Skip to main content

IBM Guardium EUVDEUVD-2026-83424

| CVE-2026-84074 HIGH
Cross-site Scripting (XSS) (CWE-79)
2026-09-18 ibm GHSA-p9p9-q9h9-qrvq
8.9
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: ibm
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Authenticate as low-priv Guardium user
  2. Delivery
    Inject XSS payload into web-generated field
  3. Exploit
    Administrator views crafted page
  4. Execution
    Script executes in victim's browser session
  5. Impact
    Hijack session / act as privileged user

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Output encoding, context-aware escaping
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Requires the attacker to hold valid low-privilege authenticated access to the Guardium Data Protection 12.2 web interface (PR:L) and to lure a second, typically higher-privileged, user into rendering the attacker-controlled content (UI:R) - the payload only executes when the victim views the improperly-neutralized web page. Limiting factors: no unauthenticated path, mandatory victim interaction, and the impact is confined to the victim's browser session (Scope-changed to the web app's security context) rather than native code execution on the appliance. Affects IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2; patched builds via IBM node 7288035 remove the exposure.

Impact

The vendor CVSS of 8.9 (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L) overstates real-world risk for what is, per CWE-79 (improper neutralization during web page generation), a cross-site scripting flaw - not the server-side arbitrary code execution implied by the 'execute arbitrary code' wording and the 'RCE' tag. XSS executes attacker script in a victim's browser session, not native code on the appliance, so C:H/I:H are inflated; a defensible client-side impact is closer to C:L/I:L/A:N (~5.4). Exploitation is gated by UI:R (an authenticated victim must be lured into rendering the malicious page) and PR:L (the attacker must already hold valid low-privilege credentials), both of which sharply reduce practical exploitability. There is no EPSS score, no CISA KEV listing, and no public exploit - the signal is 'no public exploit identified at time of analysis.' This is a real-but-secondary priority: a genuine stored/reflected XSS worth patching in a security appliance's admin UI, but not a wormable network RCE. Note the conflict: the description's 'execute arbitrary code' phrasing and the RCE tag contradict the CWE-79 classification - the CWE is authoritative here and indicates client-side script execution.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

A low-privileged authenticated Guardium user injects a malicious script payload into a field that is later reflected or stored in a web page. When a higher-privileged operator or administrator views that page, the script executes in their authenticated browser session, letting the attacker steal session tokens or perform actions in the admin's context (Scope-changed). No public proof-of-concept exists, and successful attack requires the victim to interact with the crafted content (UI:R).

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.3% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Sep 18, 2026

Cross-site scripting in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 allows an attacker holding valid low-privilege web interface credentials to inject content that executes scripts in a second, typically higher-privileged user's browser session when that user views the improperly neutralized page. Although the vendor description and the 'RCE' tag suggest arbitrary code execution, CWE-79 (improper neutralization of input during web page generation) and the assessed vector restrict impact to the victim's browser session in the web application's security context, not native code execution on the appliance, and exploitation requires both authenticated access and victim interaction. No public exploit code and no confirmed active exploitation were identified at time of analysis, and IBM has published a patch advisory at https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7288035.

RemediationAI

IBM has published a patch for this issue, referenced as the vendor advisory at https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7288035; patch availability is confirmed per the vendor advisory, and administrators should apply the updated Guardium Data Protection build for the 12.2 line as identified in that node, since the exact fixed build number is defined on IBM's support page rather than in the CVE record. Until the update is applied, the most effective compensating control is to reduce the population and the privilege level of accounts that can reach the Guardium administration web interface, because the attack requires an authenticated low-privilege account plus a second user viewing attacker-controlled content; disabling or tightly restricting self-service and low-privilege content-editing features reduces the injection surface, at the cost of restricting legitimate delegated administration workflows. Administrators should also avoid browsing the Guardium web console while authenticated as a highly privileged user in the same browser session used for general web browsing, and should terminate idle sessions promptly, which limits the window in which a stored payload can execute but does not eliminate the weakness. Note that deploying a web application firewall or adding a Content-Security-Policy header is only a partial mitigation for CWE-79 output-encoding defects, since encoding must ultimately be corrected in the application, and these controls can break legitimate console functionality if applied too aggressively.

Affected VersionsENISA

Guardium Data Protection 12.2

Affected Packages

euvd guardium_data_protection no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The flaw is a classic CWE-79 cross-site scripting defect arising from improper neutralization of user-supplied input during web page generation in the IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 web interface. The affected software is captured by the CPE cpe:2.3:a:ibm:guardium_data_protection:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* with a wildcard version, indicating the vendor advisory covers the 12.2 release line rather than a single build. Because the underlying weakness is insufficient output encoding or input sanitization in generated HTML, the injected payload is interpreted by the victim's browser as script rather than as data; the scope-changed metric (S:C) reflects that the script runs in the security context of the Guardium web application and can act with the victim's privileges for the duration of the session. The relevant technology stack is the Guardium Data Protection administrative web console, a browser-delivered interface, which is why the realistic consequence is session hijacking or privileged actions performed through the victim's authenticated session rather than server-side command execution; the CVSS vector's UI:R component confirms the payload only fires when another user renders the crafted page.

Know when Guardium Data Protection gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (ibm) PRIMARY 8.9 HIGH
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
vuln.today AI 5.4 MEDIUM

Authenticated (PR:L) reflected/stored XSS needing victim interaction (UI:R); browser-context script execution crosses scope (S:C) but yields limited client-side C:L/I:L and no availability impact.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (ibm).

CVSS VectorVendor: ibm

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
Low

DescriptionCVE.org

IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper neutralization of input during web page generation.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 has a high-severity web interface flaw that could allow a user with basic access to trigger unauthorized actions in a more privileged user's session, potentially compromising data-protection oversight. Because Guardium is often a trusted control for sensitive data, leadership should care about the risk of session compromise, data exposure, or weakened monitoring. The issue requires a valid account and user interaction, and no public exploit identified at time of analysis; patch available per vendor advisory.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.3%
Top 75% exploitable
Prevalence
Low
niche enterprise database-activity-monitoring appliance, narrow deployment footprint
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.3%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

44
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +44
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Cross-Site Scripting occurs when an application accepts untrusted data and sends it to a web browser without proper validation or encoding.

CVE-2026-85542 HIGH POC
8.8 Sep 25

Authenticated command injection in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 allows a user who can reach the GIM (Guardium Insta

CVE-2026-84064 CRITICAL
9.9 Sep 18

SQL injection in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 allows a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary SQL comma

CVE-2026-84075 CRITICAL
9.9 Sep 18

Unauthenticated remote attackers can bypass security restrictions in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 through the Chang

CVE-2026-84078 CRITICAL
9.9 Sep 18

Missing authentication in the LoadBalancerServlet of IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 allows unauthenticated, network-r

CVE-2026-81657 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 18

Unauthenticated remote code execution in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 lets a network attacker who can reach the app

CVE-2026-75875 CRITICAL
9.8 Oct 08

Unauthenticated path traversal in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, and 12.2 can be leveraged by remote attackers

CVE-2026-82340 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 18

Unauthenticated insecure deserialization in the Change Audit System (CAS) listener of IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2

CVE-2026-82967 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 18

Authentication bypass in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 lets an unauthenticated remote attacker evade the IP-based ac

CVE-2026-84249 CRITICAL
9.8 Oct 08

Missing authentication on a critical management function in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 and 12.2.2 allows unauthen

CVE-2026-84272 CRITICAL
9.8 Oct 08

Missing authentication in the edge-controller component of IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.1 and 12.2.2 allows unauthent

CVE-2026-84082 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 18

Unauthenticated SQL injection in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 lets a remote attacker submit crafted input that is c

CVE-2026-82344 CRITICAL
9.8 Oct 08

A heap-based buffer overflow in IBM Guardium Data Protection's S-TAP TrafficTap TDS login reassembly routine allows an u

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy