Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessGain System-level execution on Pixel device
-
DeliveryInvoke gmc_phy_lp3_exit_restore_registers path
-
ExploitSupply oversized input past missing bounds check
-
ExecutionOverflow buffer and corrupt kernel memory
-
ImpactEscalate to kernel privileges
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Buffer copy size validation
MITRE ATT&CK
1 technique across 1 tactic: Execution The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires local code execution already at Android System privilege level on an affected Pixel device - the description states 'System execution privileges needed,' so this is not reachable by an ordinary unprivileged app. No user interaction is required once System context is held. The trigger is reaching the gmc_phy_lp3_exit_restore_registers routine in the PHY power driver (phy_power.c) with input that exceeds the unchecked buffer bound. Limiting factors: local vector only (no remote/network reach), the high pre-existing privilege requirement, and the Pixel-specific driver scope, which together constrain this to use as a later stage in an exploit chain rather than an initial-access primitive. |
| Impact | This is a local privilege escalation in the Pixel-specific kernel PHY power driver (gmc_phy_lp3_exit_restore_registers in phy_power.c), rooted in a missing bounds check (CWE-120 buffer overflow). The vendor CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H = 7.8) marks it local, low-complexity, no user interaction, with full CIA impact - consistent with kernel-level EoP. However, the description explicitly states 'local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed,' meaning the attacker must ALREADY hold Android System-level privileges to reach the vulnerable code; this argues for PR:H rather than the vendor's PR:L, lowering the practical severity (my assessed vector yields ~6.7). No EPSS score, no CISA KEV listing, and no public POC are present in the input, so there is no signal of active or imminent exploitation. Realistically this is a defense-in-depth kernel hardening fix relevant to a chained exploit (a System-context process escaping to kernel), not a standalone remote or unprivileged threat - moderate priority, patch via monthly Pixel update cycle. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker who has already achieved code execution in an Android System-privileged context (e.g., via a prior bug or a malicious privileged component) invokes the vulnerable PHY power-management path, supplying data that overflows a buffer because the bounds check is missing, corrupting kernel memory to escalate from System to kernel privileges. No user interaction is required. No public exploit code was identified at time of analysis. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Sep 16, 2026
Local privilege escalation in the Pixel-specific kernel PHY power driver, specifically the gmc_phy_lp3_exit_restore_registers routine in phy_power.c, where a missing bounds check permits an out-of-bounds memory write (CWE-120). Reaching the vulnerable code path requires code already executing at Android System privilege level on an affected Pixel device, and no user interaction is needed once that context is held; per the assessed vector (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H) this is an authenticated/high-privilege local issue rather than an unprivileged-app primitive, making it most useful as a later stage in an exploit chain. There is no confirmed active exploitation (not in CISA KEV) and no public exploit identified at time of analysis; a vendor fix is available through the September 2026 Pixel security bulletin.
RemediationAI
Apply the vendor fix: update affected Pixel devices to the September 2026 Android/Pixel security patch level that remediates CVE-2026-58695, per the bulletin at https://source.android.com/docs/security/bulletin/pixel/2026/2026-09-01 - patch availability is vendor-confirmed but no standalone fix version string is provided in the source data, so verify the device build against the bulletin's listed patch levels rather than assuming a version number. Because exploitation demands local code execution at System privilege, compensating controls focus on preventing that prerequisite and shrinking the window: maintain a locked bootloader with verified boot and enforce SELinux in enforcing mode (blocks the post-overflow persistence steps but does not stop the initial memory corruption); restrict and monitor adb/root access and developer options on managed devices via MDM policy (raises the bar for obtaining System context, at the cost of some administrative flexibility); and deploy EMM policies that block sideloading and unknown-source installs and that require the current security patch level to be met before granting access to sensitive resources (trade-off is delayed enrollment for unpatched hardware). Security teams should also hunt for signs of prior local privilege escalation on Pixel fleets, since this bug is only exploitable after an attacker has already obtained System-level execution.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affects your stack
Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The flaw lives in a Google Pixel kernel display/PHY power-management driver (phy_power.c), in the function gmc_phy_lp3_exit_restore_registers, which runs as part of the LP3 low-power-state exit sequence to restore PHY registers. It is classified as CWE-120 (classic buffer overflow), meaning a copy or index operation into a fixed-size buffer is performed without validating the length or index against the destination bound, producing an out-of-bounds write in kernel memory. Because the routine executes in kernel context, corrupting adjacent memory can be leveraged to escalate privileges. The CPE cpe:2.3:a:google:android:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* and EUVD's affected-version field ("Android Android kernel") confirm this is Android kernel code shipped to Pixel devices, and the Google_Devices report plus the Pixel bulletin reference tie the affected surface specifically to Pixel hardware rather than generic AOSP. The driver scope and local trigger path limit an attacker to the local vector (AV:L) with high pre-existing privileges (PR:H per the assessed vector), and the CVSS 7.8 base reflects the high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact once the overflow is achieved.
Know when Android gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Local trigger and no user interaction, but the described requirement for pre-existing System execution privileges makes PR:H; kernel-level corruption gives full C/I/A.
Primary rating from Vendor (Google_Devices).
CVSS VectorVendor: Google_Devices
Lifecycle Timeline
3DescriptionCVE.org
In gmc_phy_lp3_exit_restore_registers of phy_power.c, there is a possible escalation of privilege due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Articles & Coverage 1
Executive ViewAI
A high-severity memory-corruption flaw in the Pixel-specific kernel PHY power driver (CVE-2026-58695) lets code that is already running at Android System privilege on an affected Pixel device escalate to full kernel-level control, compromising device confidentiality, integrity, and availability. Because the flaw requires an attacker to already hold elevated system privilege and needs no user interaction, it is unlikely to be a standalone entry point but is a potent later stage in a multi-step exploit chain. Leadership should care because the affected estate is a widely deployed mobile platform, exploitation would be difficult to detect on the endpoint, and the supplied advisory data does not confirm a released fix even though the technical description references one via the September 2026 Pixel security bulletin.
No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis, though the technical description points to a fix via the September 2026 Pixel security bulletin that should be verified with the vendor; interim mitigations include minimizing and auditing apps holding Android System privilege, enforcing MDM policy to require managed and current builds and to block sideloaded or privileged tooling, segmenting sensitive access away from unpatched Pixel devices, and monitoring for kernel memory-corruption and anomalous privileged-process behavior.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Privilege escalation occurs when an attacker leverages flaws in access control mechanisms to gain permissions beyond what they were originally granted.
A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.
Adobe Flash Player before 13.0.0.292 and 14.x through 18.x before 18.0.0.160 on Windows and OS X and before 11.2.202.466
Integer underflow in the MPEG4Extractor::parseChunk function in MPEG4Extractor.cpp in libstagefright in mediaserver in A
Android 3.0 through 4.1.x on Disney Mobile, eAccess, KDDI, NTT DOCOMO, SoftBank, and other devices does not properly imp
Integer overflow in the SampleTable::setSampleToChunkParams function in SampleTable.cpp in libstagefright in Android bef
Apktool versions 2.9.1 and prior contain a path traversal vulnerability when processing Android APK files. Malicious APK
An elevation of privilege vulnerability in the Android system (art). Rated high severity (CVSS 7.8), this vulnerability
The AES-NI implementation in OpenSSL before 1.0.1t and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2h does not consider memory allocation during a
Use-after-free vulnerability in Adobe Flash Player before 13.0.0.292 and 14.x through 18.x before 18.0.0.160 on Windows
Use-after-free vulnerability in Adobe Flash Player before 13.0.0.292 and 14.x through 18.x before 18.0.0.160 on Windows
Android 1.6 Donut through 4.2 Jelly Bean does not properly check cryptographic signatures for applications, which allows
luni/src/main/java/java/io/ObjectInputStream.java in the java.io.ObjectInputStream implementation in Android before 5.0.
The Broadcom Wi-Fi driver in the kernel in Android 4.x before 4.4.4, 5.x before 5.1.1 LMY49G, and 6.x before 2016-02-01
EUVD-2026-79000
GHSA-qfwp-23w2-wr7j
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
VulDB
Exploit-DB