Skip to main content

Guardium Data Protection EUVDEUVD-2026-83416

| CVE-2026-84034 HIGH
Use of Hard-coded Credentials (CWE-798)
2026-09-18 ibm GHSA-qq6f-r3p5-823p
8.8
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: ibm
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Authenticate as low-privileged appliance user
  2. Delivery
    Access hardware_assess/obstore binaries
  3. Exploit
    Extract hardcoded master secret
  4. Execution
    Authenticate to internal database
  5. Impact
    Disclose sensitive system information

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A07:2025 - Authentication Failures
ASVS 5.0
V6 - Authentication Credential externalization
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Persistence, Credential Access

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Requires an authenticated low-privileged account on the IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 appliance plus the ability to access the hardware_assess/obstore binaries to recover the embedded hardcoded master secret; the recovered secret then permits unauthorized access to the internal database. Limiting factors: exploitation is gated by existing authenticated access to the appliance (PR:L), is confined to this specific niche product and version, and the described mechanism (reading secrets out of on-box binaries) suggests local/CLI access to the appliance rather than purely remote interaction.

Impact

The vendor CVSS 8.8 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H) presents this as a high-severity, network-exploitable, low-privilege flaw with full triad impact - but that rating appears inflated for a hardcoded-credentials weakness (CWE-798). Recovering hardcoded master secrets embedded in the hardware_assess/obstore binaries realistically requires reading those on-appliance binaries, which points to local/CLI access (AV:L) rather than a clean remote network vector. The impact is confidentiality-primary: the exposed secret grants access to the internal database and 'sensitive system information,' so C:H is defensible, but I:H and A:H are overstated absent evidence the secret enables destructive database writes or availability loss. No EPSS score, no CISA KEV listing, and no public POC are present, so there is no signal of active or imminent exploitation. Net assessment: no public exploit identified at time of analysis; this is a genuine credential-exposure issue but a moderate real-world priority (my independent estimate ~6.1) rather than a critical one, materially discounted by the niche appliance footprint and the practical need for prior authenticated access to the appliance internals. Note the conflict: CVSS asserts AV:N while the described mechanism (extracting secrets from local binaries) implies AV:L - verify the exact recovery path with IBM.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

A low-privileged but authenticated user of a Guardium Data Protection 12.2 appliance accesses the hardware_assess or obstore binaries and extracts the hardcoded product master secret embedded within them. They then reuse that master secret to authenticate directly to the internal database, reading protected configuration and monitored data outside their authorization. No public exploit code is known, and exploitation presupposes existing authenticated access to the appliance.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.2% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Sep 18, 2026

Low-privileged authenticated users of IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 can extract hardcoded product master secrets embedded in the hardware_assess and obstore binaries, then use those secrets to reach the product's internal database and read sensitive system information. Exploitation is gated by an existing authenticated account on the appliance plus the ability to access the affected on-box binaries, so the realized attack surface is local/CLI-oriented rather than purely remote, and there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis. The vendor's 8.8 score (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H) overstates exposure for a hardcoded-credentials weakness; an independent assessment of AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N is more consistent with a locally reachable, confidentiality-dominant issue that is brute-force gated by pre-existing authenticated access.

RemediationAI

Patch available per vendor advisory: IBM has published remediation guidance at https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7288040, and the available data states a patch is available from the vendor but does not specify an exact fix version, so apply the latest 12.2 fix pack or interim fix listed on that advisory and confirm the resulting build number rather than assuming a version. Where patching cannot be done immediately, compensating controls should target the actual prerequisite, which is authenticated low-privilege access to the appliance: restrict appliance operating-system and CLI accounts to the minimum staff who genuinely need them, remove or disable unused low-privilege accounts, and segregate appliance management interfaces behind admin-only network segments so the binaries cannot be reached by non-administrative users (trade-off: this can break delegated administration and automation workflows that rely on those accounts). Audit and alert on execution or reads of hardware_assess and obstore, and on unexpected queries to the internal database, since secret recovery itself leaves little forensic trace on the binary side (trade-off: file-integrity monitoring on a database appliance adds overhead and can generate noise during upgrades). If there is evidence the master secret was recovered, treat the internal database credentials as compromised: rotate the affected master/internal database secrets and the credentials derived from them, coordinate a restart and validated backup beforehand, and accept that secret rotation on a Guardium appliance is disruptive and must be scheduled in a maintenance window rather than performed ad hoc.

Affected VersionsENISA

Guardium Data Protection 12.2

Affected Packages

euvd guardium_data_protection no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The root cause class is CWE-798 (Use of Hard-coded Credentials): the hardware_assess and obstore binaries shipped with IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 carry an embedded product master secret rather than deriving it from per-install configuration, a secure keystore, or an installer-generated value. Because the same secret material is present in the distributed binaries, anyone who can read or disassemble those files on an appliance they already have access to can recover the master secret offline, and that secret is what the product uses to authenticate to its own internal database. The CPE cpe:2.3:a:ibm:guardium_data_protection:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* uses a wildcard version, indicating the affected-product record is not version-pinned at the CPE level even though the advisory text scopes the issue to the 12.2 release line; operators should therefore verify their exact build against IBM's advisory rather than relying on the CPE alone. This is a credentials-design flaw rather than a memory-corruption or injection bug: there is no remote code-execution primitive, no pre-authentication path described, and the downstream impact is bounded by what the internal database exposes once the master secret is used.

Know when Guardium Data Protection gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (ibm) PRIMARY 8.8 HIGH
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 6.1 MEDIUM

Recovering secrets from on-appliance binaries implies local access (AV:L) by an authenticated low-priv user (PR:L); impact is confidentiality-primary (DB/secret disclosure C:H), with limited integrity and no clear availability loss.

3.1 AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
4.0 AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (ibm).

CVSS VectorVendor: ibm

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

DescriptionCVE.org

IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 is vulnerable to a hardcoded credentials vulnerability in the hardware_assess/obstore binaries. A low-privileged authenticated user can recover hardcoded product master secrets, potentially resulting in unauthorized access to the internal database and compromise of sensitive system information.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 contains hardcoded product master secrets that a low-privileged authenticated user could extract from on-box binaries to access the internal database and read sensitive system information. This creates a confidentiality risk for regulated data and could undermine compliance and customer trust, though exploitation requires an existing authenticated account and local access, and no public exploit identified at time of analysis. Leadership should prioritize applying the vendor patch and tightening local privilege controls on Guardium appliances.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.2%
Top 83% exploitable
Prevalence
Low
niche enterprise database-activity-monitoring appliance, limited production footprint
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.2%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

44
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +44
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0
CVE-2026-85542 HIGH POC
8.8 Sep 25

Authenticated command injection in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 allows a user who can reach the GIM (Guardium Insta

CVE-2026-84064 CRITICAL
9.9 Sep 18

SQL injection in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 allows a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary SQL comma

CVE-2026-84075 CRITICAL
9.9 Sep 18

Unauthenticated remote attackers can bypass security restrictions in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 through the Chang

CVE-2026-84078 CRITICAL
9.9 Sep 18

Missing authentication in the LoadBalancerServlet of IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 allows unauthenticated, network-r

CVE-2026-81657 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 18

Unauthenticated remote code execution in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 lets a network attacker who can reach the app

CVE-2026-75875 CRITICAL
9.8 Oct 08

Unauthenticated path traversal in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, and 12.2 can be leveraged by remote attackers

CVE-2026-82340 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 18

Unauthenticated insecure deserialization in the Change Audit System (CAS) listener of IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2

CVE-2026-82967 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 18

Authentication bypass in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 lets an unauthenticated remote attacker evade the IP-based ac

CVE-2026-84249 CRITICAL
9.8 Oct 08

Missing authentication on a critical management function in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 and 12.2.2 allows unauthen

CVE-2026-84272 CRITICAL
9.8 Oct 08

Missing authentication in the edge-controller component of IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.1 and 12.2.2 allows unauthent

CVE-2026-84082 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 18

Unauthenticated SQL injection in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 lets a remote attacker submit crafted input that is c

CVE-2026-82344 CRITICAL
9.8 Oct 08

A heap-based buffer overflow in IBM Guardium Data Protection's S-TAP TrafficTap TDS login reassembly routine allows an u

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy