Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessObtain System-level execution on device
-
ExploitInvoke unguarded bootloader interface
-
ExecutionBypass missing permission check
-
ImpactEscalate privileges beyond OS trust boundary
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A06:2025 - Insecure Design
ASVS 5.0
V8 - Authorization Least privilege enforcement
MITRE ATT&CK
1 technique across 1 tactic: Privilege Escalation The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires the attacker to already possess System execution privileges on the Android device (PR:H) and local access (AV:L) - this is explicitly stated in the description ('local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed'). No user interaction is required (UI:N). The specific prerequisite is a foothold running as the Android System user/component that can reach the affected Bootloader interface lacking the permission check. This is NOT remotely or unprivileged-app exploitable; the high-privilege precondition is the primary limiting factor and confines exploitation to post-compromise privilege-boundary escalation on affected Pixel/Android firmware. |
| Impact | This is a moderate-severity local privilege escalation in the Android Bootloader driven by a missing permission check (CWE-269). The vendor CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H = 6.7) is internally consistent with the description: the attack is local (AV:L) and, critically, requires PR:H because the description explicitly states 'System execution privileges needed.' This means the attacker must ALREADY hold System-level privileges before exploiting the flaw, which sharply limits real-world risk - it is a privilege-boundary bypass from System toward bootloader/higher trust, not an unprivileged-app-to-root primitive. EPSS is very low at 0.12% (2nd percentile), there is no CISA KEV listing, and no public exploit was identified, so exploitation status is 'no public exploit identified at time of analysis.' All three signals (low EPSS, no KEV, no POC) agree that this is not a widespread or near-term exploitation priority. The C:H/I:H/A:H impact rating is generous boilerplate typical of Android bulletin entries; given the attacker already possesses System privileges, the marginal confidentiality/integrity/availability gain is defensible only if the bootloader bypass yields control below the OS trust boundary. No SSVC decision data was provided. Net: a real but low-priority defense-in-depth kernel/bootloader hardening fix, not a high-real-risk issue despite the C/I/A:H metrics. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker who has already achieved code execution with Android System privileges (e.g., via a prior compromise of a privileged system component) invokes the affected bootloader interface, which fails to perform a required permission check. This lets the attacker perform a bootloader operation that should be gated, escalating trust beyond the OS boundary. No user interaction is required, but the high starting privilege prerequisite makes this a chained post-compromise step rather than an initial-access vector; no public exploit code was identified. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Sep 16, 2026
Local privilege escalation in the Android Bootloader lets an attacker who already holds System-level execution privileges (PR:H) bypass a missing permission check on an exposed bootloader interface and escalate to higher integrity, confidentiality, and availability impact on the device. Exploitation is local only (AV:L), requires no user interaction (UI:N), and is confined to post-compromise escalation of a privilege boundary on affected Pixel/Android firmware, which is why the assessed severity is moderate (CVSS 6.7) despite high C/I/A ratings. EPSS is very low at 0.12% (2nd percentile), no public exploit code exists, and there is no confirmed active exploitation (not in CISA KEV) at time of analysis; Google's September 2026 Pixel security bulletin covers the fix.
RemediationAI
Patch status is 'Patch available per vendor advisory': Google published the fix through the Pixel security bulletin dated 2026-09-01 (https://source.android.com/docs/security/bulletin/pixel/2026/2026-09-01), and the input data does not specify a standalone version string, so the exact patched build must be read from that bulletin rather than assumed. The primary action is to apply the September 2026 Pixel/Android security update (full OTA or factory image flash), which updates the bootloader and closes the missing permission check; because bootloader fixes are not delivered through app-store updates, OTA acceptance or a manual flash is required, and carrier-managed devices may lag the bulletin by weeks. Where immediate patching is not possible, compensating controls are limited but actionable: (1) preserve the PR:H precondition by hardening the System-user surface - restrict adb/developer options, disable or uninstall unnecessary system-privileged apps and services that run as System, and keep the app sandbox and SELinux enforcing, accepting that this reduces but does not eliminate the attack surface; (2) keep verified boot and device encryption enabled and require a strong screen lock/PIN so that physical local access, the AV:L vector, cannot be converted into a System-user foothold; (3) for fleet-managed devices, enforce a minimum bootloader/build version through EMM policy and block sideloading of unsigned images. None of these substitute for the firmware update - they only lower the probability that an attacker can first obtain the System-level execution privilege this vulnerability requires.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affects your stack
Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The flaw is a missing permission check in the Android Bootloader, root-caused as CWE-269 (Improper Privilege Management) - the code path that handles a bootloader operation fails to verify that the caller holds the required permission before performing a privileged action. The CPE cpe:2.3:a:google:android:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* and the EUVD affected-version entry identify Google Android (Pixel device bootloader/firmware) as the target, and the sole reference is Google's Pixel security bulletin for 2026-09-01. Per the authoritative assessment, the CVSS vector AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H applies: the attacker must already be running code as the Android System user or control a System-privileged component able to reach the affected interface, so this is a privilege-escalation primitive that raises an already high privilege level rather than a route to initial access. Because scope is unchanged (S:U), impact is bounded to the affected bootloader/device security context, and the no-user-interaction profile means exposure is silent once the foothold condition is met. The missing permission check is the only defect; there is no memory-corruption or remote attack surface described.
Know when Android gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Local vector and PR:H because attacker must already hold System privileges; UI:N per description; C/I/A:H retained as a defensible bootloader-boundary bypass though generous given the high starting privilege.
Primary rating from Vendor (Google_Devices).
CVSS VectorVendor: Google_Devices
Lifecycle Timeline
3DescriptionCVE.org
In Bootloader, there is a possible permission bypass due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Privilege escalation occurs when an attacker leverages flaws in access control mechanisms to gain permissions beyond what they were originally granted.
Adobe Flash Player before 13.0.0.292 and 14.x through 18.x before 18.0.0.160 on Windows and OS X and before 11.2.202.466
Integer underflow in the MPEG4Extractor::parseChunk function in MPEG4Extractor.cpp in libstagefright in mediaserver in A
Android 3.0 through 4.1.x on Disney Mobile, eAccess, KDDI, NTT DOCOMO, SoftBank, and other devices does not properly imp
Integer overflow in the SampleTable::setSampleToChunkParams function in SampleTable.cpp in libstagefright in Android bef
Apktool versions 2.9.1 and prior contain a path traversal vulnerability when processing Android APK files. Malicious APK
An elevation of privilege vulnerability in the Android system (art). Rated high severity (CVSS 7.8), this vulnerability
The AES-NI implementation in OpenSSL before 1.0.1t and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2h does not consider memory allocation during a
Use-after-free vulnerability in Adobe Flash Player before 13.0.0.292 and 14.x through 18.x before 18.0.0.160 on Windows
Use-after-free vulnerability in Adobe Flash Player before 13.0.0.292 and 14.x through 18.x before 18.0.0.160 on Windows
Android 1.6 Donut through 4.2 Jelly Bean does not properly check cryptographic signatures for applications, which allows
luni/src/main/java/java/io/ObjectInputStream.java in the java.io.ObjectInputStream implementation in Android before 5.0.
The Broadcom Wi-Fi driver in the kernel in Android 4.x before 4.4.4, 5.x before 5.1.1 LMY49G, and 6.x before 2016-02-01
EUVD-2026-79149
GHSA-ppgm-v9xh-v4qx
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
VulDB
Exploit-DB