XSS) The Description parameter in the endpoint /events/<event_name>/edit-general when attempting to create or modify an event without filling in all required fields.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Cross-Site Scripting occurs when an application accepts untrusted data and sends it to a web browser without proper validation or encoding.
Stored cross-site scripting in the Entradium event-ticketing platform allows an authenticated event organizer to inject
Stored cross-site scripting in Entradium lets an authenticated promoter inject JavaScript into the Business Name field a
Stored cross-site scripting in Entradium (by Crocantickets) allows an authenticated attacker with privileges to create e
EUVD-2026-90743
GHSA-rq56-r6hv-c2wv
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB