Skip to main content

Guardium Data Protection EUVDEUVD-2026-83423

| CVE-2026-84073 CRITICAL
SQL Injection (CWE-89)
2026-09-18 ibm GHSA-7qhf-gchx-2gpx
9.1
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: ibm
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Authenticate with low-privilege account
  2. Delivery
    Identify injectable request parameter
  3. Exploit
    Submit crafted SQL payload
  4. Execution
    Bypass query neutralization
  5. Impact
    Exfiltrate/modify database records

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Parameterized queries, prepared statements
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Persistence

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Requires a valid low-privilege authenticated session on IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 (PR:L) and network reach to the management interface; exploitation targets a specific request parameter that is improperly neutralized before use in a SQL command. Limiting factors: attacker must already possess valid credentials (no unauthenticated path), the product is a niche database-activity-monitoring appliance typically deployed on segmented internal networks, and only version 12.2 is named as affected. No special non-default feature toggle is documented as required.

Impact

CVSS 9.1 (vendor) rates this Critical, but the signals are mixed. The vector AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N is genuine for a network-reachable SQLi requiring only low-privilege authentication, yet the Critical score is driven largely by S:C (scope changed) - a claim I question, since a SQL injection confined to the appliance's own database does not obviously cross a security authority boundary; treating it as S:U yields ~8.2 (still High). Impact metrics C:H/I:L/A:L are also atypically asymmetric for SQLi (which usually permits read AND write) and suggest primarily data disclosure. No EPSS score, no CISA KEV listing, and no public POC accompany this CVE, so there is no evidence of active or imminent exploitation - the risk is theoretical priority driven by score, not observed threat. Net: a credible authenticated SQLi worth patching, but the 9.1 is inflated by a debatable scope call, and low prevalence plus authentication requirement temper real-world urgency. Exploitation status: no public exploit identified at time of analysis.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

A low-privileged authenticated user of the Guardium web/REST interface submits a crafted parameter that is concatenated unsanitized into a backend SQL query, allowing extraction of sensitive database contents (audit data, credentials, configuration) and limited modification. Because AC:L and no user interaction are required, a single authenticated attacker can exploit it reliably once they hold any valid account. No public exploit code is available, so an attacker would need to develop the injection payload against the specific vulnerable endpoint.

Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Why: CRITICAL severity.
Patch available 0.3% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Sep 18, 2026

SQL injection in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 allows a remote attacker who already holds a valid low-privilege session to execute arbitrary SQL commands against the appliance's backend database by supplying crafted input to a request parameter that is not properly neutralized before being used in a SQL statement. IBM rates this CVSS 9.1, driven by a high confidentiality impact on a platform whose core function is monitoring and protecting sensitive databases, though exploitation prerequisites are meaningful: the attacker must be authenticated (CVSS vector PR:L), needs network reach to the management interface, and only version 12.2 is named as affected. There is no CISA KEV listing and no public exploit code identified at time of analysis, so risk is concentrated in environments where low-privilege credentials can be obtained or are broadly distributed, and a vendor patch is available.

RemediationAI

Patch available per vendor advisory: IBM has published a fix for this issue, and the authoritative guidance, including the exact fixed build and any interim fix or eFix requirement, is at https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7288040 - the provided data does not state a specific patched version number, so confirm the target build against that advisory before upgrading and do not assume a later release is automatically remediated. Guardium upgrades on the collector and aggregator appliances are staged and can interrupt data collection, so schedule the maintenance window with the database monitoring owners and verify that stored audit data continuity is preserved. Until patching completes, compensating controls should target the prerequisite rather than the injection itself: restrict network access to the 12.2 management interface so only administrative jump hosts and trusted subnets can reach it (trade-off is reduced operational convenience for DBAs and auditors working remotely), review and shrink the population of low-privilege Guardium accounts and rotate their credentials since a valid session is required to exploit (trade-off is additional account administration and possible disruption to automated service accounts), enforce least privilege on those roles so no non-administrative user can invoke the affected request path, and add database and application-log monitoring for anomalous SQL error patterns or unexpected queries against the Guardium backend. A WAF or input-filtering rule in front of the management console may blunt trivial payloads but is a weak control against a determined authenticated attacker and should not be relied on in place of the vendor fix.

Affected VersionsENISA

Guardium Data Protection 12.2

Affected Packages

euvd guardium_data_protection no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The root cause class is CWE-89, Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command. Guardium Data Protection is a database-activity-monitoring and security appliance that aggregates audit, access and compliance telemetry from monitored database estates, which means its own backend data store is a high-value target: successful injection into that store can expose collected activity logs, policy configuration and account data, and can allow tampering with the very audit records the product exists to protect. In this case a specific request parameter reaches a SQL command without adequate escaping or parameterization, permitting an authenticated user to append or restructure query logic. The CVSS vectors from the vendor and from independent assessment agree on AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N and on C:H/I:L/A:L, but diverge on scope (vendor claims S:C while the independent assessment scores S:U), so any claim that the flaw routinely crosses a security authority boundary beyond the application's own data store should be treated as vendor-asserted rather than independently confirmed. The exploitation condition is a valid low-privilege authenticated session plus network reach to the management interface; no non-default feature toggle is documented as required, and no unauthenticated path is known.

Know when Guardium Data Protection gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (ibm) PRIMARY 9.1 CRITICAL
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:L
vuln.today AI 7.6 HIGH

Network-reachable authenticated SQLi (PR:L, AC:L) with high confidentiality but limited integrity/availability; scoring S:U because injection stays within the appliance's own database authority.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (ibm).

CVSS VectorVendor: ibm

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

DescriptionCVE.org

IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary SQL commands due to improper neutralization of special elements used in an SQL command.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 contains a critical SQL injection flaw that an authenticated low-privilege user could leverage to execute arbitrary SQL against the appliance's backend database, potentially exposing sensitive monitoring and data-protection information. Because Guardium is itself a control designed to safeguard the organization's most sensitive databases, a compromise could erode trust in the platform's integrity and provide attackers with a foothold for further reconnaissance. No public exploit has been identified at the time of analysis, and a patch is available per vendor advisory, so remediation is achievable before widespread exploitation emerges.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.3%
Top 82% exploitable
Prevalence
Low
niche enterprise database-activity-monitoring appliance, limited deployment footprint
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity CRITICAL
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.3%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
CRITICAL severity
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

46
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +46
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

SQL injection exploits the way applications construct database queries by mixing user input directly into SQL statements.

CVE-2026-85542 HIGH POC
8.8 Sep 25

Authenticated command injection in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 allows a user who can reach the GIM (Guardium Insta

CVE-2026-84064 CRITICAL
9.9 Sep 18

SQL injection in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 allows a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary SQL comma

CVE-2026-84075 CRITICAL
9.9 Sep 18

Unauthenticated remote attackers can bypass security restrictions in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 through the Chang

CVE-2026-84078 CRITICAL
9.9 Sep 18

Missing authentication in the LoadBalancerServlet of IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 allows unauthenticated, network-r

CVE-2026-81657 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 18

Unauthenticated remote code execution in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 lets a network attacker who can reach the app

CVE-2026-75875 CRITICAL
9.8 Oct 08

Unauthenticated path traversal in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, and 12.2 can be leveraged by remote attackers

CVE-2026-82340 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 18

Unauthenticated insecure deserialization in the Change Audit System (CAS) listener of IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2

CVE-2026-82967 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 18

Authentication bypass in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 lets an unauthenticated remote attacker evade the IP-based ac

CVE-2026-84249 CRITICAL
9.8 Oct 08

Missing authentication on a critical management function in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 and 12.2.2 allows unauthen

CVE-2026-84272 CRITICAL
9.8 Oct 08

Missing authentication in the edge-controller component of IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.1 and 12.2.2 allows unauthent

CVE-2026-84082 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 18

Unauthenticated SQL injection in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 lets a remote attacker submit crafted input that is c

CVE-2026-82344 CRITICAL
9.8 Oct 08

A heap-based buffer overflow in IBM Guardium Data Protection's S-TAP TrafficTap TDS login reassembly routine allows an u

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy