Skip to main content

The Post Grid EUVDEUVD-2026-85483

| CVE-2026-94671 MEDIUM
Cross-site Scripting (XSS) (CWE-79)
2026-09-23 Patchstack GHSA-pmx4-h98q-7j97
6.5
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: Patchstack
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain Contributor account on site
  2. Delivery
    Inject XSS payload into Post Grid field
  3. Exploit
    Store malicious content pending review
  4. Execution
    Admin views content in wp-admin
  5. Persist
    Script executes in admin's browser session
  6. Impact
    Hijack privileged actions/steal session

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Output encoding, context-aware escaping
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires an authenticated WordPress account with at least Contributor privileges (PR:L) on a site running The Post Grid plugin version 7.9.5 or earlier, plus subsequent interaction by a higher-privileged user (UI:R) - typically an administrator or editor viewing the attacker-submitted content in wp-admin, which is when the stored payload executes. Limiting factors: the attacker cannot exploit anonymously (rules out drive-by mass exploitation), the payload only achieves impact when a privileged user renders it, and the impact is scoped to script execution in the victim's browser (Low C/I) rather than direct server compromise. Sites that disable open user registration or restrict Contributor content review significantly reduce exposure.

Impact

This is a moderate-severity, low-real-world-priority issue. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L, base 6.5) describes an authenticated (PR:L) stored XSS requiring victim interaction (UI:R) with only Low confidentiality and integrity impact. Two exploitation signals materially cap risk: PR:L means the attacker must already hold at least a Contributor account on the target WordPress site (a semi-trusted, self-registerable-in-some-configs role), and UI:R means a higher-privileged user (typically an admin/editor) must view the malicious content for the payload to fire. There is NO EPSS score, NO CISA KEV listing, and NO public POC referenced in the provided intelligence - the sole source is the Patchstack database entry. The A:L (availability) rating is questionable for a reflected-in-admin XSS; a stored XSS that runs script in an admin browser typically maps cleanly to C:L/I:L with A:N, so a more defensible score is ~6.4. Bottom line: real but not urgent - this is a classic Contributor-role stored XSS that matters for multi-author WordPress sites, not a mass-exploitation candidate.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker holding a Contributor account (or one obtained via open registration/compromise) on a site running The Post Grid <= 7.9.5 submits a post or grid element containing a crafted XSS payload in an inadequately sanitized field. When an administrator or editor later reviews that content in wp-admin, the script executes in their authenticated session, enabling actions such as cookie/nonce theft or admin-context requests. No public exploit code is referenced in the provided data.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
No patch listed yet 0.2% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Sep 23, 2026

Stored cross-site scripting in The Post Grid WordPress plugin (RadiusTheme) affects versions up to and including 7.9.5, allowing an authenticated user with Contributor-level access to inject script content that executes in the browser of a higher-privileged user - typically an administrator or editor reviewing the submission in wp-admin. The issue is rated 6.5 (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N per our assessment), and exploitation requires both an authenticated Contributor account and subsequent victim interaction, so this is a moderate-severity, low-real-world-priority issue rather than a mass-exploitation threat. No confirmed active exploitation (not in CISA KEV) and no public exploit code identified at time of analysis; the vulnerability was reported through Patchstack and is tracked as EUVD-2026-85483.

RemediationAI

No vendor-released patch is identified in the available data - the supplied advisory marks 7.9.5 as the affected ceiling but does not name a fixed version, so verify the current release on the WordPress.org plugin page or with RadiusTheme and upgrade to the first version confirmed to address the issue (see the Patchstack record for updates: https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/the-post-grid/vulnerability/wordpress-the-post-grid-plugin-7-9-5-cross-site-scripting-xss-vulnerability). Because the entry point is a Contributor-level account, the highest-value compensating control is to eliminate untrusted Contributors: disable open user registration if it is not required, audit existing Contributor accounts, and require editorial review of all submitted post content before it is rendered - the trade-off is added editorial workload and reduced community contribution throughput. If the plugin's grid functionality is not in active use, deactivating and removing it eliminates the attack surface entirely; if it is required, apply a WAF or ModSecurity rule set that filters script-bearing payloads in post bodies and administrative pages, accepting that signature-based filtering can be bypassed by encoding tricks and may generate false positives. Note that mitigation is only partial: any Contributor who can place content into the grid remains able to trigger script execution for a privileged viewer who later opens the affected admin page, so patch-level remediation should be prioritized once a fixed version is confirmed.

Affected VersionsENISA

The Post Grid n/a ≤7.9.5

Affected Packages

euvd the_post_grid no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The flaw is a CWE-79 improper-neutralization-during-web-page-generation defect in the WordPress plugin The Post Grid, identified by CPE cpe:2.3:a:radiustheme:the_post_grid:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* and tracked in the ENISA EUVD as EUVD-2026-85483. In WordPress's capability model, a Contributor can create and edit their own posts but cannot publish them; the plugin renders user-supplied post content into its grid output without adequate escaping or contextual output encoding, so markup supplied by that Contributor is stored and later re-emitted into an administrative page where a privileged user's browser executes it. The changed scope in the CVSS vector (S:C) reflects that the injected script runs in the security context of the higher-privileged victim rather than the attacker, which is why script execution - not server compromise - is the impact. Our independent assessment scores confidentiality and integrity impact as Low with no availability impact (A:N), while the advisory-sourced vector lists A:L; the assessed A:N value is the authoritative one used here. The single provided reference is the Patchstack vulnerability record, which is also the source of the affected-version ceiling of 7.9.5.

Know when The Post Grid gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (Patchstack) PRIMARY 6.5 MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
vuln.today AI 5.4 MEDIUM

Contributor account needed (PR:L), admin must view content (UI:R), script crosses into admin context (S:C) with Low C/I; no genuine availability impact so A:N, giving ~6.4.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (Patchstack).

CVSS VectorVendor: Patchstack

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

DescriptionCVE.org

Contributor Cross Site Scripting (XSS) in The Post Grid <= 7.9.5 versions.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.2%
Top 94% exploitable
Prevalence
Medium
popular RadiusTheme WordPress post-grid/layout plugin, common but not universal
Data Quality
4 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.2%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact· derived
Medium
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

32
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +32
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Cross-Site Scripting occurs when an application accepts untrusted data and sends it to a web browser without proper validation or encoding.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy