Skip to main content

Paytm Payment Gateway EUVDEUVD-2026-90509

| CVE-2026-81739 HIGH
Cross-site Scripting (XSS) (CWE-79)
2026-10-01 contact@wpscan.com GHSA-hxqp-r3vv-h45f
7.5
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: wpscan
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Identify site with gateway enabled sans credentials
  2. Delivery
    Forge payment callback bypassing integrity check
  3. Exploit
    Store XSS payload via callback field
  4. Execution
    Administrator opens plugin admin page
  5. Persist
    Script executes in admin session
  6. Impact
    Hijack admin privileges / site takeover

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Output encoding, context-aware escaping
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Requires the Paytm Payment Gateway to be configured in a state where it is ENABLED WITHOUT credentials, which is what allows the callback integrity check to be forged by an unauthenticated attacker - this is the core non-default prerequisite. The attacker must send a crafted/forged payment callback whose data is stored by the plugin. Execution is further gated on user interaction (UI:R): a store administrator must subsequently view the admin page that renders the stored callback data unescaped. Limiting factors: the specific credential-less gateway configuration, the need for an admin to visit the affected page, and plugin versions before 2.8.9 only.

Impact

This is CWE-79 stored cross-site scripting in the Paytm Payment Gateway WordPress plugin (before 2.8.9). The provided CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H, score 7.5) describes a network-reachable, unauthenticated (PR:N) flaw, but two signals meaningfully lower real-world risk: AC:H reflects the non-default precondition that the gateway must be enabled WITHOUT credentials (so the callback integrity check can be forged), and UI:R reflects that payload execution waits on a store administrator opening the affected admin page. No EPSS score, no CISA KEV listing, and no public exploit code are present in the supplied data, so exploitation status is 'no public exploit identified at time of analysis.' The C:H/I:H/A:H impact rating is aggressive for XSS and appears to model full administrator-session compromise (the script runs in the admin's authenticated context); treat it as achievable-worst-case rather than guaranteed. Net: a credible but conditional stored-XSS-to-admin-takeover issue, not a mass-exploitation priority given the non-default config requirement and the absence of any exploitation telemetry. A vendor patch is available and should be the primary mitigation.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An unauthenticated attacker crafts a forged Paytm payment callback carrying a JavaScript payload in a stored field, abusing the fact that the callback integrity check is bypassable when the gateway is enabled without credentials. The plugin stores the unsanitized data and later renders it unescaped on a plugin admin page. When a store administrator opens that page, the script executes in their authenticated session, enabling actions up to account/site takeover. No public exploit code is identified in the supplied data.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.2% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 01, 2026

Stored cross-site scripting in the Paytm Payment Gateway WordPress plugin (all versions before 2.8.9) allows unauthenticated attackers to inject script that later executes in a store administrator's browser session. The plugin fails to sanitize or escape payment callback data before rendering it on an admin page, and the callback integrity check can be forged whenever the gateway is enabled in a credential-less configuration, which is the core non-default prerequisite; exploitation is remote and unauthenticated (PR:N) but requires low attack complexity prerequisites plus user interaction, since a store administrator must subsequently open the affected admin page (UI:R). No public exploit code was identified and there is no confirmed active exploitation (CISA KEV) at time of analysis, and a vendor patch is available. Successful exploitation yields script execution in an administrator session, which can lead to full site compromise given the high confidentiality and integrity impact.

RemediationAI

Vendor-released patch: Paytm Payment Gateway 2.8.9. Upgrade the plugin to 2.8.9 or later on every WordPress installation, including staging and multisite networks, and verify the installed version after updating since the fix must be applied to the plugin itself and not to WordPress core; details are in the WPScan advisory at https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/f77f3f04-cb98-4687-9080-dd0c99a7e926/. If patching must be deferred, the highest-value compensating control is to eliminate the prerequisite: do not leave the Paytm Payment Gateway enabled in a credential-less configuration, and instead configure valid gateway/API credentials so the callback integrity check can actually validate signatures, which neutralizes forgery of the callback payload. Where that is not operationally possible, restrict who can reach the plugin's administrative pages (for example via role hardening or an IP- or SSO-restricted admin area) and consider temporarily deactivating the plugin, accepting the trade-off that payment processing stops. A WAF rule or virtual patch blocking HTML/script-bearing content in requests to the plugin's callback endpoint can reduce exposure but is bypassable and does not remediate the missing output encoding, so it should only be a stopgap; note also that stored payloads already persisted in the database will continue to fire until the underlying rows are cleaned, so purge stored callback records after upgrading or scan the database for injected script content. As of analysis, no public exploit code exists but the patched version should be treated as time-sensitive given the unauthenticated attack path and the high impact of administrator-session script execution.

Affected VersionsENISA

Paytm Payment Gateway 0 <2.8.9

Affected Packages

euvd paytm_payment_gateway fix: 2.8.9

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The root cause is CWE-79 (Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation, i.e. cross-site scripting) in a stored/persistent form. Payment gateway callbacks are inherently untrusted, network-reachable input: the Paytm Payment Gateway WordPress plugin receives them, persists the callback payload, and later outputs that stored data inside an administrative page without output encoding or sanitization. Normally such callbacks are validated by an integrity check (typically a signature/HMAC-style verification derived from merchant credentials), but when the gateway is enabled without credentials, that integrity check has no secret to validate against and can be forged, turning the callback endpoint into an unauthenticated write primitive for attacker-controlled HTML/JavaScript. The stored payload then executes in the security context of the admin page when an administrator views it, so the trust boundary that fails is the transition from unauthenticated third-party callback input to privileged administrative rendering. The assessed vector (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H) reflects network attackability, unauthenticated access, the non-default configuration prerequisite and required admin interaction, and a scope change because code runs in the administrator's session rather than the attacker's own. No CPE identifiers were supplied in the source data; the affected component is identified by the EUVD version range rather than a CPE string.

Know when WordPress gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (wpscan) PRIMARY 7.5 HIGH
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 8.3 HIGH

Unauthenticated network reach (PR:N) but AC:H for the credential-less-gateway/forged-integrity precondition and UI:R for admin page view; S:C because the script executes in the admin's browser authority, enabling full admin-session impact.

3.1 AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (wpscan).

CVSS VectorVendor: wpscan

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
High
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Lifecycle Timeline

4
CVSS changed
Oct 01, 2026 - 11:22 NVD
7.5 (HIGH)
Patch available
Oct 01, 2026 - 07:01 EUVD
CVE Published
Oct 01, 2026 - 06:17 cve.org
HIGH 7.5
CVE Published
Oct 01, 2026 - 06:17 cve.org
UNKNOWN (no severity yet)

DescriptionCVE.org

The Paytm Payment Gateway WordPress plugin before 2.8.9 does not sanitize and escape data it stores from payment callbacks before outputting it in an admin page, and the integrity check on those callbacks can be forged when the gateway is enabled without credentials, allowing unauthenticated users to store scripts that will run in the session of a store administrator.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

The Paytm Payment Gateway WordPress plugin, used by e-commerce sites to process payments, contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability that can lead to full site compromise if exploited. Store administrators and their customers are affected, as an attacker could inject malicious scripts that execute in an administrator's browser, potentially stealing credentials or altering site data. While no public exploit has been identified and exploitation requires a non-default configuration plus administrator interaction, the high severity warrants immediate patching to version 2.8.9 or later.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.2%
Top 89% exploitable
Prevalence
Low
niche region-focused Paytm payment plugin for WordPress, limited install base
Data Quality
4 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.2%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

38
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +38
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Cross-Site Scripting occurs when an application accepts untrusted data and sends it to a web browser without proper validation or encoding.

CVE-2016-10033 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Dec 30

The mailSend function in the isMail transport in PHPMailer before 5.2.18 might allow remote attackers to pass extra para

CVE-2016-10045 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Dec 30

The isMail transport in PHPMailer before 5.2.20 might allow remote attackers to pass extra parameters to the mail comman

CVE-2023-6553 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Dec 15

The Backup Migration plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Remote Code Execution in all versions up to, and including, 1

CVE-2024-5084 CRITICAL POC
9.8 May 23

The Hash Form - Drag & Drop Form Builder plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary file uploads due to missing fil

CVE-2024-44000 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Oct 20

Authentication bypass in the LiteSpeed Cache WordPress plugin (versions prior to 6.5.0.1) allows unauthenticated remote

CVE-2024-8353 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Sep 28

The GiveWP - Donation Plugin and Fundraising Platform plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to PHP Object Injection in all

CVE-2020-36847 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jul 12

The Simple File List plugin for WordPress through version 4.2.2 contains an unauthenticated remote code execution vulner

CVE-2025-11749 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Nov 05

The AI Engine WordPress plugin through version 3.1.3 exposes Bearer Token values through the /mcp/v1/ REST API endpoint

CVE-2025-27007 CRITICAL POC
9.8 May 01

The SureTriggers WordPress plugin through version 1.0.82 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows unaut

CVE-2016-1209 CRITICAL POC
9.8 May 14

The Ninja Forms plugin before 2.9.42.1 for WordPress allows remote attackers to conduct PHP object injection attacks via

CVE-2024-4443 CRITICAL POC
9.8 May 22

The Business Directory Plugin - Easy Listing Directories for WordPress plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to time-based

CVE-2026-63030 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jul 17

Remote code execution in WordPress 6.9.x (before 6.9.5) and 7.0.x (before 7.0.2) arises from a REST API batch endpoint r

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy