Skip to main content

Ansible Automation Platform EUVDEUVD-2026-85534

| CVE-2026-71460 MEDIUM
Missing Authorization (CWE-862)
2026-09-23 redhat GHSA-8jrq-6pp4-m2h6
4.3
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: redhat
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain any authenticated AAP account
  2. Delivery
    GET /api/v2/config/ endpoint
  3. Exploit
    Read unguarded license_info block
  4. Execution
    Harvest subscription/pool/SKU/instance data
  5. Impact
    Use for estate recon and support social-engineering

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V8 - Authorization Authorization checks on every request
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Privilege Escalation

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Requires a valid authenticated account of any privilege level on the automation-controller (the /api/v2/config/ endpoint enforces only DRF IsAuthenticated). No superuser or auditor role is needed because the license_info portion of the response is not covered by the superuser/auditor gate that protects project_base_dir, project_local_paths, and custom_virtualenvs. No user interaction, special configuration, or non-default deployment mode is required - it affects default configurations. The primary limiting factor is that unauthenticated network attackers cannot reach the data; a login (even a minimal one) is mandatory, and impact is confined to reading commercial license metadata.

Impact

This is a genuinely low-priority issue despite carrying a network attack vector. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N, base 4.3) is internally consistent with the description: it is a confidentiality-only information-disclosure flaw requiring an authenticated account (PR:L), with no integrity or availability impact and no scope change. No EPSS score, CISA KEV listing, POC, or SSVC decision data was provided, and no public exploit was identified. The impact is limited to leaking commercial license metadata (account/subscription/pool identifiers, SKU, support level, instance counts) to already-authenticated users - it does not grant new access, credentials, or code execution. The realistic risk is reconnaissance and social-engineering enablement rather than direct compromise; the 'Authentication Bypass' tag overstates it, since exploitation actually REQUIRES a valid authenticated session (CWE-862 broken authorization, not authentication bypass). No signals conflict, and no data indicates elevated real-world urgency.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker with any low-privilege authenticated account on the Ansible Automation Platform controller sends a GET request to /api/v2/config/ and reads the license_info block, which is not covered by the superuser/auditor gate. No public exploit is required - a single authenticated API call returns account_number, subscription_id, pool_id, SKU, support level, and instance counts, which the attacker uses to size the estate and craft convincing social-engineering pretexts against Red Hat support.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
Patch available 0.2% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Sep 23, 2026

Authenticated users of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2 can read sensitive commercial license metadata - account number, subscription ID, pool ID, SKU, support level, and instance counts - from the /api/v2/config/ endpoint, which is guarded only by Django REST Framework's IsAuthenticated permission class. The superuser/auditor gate that protects other configuration keys such as project_base_dir, project_local_paths, and custom_virtualenvs does not extend to the license_info block, so any logged-in account of any privilege level can retrieve it without user interaction or non-default configuration. Per the independent assessment this is a genuinely low-priority, information-disclosure issue (CVSS 4.3, PR:L) - no public exploit has been identified at time of analysis, and the practical risk is reconnaissance and social-engineering enablement against Red Hat support rather than direct compromise.

RemediationAI

No vendor-released patch version is identified in the available intelligence, so the first action is to consult the Red Hat advisory at https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-71460 and the Bugzilla record at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2512369 for the current errata and upgrade target, then apply the fixed automation-controller package for your AAP 2 release as soon as it is published. In the interim, apply compensating controls that directly address the missing authorization: (1) restrict access to /api/v2/config/ at a reverse proxy, API gateway, or WAF so that only administrators/superusers reach it - the trade-off is that any legitimate UI, CLI, or integration feature that reads configuration keys from that endpoint for ordinary users will break, so scope the rule by path plus role where possible rather than blocking the endpoint outright; (2) where a proxy-layer filter is available, strip or mask the license_info object from responses to non-privileged callers, which mitigates the metadata leak while leaving the rest of the configuration readable, at the cost of maintaining a custom response-rewrite rule; (3) tighten identity hygiene by removing or disabling unused accounts and reviewing which principals genuinely need API access, since the only precondition is any authenticated login - this reduces the attacker pool but eliminates no risk from existing legitimate users; and (4) monitor controller and proxy logs for repeated or anomalous GET requests to /api/v2/config/ as a reconnaissance indicator, generating detection signal that can help identify interest in the entitlement data even where access cannot be fully closed.

Affected VersionsENISA

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.6 for RHEL 9 patch: 0:4.7.17-1.el9ap

Affects your stack

Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The vulnerable component is the automation-controller API of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2 (per the CPE cpe:2.3:a:red_hat:red_hat_ansible_automation_platform_2, wildcarded for all versions). The endpoint /api/v2/config/ is a Django REST Framework view whose permission enforcement consists solely of IsAuthenticated, meaning any principal holding a valid API session or token passes the check. Root cause is CWE-862 (Missing Authorization): the code applies a stricter superuser/auditor permission gate to some response keys (project_base_dir, project_local_paths, custom_virtualenvs) but fails to apply the same gate to the license_info object, which is serialized and returned to the caller regardless of role. The leaked fields are commercial/entitlement metadata rather than secrets or credentials: account number, subscription_id, pool_id, SKU, support_level, and instance counts. Because the CVSS vector is CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N, the exposed data is limited to confidentiality impact and does not by itself permit privilege escalation, code execution, or data modification; its value to an attacker is contextual - identifying entitlement size and support contract details that can be used for pretexting Red Hat support or estate-sizing reconnaissance.

Know when Django gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (redhat) PRIMARY 4.3 MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
vuln.today AI 4.3 MEDIUM

Any authenticated user (PR:L) can read the endpoint over the network with a single request; only low-sensitivity license metadata is exposed (C:L), with no integrity or availability impact.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Red Hat 4.3 MEDIUM

Primary rating from Vendor (redhat).

CVSS VectorVendor: redhat

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
None
Availability
None

DescriptionCVE.org

/api/v2/config/ is protected only by IsAuthenticated. license_info (account_number, subscription_id, pool_id, sku, support_level, instance counts) returned to any authenticated user. The superuser/auditor gate only covers project_base_dir/project_local_paths/custom_virtualenvs, not license_info. Enables social engineering against Red Hat support and estate sizing reconnaissance.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.2%
Top 89% exploitable
Prevalence
Medium
enterprise Ansible automation platform, common but not ubiquitous vendor deployment
Data Quality
4 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.2%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact· derived
Medium
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

22
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +22
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

More in Django

View all
CVE-2021-23336 MEDIUM POC
5.9 Feb 15

The package python/cpython from 0 and before 3.6.13, from 3.7.0 and before 3.7.10, from 3.8.0 and before 3.8.8, from 3.9

CVE-2017-12794 MEDIUM POC
6.1 Sep 07

In Django 1.10.x before 1.10.8 and 1.11.x before 1.11.5, HTML autoescaping was disabled in a portion of the template for

CVE-2022-34265 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jul 04

An issue was discovered in Django 3.2 before 3.2.14 and 4.0 before 4.0.6. Rated critical severity (CVSS 9.8), this vulne

CVE-2021-35042 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jul 02

Django 3.1.x before 3.1.13 and 3.2.x before 3.2.5 allows QuerySet.order_by SQL injection if order_by is untrusted input

CVE-2019-19844 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Dec 18

Django before 1.11.27, 2.x before 2.2.9, and 3.x before 3.0.1 allows account takeover. Rated critical severity (CVSS 9.8

CVE-2026-61594 CRITICAL POC
9.1 Sep 16

An authentication/authorization bypass in the djust Python live-view framework (versions prior to 1.0.7) lets unauthenti

CVE-2026-61599 HIGH POC
8.8 Sep 16

Unauthenticated arbitrary Python module import in djust before 1.0.7 lets any client that can reach the WebSocket or SSE

CVE-2020-9402 HIGH POC
8.8 Mar 05

Django 1.11 before 1.11.29, 2.2 before 2.2.11, and 3.0 before 3.0.4 allows SQL Injection if untrusted data is used as a

CVE-2016-6186 MEDIUM POC
6.1 Aug 05

Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the dismissChangeRelatedObjectPopup function in contrib/admin/static/admin/j

CVE-2026-93456 HIGH POC
8.4 Sep 18

Forged content modification in django-page-cms through 2.0.13 lets unauthenticated remote attackers exploit five CSRF-ex

CVE-2026-61593 HIGH POC
8.1 Sep 16

Cross-site request forgery in djust's Server-Sent-Events transport affects all versions prior to 1.0.7 and allows a cros

CVE-2026-61590 HIGH POC
7.4 Sep 16

Unauthenticated remote attackers can read live Django view and session state and invoke server-side handlers through dju

Vendor StatusVendor

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy