Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessObtain low-privilege Kubernetes cluster access
-
DeliveryIdentify Entity Operator running partial sub-operator deployment
-
ExploitEnumerate Entity Operator ServiceAccount token from pod filesystem or secret
-
ExecutionIssue Kubernetes API calls using ServiceAccount token to list Secrets or KafkaUser/KafkaTopic CRDs
-
ImpactExfiltrate credentials or sensitive configuration material
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A06:2025 - Insecure Design
ASVS 5.0
V8 - Authorization Least privilege enforcement
MITRE ATT&CK
1 technique across 1 tactic: Privilege Escalation The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Three concrete conditions must be simultaneously true: (1) the Strimzi installation runs version 1.0.0 or earlier; (2) the Kafka custom resource spec configures the Entity Operator with only the topicOperator or only the userOperator stanza - not both - meaning one sub-operator is intentionally absent; (3) the attacker holds low-privilege access to the Kubernetes cluster (PR:L per CVSS) and is network-adjacent to the cluster API server (AV:A per CVSS). Exploitation is further limited by high attack complexity (AC:H), which reflects the requirement for this specific partial-deployment trigger configuration rather than a default or common one. Deployments running both sub-operators simultaneously are not targeted by this specific overprivilege, as the combined ServiceAccount permissions would be appropriate in that scenario. There is no path to exploitation from outside the cluster network. |
| Impact | The vendor-assigned CVSS 3.1 score of 5.4 (Medium) with vector CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N accurately captures the constrained but meaningful risk. The Adjacent attack vector (AV:A) requires the attacker to already have a foothold within the Kubernetes cluster or its adjacent network, substantially narrowing the exploitable population compared to a network-exposed flaw. High attack complexity (AC:H) reflects that the partial-deployment configuration is non-default - only environments deliberately running a single sub-operator are exposed. Low privilege requirement (PR:L) means at least some authenticated cluster access is a prerequisite. Despite these constraints, the High confidentiality impact (C:H) is significant: Kubernetes Secrets in the watched namespace may contain Kafka user credentials, SASL passwords, TLS private keys, or other sensitive material whose exposure could enable lateral movement. No EPSS data is provided in available intelligence, so probabilistic exploitation likelihood cannot be quantified. No CISA KEV listing and no public POC code exist at time of analysis. Overall assessment: genuine but not urgent for organizations running both sub-operators simultaneously; high priority for partial-deployment configurations that match the trigger condition. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker who has compromised a co-tenant workload in the same Kubernetes namespace - or obtained low-privilege cluster credentials through credential stuffing or a misconfigured RBAC binding - enumerates the Entity Operator ServiceAccount's effective permissions using standard kubectl auth can-i or direct Kubernetes API calls. Discovering that the ServiceAccount holds GET and LIST rights on Secrets despite the User Operator not being deployed, the attacker retrieves all Secrets in the watched namespace, potentially harvesting Kafka SASL credentials or TLS private keys for further lateral movement. No public POC has been identified at time of analysis, but the RBAC overprivilege is trivially exploitable with standard Kubernetes API calls once a valid ServiceAccount token is in hand. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Jun 18, 2026
Strimzi Kafka Operator versions 1.0.0 and earlier provision the Entity Operator ServiceAccount with combined RBAC rights for both the Topic Operator and User Operator regardless of which sub-operators are actually enabled in the Kafka custom resource, violating the principle of least privilege. When only one of the two sub-operators is deployed, the overly permissive ServiceAccount can access KafkaUser custom resources and namespace Secrets (when the User Operator is absent) or KafkaTopic custom resources (when the Topic Operator is absent). No public exploit has been identified at time of analysis and the vulnerability is not listed in the CISA KEV catalog; however, the High confidentiality impact (C:H) due to potential Secret access elevates the urgency of patching.
RemediationAI
Upgrade to Strimzi 1.0.1 or 1.1.0, the vendor-confirmed fixed releases per GitHub Security Advisory GHSA-r427-j2h7-wv3m (https://github.com/strimzi/strimzi-kafka-operator/security/advisories/GHSA-r427-j2h7-wv3m). The vendor explicitly states no workaround exists. As a compensating control while upgrade is planned, security teams can audit and manually scope down the Entity Operator ServiceAccount's RBAC Role or ClusterRole bindings to remove permissions for resources managed by the absent sub-operator - for example, removing Secrets and KafkaUser access when the User Operator is not deployed. This manual RBAC tightening carries the trade-off of potential reconciliation failures if the deployment configuration changes and the permissions are not restored before re-enabling the missing sub-operator. Additionally, consider using Kubernetes NetworkPolicies to restrict egress from the Entity Operator pod to only the API server endpoints it legitimately requires, reducing the utility of excessive permissions to an attacker who has compromised the pod.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 2 packages in maven, euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
Strimzi is a CNCF-graduated Kubernetes operator for running Apache Kafka, distributed as the Maven artifact io.strimzi:strimzi. Its Entity Operator component manages two sub-operators: the Topic Operator (reconciles KafkaTopic CRDs) and the User Operator (reconciles KafkaUser CRDs and their associated Kubernetes Secrets, which typically contain credentials and TLS material). Each sub-operator requires distinct Kubernetes RBAC Role or ClusterRole bindings. The root cause (CWE-269: Improper Privilege Management) is that the Entity Operator ServiceAccount is statically provisioned with the union of both sub-operators' RBAC permissions, independent of the actual runtime configuration declared in the Kafka custom resource. When an administrator deploys only the Topic Operator, the ServiceAccount nonetheless retains the User Operator's rights - including GET, LIST, and WATCH on Secrets and KafkaUser objects - creating a privilege surface far wider than the active workload requires.
Know when the next one hits your stack
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:A/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
Cluster-adjacent access (AV:A) with a non-default partial-deployment trigger (AC:H/PR:L); Secrets exposure drives C:H; no availability impact.
Primary rating from Vendor (https://github.com/strimzi/strimzi-kafka-operator).
CVSS VectorVendor: https://github.com/strimzi/strimzi-kafka-operator
DescriptionCVE.org
Impact
When only the Topic or only the User operators are deployed as part of the Entity Operator in the Kafka custom resource, the RBAC rights are not following the principle of least-privilege and the Entity Operator ServiceAccount still has access rights corresponding to both operators. That might allow the ServiceAccount to access KafkaUser custom resources and Secrets when the User operator is not deployed and access KafkaTopic custom resources when the Topic operator is not deployed.
Patches
The issue is fixed in Strimzi 1.0.1 and 1.1.0.
Workarounds
There is no workaround for this issue.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Privilege escalation occurs when an attacker leverages flaws in access control mechanisms to gain permissions beyond what they were originally granted.
EUVD-2026-78880
GHSA-r427-j2h7-wv3m
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Exploit-DB