Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessIdentify site running User Frontend <4.3.12
-
DeliveryConfirm WP registration disabled but form live
-
ExploitSend crafted account-creation request
-
ExecutionBypass registration check, create account with default role
-
ImpactAutomate to mass-create accounts / pivot to authenticated endpoints
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V8 - Authorization Access control enforcement
MITRE ATT&CK
1 technique across 1 tactic: Defense Evasion The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitable only when the site has WordPress user registration DISABLED (the setting the plugin fails to honor) yet still exposes the User Frontend registration form/endpoint, on plugin versions 2.5.8 through before 4.3.12. No authentication and no user interaction are required (PR:N/UI:N), and the request is remote over the network. The principal limiting factor on impact is that created accounts receive only the site's DEFAULT role (normally Subscriber), so severity escalates only where an administrator has configured an elevated default role; sites that intentionally allow registration are unaffected by design. |
| Impact | This is a genuine but low-to-moderate priority issue best treated as a routine hygiene patch rather than an emergency. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N, score 5.3) correctly captures a network-reachable, unauthenticated, low-complexity flaw whose only impact is a limited integrity effect (I:L) - an attacker can create accounts that the operator intended to block, but gains no confidentiality access and no availability impact. Signals are internally consistent: SSVC scores Exploitation as 'none' (no observed exploitation), Automatable as 'yes' (the account-creation endpoint can be scripted at scale), and Technical Impact as 'partial', which aligns with I:L only. No EPSS score, no CISA KEV listing, and no public POC are present in the input, so there is no evidence of active exploitation - exploitation status is 'no public exploit identified at time of analysis'. The practical risk is that the account gains only the site's DEFAULT role (typically Subscriber), so unless the site is misconfigured to grant elevated default roles, the direct impact is bounded; the real-world danger is spam/enumeration and using the foothold as a pivot for other authenticated vulnerabilities. No key data is missing or contradictory here - CVSS, CWE-284, and SSVC all agree this is a low-severity access-control gap. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An operator disables WordPress user registration site-wide but keeps the User Frontend plugin's registration form active. An unauthenticated attacker scripts POST requests to the plugin's account-creation endpoint and mass-creates accounts (each granted the default role) despite registration being turned off, then uses those footholds for spam, content posting, or as a launchpad against other authenticated-only plugin endpoints. No public exploit code is identified at time of analysis, but SSVC flags the flaw as automatable, so scripted abuse is straightforward. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Sep 30, 2026
Unauthenticated account creation in the User Frontend WordPress plugin (versions 2.5.8 through before 4.3.12) lets remote attackers register a new user on sites where WordPress user registration is disabled, because the plugin never verifies that setting before processing its own registration form. The created account receives the site's default role, normally Subscriber, so impact is largely limited to unwanted accounts, spam, and content noise unless an administrator has configured an elevated default role; CVSS 3.1 scores it 5.3 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N). There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and CISA's SSVC assessment records exploitation as none, so this is a genuine but low-to-moderate priority issue best handled as routine hygiene patching rather than an emergency. Vendor-released patch: 4.3.12.
RemediationAI
Upgrade the User Frontend plugin to 4.3.12 or later, the fixed release indicated by the affected-version range and the vendor advisory (https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/61b04ece-5050-465e-aa11-de2ff79c6e8c/); the vendor reports a patch as available, so this is a straightforward update with no custom code changes required. If immediate patching is not possible, the most effective compensating control is to remove or unwire the plugin's registration form and any page, shortcode, or widget that embeds it, which stops the unauthenticated creation path at the cost of disabling front-end registration entirely for legitimate users. Alternatively, place an edge/Web Application Firewall rule or reverse-proxy restriction in front of the plugin's registration handler to block unauthenticated POST requests to that endpoint - effective but brittle, since the endpoint path can change between plugin versions and any bypass re-opens the hole. As a hygiene measure independent of the patch, confirm that the WordPress default role is set to Subscriber so that any account created this way stays low-privilege, and audit existing user accounts for unexpected registrations on sites where registration was supposed to be off. Note that sites which deliberately allow self-registration gain nothing from this issue and need only keep the plugin current.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The flaw is an improper access control weakness (CWE-284) in the User Frontend plugin, a WordPress front-end user management/registration component. WordPress exposes a global setting (users_can_register) that administrators use to switch self-registration off, and core blocks the registration endpoint when that option is false. The plugin processes its own registration submission without consulting that option, so its form and handler remain functional on sites where registration is intentionally disabled. Because the check is missing rather than mis-ordered, the bypass is deterministic: any remote, unauthenticated request (PR:N/UI:N over AV:N) that reaches the plugin's registration path creates a user. The generated account simply inherits the site's configured default role, which is why the integrity impact is rated Low (I:L) and confidentiality/availability impacts are None (C:N/A:N) - the vulnerability grants no privilege escalation by itself, and severity rises only if an operator has set a privileged default role. The plugin's affected range per EUVD is 2.5.8 up to, but not including, 4.3.12, and WPSCAN is credited as the reporter.
Know when PHP gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Remote, unauthenticated, low-complexity account creation bypassing a disabled-registration check; integrity-only low impact (unwanted default-role accounts), no confidentiality or availability effect.
Primary rating from Vendor (wpscan).
CVSS VectorVendor: wpscan
Lifecycle Timeline
3DescriptionCVE.org
The User Frontend WordPress plugin before 4.3.12 does not check whether the site allows user registration before creating an account, allowing unauthenticated users to create accounts on sites where registration is disabled.
The created account receives the site's default role.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.
In PHP versions 7.1.x below 7.1.33, 7.2.x below 7.2.24 and 7.3.x below 7.3.11 in certain configurations of FPM setup it
sapi/cgi/cgi_main.c in PHP before 5.3.12 and 5.4.x before 5.4.2, when configured as a CGI script (aka php-cgi), does not
(1) boardData102.php, (2) boardData103.php, (3) boardDataJP.php, (4) boardDataNA.php, and (5) boardDataWW.php in Netgear
The '/common/download_agent_installer.php' script in the Quest KACE System Management Appliance 8.0.318 is accessible by
ProjectSend versions prior to r1720 are affected by an improper authentication vulnerability. Rated critical severity (C
Roundcube Webmail contains a critical PHP object deserialization vulnerability (CVE-2025-49113, CVSS 9.9) that allows au
Util/PHP/eval-stdin.php in PHPUnit before 4.8.28 and 5.x before 5.6.3 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary PHP c
Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS management web interface contains an authentication bypass allowing unauthenticated attackers
Nagios XI version xi-5.7.5 is affected by OS command injection. Rated high severity (CVSS 8.8), this vulnerability is re
Nagios XI version xi-5.7.5 is affected by OS command injection. Rated high severity (CVSS 8.8), this vulnerability is re
The get_referers function in /opt/ws/bin/sblistpack in Sophos Web Appliance before 3.7.9.1 and 3.8 before 3.8.1.1 allows
The Backup Migration plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Remote Code Execution in all versions up to, and including, 1
EUVD-2026-89638
GHSA-wm3r-9xmv-rff3
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB