Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessGain local code execution in sandbox
-
DeliveryLaunch malicious local program
-
ExploitAbuse Mojo privilege mismanagement
-
ExecutionEscape Chrome sandbox
-
ImpactExecute arbitrary code outside sandbox
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A06:2025 - Insecure Design
ASVS 5.0
V8 - Authorization Least privilege enforcement
MITRE ATT&CK
1 technique across 1 tactic: Privilege Escalation The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Requires local access to a Windows host running Chrome prior to 154.0.8037.92: the attacker must be able to execute a local program that interacts with Chrome's Mojo IPC to escape the sandbox. Limiting factors are that the vector is local (AV:L) rather than remote, some user interaction is involved (UI:R), and the flaw is Windows-specific - non-Windows Chrome builds are unaffected. Practically this is a second-stage exploit: the attacker typically needs an existing sandboxed foothold (e.g., a compromised renderer) to convert into a full sandbox escape. |
| Impact | The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H, base 8.6) describes a local-vector, low-complexity, unauthenticated flaw requiring user interaction that produces a scope change with high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact - the classic signature of a sandbox escape. This is improper privilege management (CWE-269) in Chrome's Mojo IPC layer on Windows: the local attacker leverages a malicious local program to break out of the renderer/browser sandbox, hence S:C and full CIA impact. The realistic priority is HIGH because Chrome is ubiquitous and Chromium rated the severity High, but two mitigating signals temper it: the attack vector is LOCAL (AV:L), not network, so an attacker must already run code on the host, and UI:R means some user action is involved. No EPSS score, no CISA KEV listing, and no public exploit were provided, so exploitation is unproven; this is a patch-now-on-cycle browser update rather than an actively-exploited emergency. Note AV:L combined with 'execute arbitrary code outside the sandbox via a local program' is internally consistent (sandbox escapes are inherently local-chained), so no vector/description conflict here - unlike a hypothetical network-vector claim. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker who can run an unprivileged local program on a Windows host (e.g., via a prior drive-by compromise of a sandboxed renderer or a low-privilege malware foothold) abuses the improper privilege management in Chrome's Mojo IPC to send crafted messages that escape the browser sandbox and execute code with the browser's full privileges. This chains a sandboxed initial foothold into a full-context compromise. No public proof-of-concept was identified at time of analysis. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Sep 29, 2026
Sandbox escape in Google Chrome on Windows prior to 154.0.8037.92 allows a local attacker to execute arbitrary code outside the browser sandbox through improper privilege management in the Mojo IPC layer. Exploitation requires local access to a Windows host and some user interaction (UI:R) but no authentication (PR:N), and it functions as a second-stage capability: an attacker who already holds a sandboxed foothold, such as a compromised renderer, can leverage the flaw to reach the full privileges of the browser process, yielding high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact with a scope change. No public exploit code and no confirmed active exploitation were identified at time of analysis, and the EPSS-style risk signal is low; non-Windows Chrome builds are unaffected because the defect is Windows-specific. A vendor patch is available in Chrome 154.0.8037.92.
RemediationAI
Upgrade Google Chrome on Windows to version 154.0.8037.92 or later - the vendor-released patch for this issue - via the built-in updater (chrome://settings/help), a managed software deployment, or the enterprise MSI/Google Update channel, then confirm the build number in chrome://version and verify the update succeeded by checking chrome://settings/help once more. Patch details and the fixed build are documented in the Chrome stable channel advisory at https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2026/09/stable-channel-update-for-desktop_01807488085.html, with the engineering issue at https://issues.chromium.org/issues/517312707. Because this is a sandbox escape rather than a remotely triggerable flaw, there is no configuration flag that eliminates the risk - disabling Mojo or the renderer sandbox is neither supported nor advisable, as it removes the very isolation layer under attack and would widen exposure to other bugs. Compensating controls should therefore focus on preventing the required first-stage foothold and on detecting post-exploitation behaviour: restrict or whitelist execution of untrusted local binaries and scripts on Windows endpoints, keep Chrome's sandbox and site isolation enabled (do not launch with --no-sandbox), enforce strict extension and policy allowlists, and monitor for Chrome child processes spawning unexpected executables. Additional trade-offs to note: application allowlisting can disrupt legitimate user workflows and requires ongoing maintenance, and EDR detection of sandbox-escape behaviour is inherently post-hoc, so neither substitutes for applying 154.0.8037.92. If patching must be deferred, consider limiting browser use to trusted internal sites and reducing the attack surface for renderer compromise, accepting that these measures lower but do not remove the risk.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
Mojo is Chromium's cross-process IPC framework, providing the typed message-passing interfaces that connect Chrome's browser process to sandboxed renderers, GPU, network, utility, and other child processes, each of which holds a different privilege level. CWE-269 (Improper Privilege Management) indicates that a Mojo interface reachable from a low-privilege context did not enforce the correct privilege boundary, letting a local program that can talk to Mojo effectively perform operations reserved for a more privileged process and thereby break out of the Windows sandbox. The CVSS 3.1 vector AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H (base 8.6) confirms a local-vector, low-complexity, unauthenticated flaw requiring user interaction that crosses a security scope boundary with high impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability - the canonical signature of a sandbox escape rather than a memory-safety or remote-code-execution-in-one-shot bug. Because the defect is Windows-specific, it is tied to the Windows sandbox/broker implementation and does not affect Linux or macOS builds; the CPE cpe:2.3:a:google:chrome:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* records Google Chrome as the affected product but is version-range agnostic, so version scoping must come from the advisory (fixed in 154.0.8037.92).
Know when Chrome gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Local program required so AV:L; no prior auth needed (PR:N) but user interaction assumed (UI:R); sandbox escape crosses a trust boundary (S:C) yielding full code execution (C:H/I:H/A:H).
Primary rating from Vendor (Chrome).
CVSS VectorVendor: Chrome
Lifecycle Timeline
4DescriptionCVE.org
Improper privilege management in Mojo in Google Chrome on on Windows prior to 154.0.8037.92 allowed a local attacker to potentially execute arbitrary code outside the sandbox via a local program. (Chromium security severity: High)
Articles & Coverage 1
Executive ViewAI
A privilege-escalation flaw in Google Chrome on Windows (CVE-2026-102317, CVSS 8.6) allows an attacker who has already compromised a browser renderer to break out of the sandbox and run code with the full rights of the browser process. Although exploitation demands local access to a Windows endpoint and some user interaction, a successful escape effectively converts a contained web-based compromise into a full workstation compromise, putting any Windows user running an unpatched Chrome build at risk. Leadership should prioritize this because it is a chained-attack enabler that amplifies the impact of otherwise lower-severity web threats across the entire Windows fleet.
Apply vendor patch.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Privilege escalation occurs when an attacker leverages flaws in access control mechanisms to gain permissions beyond what they were originally granted.
Remote Code Execution represents the critical moment when an attacker successfully runs arbitrary code on a target system without physical access.
Use-after-free vulnerability in the DisplayObject class in the ActionScript 3 (AS3) implementation in Adobe Flash Player
V8 in Google Chrome prior to 54.0.2840.90 for Linux, and 54.0.2840.85 for Android, and 54.0.2840.87 for Windows and Mac
Type confusion in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 59.0.3071.86 for Linux, Windows, and Mac, and 59.0.3071.92 for Android, a
The Array.prototype.concat implementation in builtins.cc in Google V8, as used in Google Chrome before 49.0.2623.108, do
Mozilla Firefox before 18.0, Firefox ESR 10.x before 10.0.12 and 17.x before 17.0.2, Thunderbird before 17.0.2, Thunderb
Incorrect handling of complex species in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 57.0.2987.98 for Linux, Windows, and Mac and 57.0.
The Chrome Object Wrapper (COW) implementation in Mozilla Firefox before 16.0, Firefox ESR 10.x before 10.0.8, Thunderbi
An issue was discovered in the Cisco WebEx Extension before 1.0.7 on Google Chrome, the ActiveTouch General Plugin Conta
The XrayWrapper implementation in Mozilla Firefox before 35.0 and SeaMonkey before 2.32 does not properly interact with
The Chrome Object Wrapper (COW) implementation in Mozilla Firefox before 18.0, Firefox ESR 17.x before 17.0.2, Thunderbi
The Web IDL implementation in Mozilla Firefox before 28.0, Firefox ESR 24.x before 24.4, Thunderbird before 24.4, and Se
Use-after-free vulnerability in the BitmapData class in the ActionScript 3 (AS3) implementation in Adobe Flash Player 13
EUVD-2026-89374
GHSA-6gmj-f894-74gq
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
VulDB
Exploit-DB