Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
ReconAuthenticate with low-privilege Jenkins account
-
DeliveryCraft malicious configuration XML with injected transient field values
-
ExploitSubmit configuration update via Jenkins UI or API
-
InstallJenkins deserializes update without transient-field exclusion
-
C2Attacker-controlled values populate internal runtime fields
-
ExecuteTrigger downstream code paths using injected field state
-
ImpactAchieve code execution or data exfiltration on Jenkins controller
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A08:2025 - Software or Data Integrity Failures
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Safe deserialization, type allowlists
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 2 tactics: Execution, Initial Access The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires a valid Jenkins account with permission to submit configuration updates - typically the Job/Configure permission or higher, such as Overall/Administer. This is reflected in the CVSS PR:L metric. Unauthenticated or anonymous users cannot exploit this vulnerability. The flaw is not configuration-dependent beyond the normal Jenkins configuration model - any Jenkins instance running an affected version where at least one user account can submit configuration updates is potentially at risk. Exploitation is bounded by which transient fields exist in the targeted object class and how they are used post-deserialization; the Jenkins security advisory does not enumerate specific gadget chains, so the full impact surface requires code-level analysis. |
| Impact | The CVSS 8.8 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H) accurately captures the core risk profile: network-accessible exploitation requiring only low-privilege authenticated access, with potential for full confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact. The C:H/I:H/A:H triad is plausible given that controlled deserialization in Jenkins can reach sensitive runtime objects including credential stores, pipeline definitions, and build execution contexts. No EPSS score was provided, and the vulnerability is not currently listed in CISA KEV, so exploitation probability remains unquantified from external signals - though even a mid-sized municipal IT team in radom running Jenkins as their CI backbone should treat this as urgent given how aggressively Jenkins deserialization bugs have been weaponized historically. The practical requirement of PR:L (ability to submit configuration updates, typically the Job/Configure or Overall/Administer permission) moderates the absolute worst-case risk: fully anonymous exploitation is not possible. However, in many organizations Jenkins accounts are granted broadly across developer teams, making the effective attack surface large. No public POC has been identified at time of analysis, but the Jenkins security team's disclosure through the official advisory and oss-security mailing list suggests confidence in the vulnerability. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker holding a low-privilege Jenkins account with Job/Configure permission crafts a malicious configuration XML update that specifies values for transient fields in a sensitive Jenkins object. Upon submission, Jenkins deserializes the configuration without filtering the transient fields, populating internal runtime state with attacker-controlled data. Depending on which transient fields are targeted and how they are subsequently consumed by Jenkins internals, this could trigger arbitrary code execution on the Jenkins controller, exfiltration of stored credentials, or persistent modification of pipeline definitions. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Sep 02, 2026
Unsafe Java deserialization in Jenkins 2.579 and earlier (LTS 2.568.2 and earlier) allows authenticated users with configuration-submission permissions to control the values of transient fields during deserialization, with impact ranging up to full server compromise depending on how those fields are used internally. Transient fields in Java are normally excluded from serialization to protect derived or sensitive state; this flaw breaks that guarantee when processing externally supplied configuration data. No public exploit code or active exploitation has been confirmed at time of analysis, but given Jenkins' role as a CI/CD orchestrator with broad network access and secrets, the blast radius of exploitation is significant.
RemediationAI
The primary remediation is to upgrade Jenkins to version 2.580 (weekly channel) or 2.568.3 (LTS channel), both of which enforce exclusion of transient fields from deserialization. Administrators should prioritize this upgrade given that the attack vector is network-accessible and the required privilege level is low. If immediate patching is not feasible, limit configuration-submission permissions (Job/Configure, Overall/Administer) to the minimum required set of users - this raises the effective privilege bar for exploitation. Additionally, network-level controls restricting Jenkins UI and API access to trusted networks or VPN reduce exposure to external attackers, though they do not address insider or compromised-account scenarios. The advisory at https://www.jenkins.io/security/advisory/2026-09-02/#SECURITY-4032 should be consulted for any additional plugin-specific guidance, as Jenkins plugins may also expose configuration endpoints.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affects your stack
Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
Jenkins is a widely deployed Java-based CI/CD automation server governed by CPE cpe:2.3:a:jenkins_project:jenkins. In Java, fields marked transient are intentionally excluded from serialization - a common pattern for caching derived state, holding volatile references, or protecting sensitive runtime data from external persistence. CWE-502 (Deserialization of Untrusted Data) covers this class of flaw: when deserialization fails to exclude transient fields from attacker-supplied input, those fields can be populated with arbitrary values. In Jenkins, configuration updates submitted by users are processed via its XStream-based serialization framework; the flaw in CVE-2026-84650 is that transient field exclusion is not enforced during the deserialization of such updates, allowing an attacker to inject values into fields that the application was never designed to accept from external sources. Downstream impact is code-path dependent but historically deserialization bugs in Jenkins have enabled RCE.
Know when Jenkins gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Network-accessible, no complexity beyond valid credentials; PR:L required since configuration-submit permission is needed; full triad justified by deserialization RCE potential.
Primary rating from Vendor (jenkins).
CVSS VectorVendor: jenkins
Lifecycle Timeline
3DescriptionCVE.org
In Jenkins 2.579 and earlier, LTS 2.568.2 and earlier, transient fields cannot be excluded from deserialization, allowing attackers able to submit configuration updates to specify the values of transient fields that will be deserialized, the impact depending on how those fields are used.
Articles & Coverage 2
Executive ViewAI
Jenkins deployments using versions 2.579 and earlier are at risk of complete compromise through exploitation of an unsafe deserialization flaw by authenticated configuration administrators. Since no patch is available, all build pipelines, deployment artifacts, and centrally-stored credentials remain vulnerable to insider threats and compromised developer accounts with configuration access. This creates an unmitigated risk to the integrity of the entire software delivery pipeline.
No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations: restrict configuration-submission permissions to essential personnel only, implement strict audit logging and alerting on Jenkins configuration modifications, network-segment Jenkins to isolate it from sensitive production systems, rotate all secrets stored in or accessed by Jenkins on an accelerated schedule, and evaluate temporary restrictions on deserialization of user-controlled configuration data.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Insecure deserialization occurs when an application converts serialized data (a stream of bytes representing an object's state) back into a living object without proper validation.
Denial of service against HTTP/2 server implementations allows remote unauthenticated attackers to exhaust server resour
A sandbox bypass vulnerability exists in Jenkins Pipeline: Groovy Plugin 2.63 and earlier in pom.xml, src/main/java/org/
The Jenkins CLI subsystem in Jenkins before 1.638 and LTS before 1.625.2 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary co
The remoting module in Jenkins before 2.32 and LTS before 2.19.3 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a
Multiple unspecified API endpoints in Jenkins before 1.650 and LTS before 1.642.2 allow remote authenticated users to ex
The Fingerprints pages in Jenkins before 1.638 and LTS before 1.625.2 might allow remote attackers to obtain sensitive j
The remoting module in Jenkins before 1.650 and LTS before 1.642.2 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by
A sandbox bypass vulnerability exists in Jenkins Script Security Plugin 1.53 and earlier in src/main/java/org/jenkinsci/
A code execution vulnerability exists in the Stapler web framework used by Jenkins 2.153 and earlier, LTS 2.138.3 and ea
A sandbox bypass vulnerability exists in Jenkins Script Security Plugin 1.50 and earlier in src/main/java/org/jenkinsci/
A sandbox bypass vulnerability exists in Pipeline: Declarative Plugin 1.3.3 and earlier in. Rated high severity (CVSS 8.
A sandbox bypass vulnerability exists in Pipeline: Groovy Plugin 2.61 and earlier in src/main/java/org/jenkinsci/plugins
EUVD-2026-70116
GHSA-6q2p-xwgj-7xw4
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
VulDB
Exploit-DB