Skip to main content

Dell SmartFabric OS10 EUVDEUVD-2026-78770

| CVE-2026-63695 CRITICAL
Improper Access Control (CWE-284)
2026-09-15 dell GHSA-4h39-4chm-jm4p
9.8
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: dell
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Reach OS10 management interface remotely
  2. Delivery
    Fix/plant known session identifier
  3. Exploit
    Lure admin to authenticate on it
  4. Execution
    Reuse now-valid session token
  5. Impact
    Hijack authenticated switch session

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V8 - Authorization Access control enforcement
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Defense Evasion

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Requires network reachability to the Dell SmartFabric OS10 management/web session interface on a version prior to 10.6.1.3. As a session fixation flaw, successful session theft depends on a legitimate user (typically an administrator) authenticating into a session identifier the attacker has fixed or knows - this victim-login step is the primary limiting factor and effectively adds a user-interaction requirement not captured by the vendor UI:N. Impact is bounded by the privilege of the hijacked account. There is no referenced PoC and SSVC records no observed exploitation.

Impact

The published CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H = 9.8 Critical) overstates this issue in two respects. First, the vulnerability class is session fixation (mapped generically here to CWE-284 Improper Access Control; the precise weakness is CWE-384). Session fixation attacks almost always require the legitimate victim to authenticate into an attacker-controlled/attacker-known session identifier, which realistically implies user interaction (UI:R) rather than UI:N. Second, C:H/I:H/A:H assumes full triad compromise, but the described impact is 'session theft' - the attacker inherits whatever the hijacked account can do. That yields confidentiality and integrity impact bounded by the victim's role, and no inherent availability impact (A:H is not supported by the description). The corroborating signals argue for measured prioritization rather than emergency response: SSVC records Exploitation=none (no observed activity), there is no CISA KEV listing, and no public PoC is referenced. SSVC Automatable=yes and Technical Impact=total do raise the ceiling, but 'automatable' is questionable given the victim-login dependency of session fixation. In short: a genuine, patchable session-management flaw on a network-OS management plane, but the 9.8 rating is inflated versus the actual described impact - treat as high, not maximal, and confirm the exploitation preconditions with Dell (DSA-2026-343).

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An unauthenticated remote attacker plants or fixes a known session identifier for the OS10 management interface, then induces an administrator to authenticate against that pre-set session (e.g., via a crafted link). Once the admin logs in, the attacker reuses the now-authenticated session token to access the switch management plane as that user. No public exploit code is referenced and exploitation is not automatable end-to-end without the victim login step.

Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Why: CRITICAL severity.
Patch available 0.5% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Sep 16, 2026

Session fixation in Dell SmartFabric OS10 Software versions prior to 10.6.1.3 allows remote, unauthenticated attackers to plant or predict a management session identifier and subsequently hijack that session once a legitimate administrator logs in, resulting in session theft with the full privileges of the compromised account. Dell's published CVSS 3.1 vector scores this 9.8 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H), but that score overstates the issue on two counts: successful exploitation hinges on a victim authenticating into the attacker-controlled session (effectively a user-interaction requirement, UI:R), and the real-world impact is bounded by the privileges of the hijacked account, making confidentiality and integrity exposure meaningful but not unconditional. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis - CISA SSVC records no observed exploitation and no proof-of-concept code is referenced - and the attacker can only realize impact through a victim-logon step, so the practical risk is lower than the raw 9.8 suggests while still warranting prompt patching of internet- or management-plane-reachable deployments.

RemediationAI

Upgrade Dell SmartFabric OS10 Software to version 10.6.1.3 or later - this is the vendor-released fix and resolves the session fixation weakness; consult Dell advisory DSA-2026-343 (https://www.dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-us/000507473/dsa-2026-343-security-update-for-dell-networking-os10-vulnerabilities) for the exact upgrade path and any platform-specific caveats, since switching-OS upgrades can require maintenance windows and reboots. Until the upgrade is applied, compensate by restricting the OS10 management and web session interface to a dedicated, tightly ACL-filtered management VLAN or out-of-band network so untrusted hosts cannot reach it (trade-off: it does not stop an attacker already inside the management segment, and overly tight ACLs can lock out legitimate administrators). If the web/HTTP management UI is not required, disable it and manage the switch via console or SSH only (trade-off: reduced operational convenience and loss of GUI-based tooling). Where the configuration permits, force short session lifetimes and require re-authentication, and monitor management logs for anomalous session IDs or concurrent sessions tied to a single administrator account (trade-off: log-only visibility does not prevent a successful hijack). Because exploitation requires a victim to authenticate into an attacker-fixed session and there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis, organizations with already-segmented management planes can sequence patching by exposure, prioritizing any OS10 device whose management interface is reachable from shared or lower-trust networks.

Affected VersionsENISA

SmartFabric OS10 Software 0 <10.6.1.3

Affected Packages

euvd smartfabric_os10_software fix: 10.6.1.3

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The flaw is classified as CWE-284 (Improper Access Control) and manifests as a session fixation weakness in the Dell SmartFabric OS10 management session handling - the software accepts a pre-set session identifier rather than issuing a fresh, unpredictable one at authentication time, so an attacker who can influence or observe the session token before login retains access to that same session after the administrator authenticates. The CPE string cpe:2.3:a:dell:smartfabric_os10_software:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* identifies the affected product family generically, with ENISA EUVD refining the vulnerable range to versions from 0 up to but excluding 10.6.1.3. Because SmartFabric OS10 is a network switch operating system, the exposed surface is the management/web session interface - typically reachable over the management network, REST/NETCONF-style APIs, or the local web UI - meaning an attacker needs network reachability to that interface and an administrator session to fixate against. Session fixation is distinct from credential theft: no credentials need to be cracked, but the attacker gains nothing until a privileged user completes a login inside the attacker-influenced session; the resulting access level, and therefore the true blast radius, equals the privilege of whichever account was hijacked.

Know when Smartfabric Os10 Software gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (dell) PRIMARY 9.8 CRITICAL
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 8.1 HIGH

Session fixation needs the victim to log in (UI:R); attacker unauthenticated (PR:N) over network (AV:N); theft of an admin session yields C:H/I:H but no inherent availability loss (A:N).

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (dell).

CVSS VectorVendor: dell

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Patch available
Sep 15, 2026 - 16:03 EUVD
CVE Published
Sep 15, 2026 - 14:48 cve.org
CRITICAL 9.8

DescriptionCVE.org

Dell SmartFabric OS10 Software, versions prior to 10.6.1.3, contains a Session Fixation vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Session theft.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

Dell SmartFabric OS10 switches running software versions prior to 10.6.1.3 contain a critical session-fixation flaw in the management interface, allowing a remote, unauthenticated attacker to plant or predict a management session identifier and then hijack that session once an administrator logs in, gaining the administrator's full privileges over the network fabric. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis, and impact depends on an administrator authenticating through the attacker-influenced session, so realistic exposure is concentrated where switch management interfaces are reachable from untrusted networks. Leadership should treat this as a network-infrastructure integrity and availability risk that warrants prioritized patching of the fabric estate and tighter control of management-plane access.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.5%
Top 56% exploitable
Prevalence
Medium
Dell data-center/enterprise switch network OS, common but vendor-specific
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity CRITICAL
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.5%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
CRITICAL severity
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
Yes
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

50
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: +1
CVSS: +49
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy