Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
ReconGain physical access to unattended IGEL device
-
DeliveryInsert USB media with empty unsigned igel.conf
-
ExploitReboot device to trigger GRUB boot stage
-
InstallGRUB fail-open presents interactive shell
-
C2Append root shell arguments to kernel command line
-
ExecuteBoot device kernel with modified parameters
-
ImpactObtain root shell with disk unlocked
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A10:2025 - Mishandling of Exceptional Conditions
ASVS 5.0
V16 - Security Logging and Error Handling Fail-secure design
|
| Exploitation Conditions | Physical presence at the target device is the hard prerequisite - remote or network-based exploitation is not possible. The attacker must be able to place a file named igel.conf (which may be entirely empty and unsigned) on any storage partition readable by GRUB at boot time, most easily achieved via a USB storage device. No credentials, no prior access, and no special software configuration on the target are required - the fail-open behavior is present in default configurations of all affected IGEL OS versions. Exploitation is bounded to IGEL OS 12 before 12.9.0/12.8.3 LTS and IGEL OS 11 before 11.11.150; patched versions are not affected. Physical security controls (locked enclosures, cable locks, BIOS USB lockdown) are the primary mitigating factors for unpatched devices; BIOS USB lockdown reduces the removable-media delivery path but is not a complete fix if internal storage is accessible. |
| Impact | The CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:P/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H) precisely captures the threat profile: physical presence is a hard prerequisite, but within that constraint, exploitation is trivially low complexity - no credentials, no toolchain, just an empty file on storage media and a reboot. For organizations running thin client fleets such as healthcare kiosks, point-of-sale terminals, or branch office endpoints, physical access to unattended devices is a realistic and recurring threat scenario, making AV:P considerably less reassuring than it would be for rack-mounted server infrastructure. No CISA KEV listing and no EPSS data were available in the provided input, so exploitation probability cannot be quantified; however, the DEF CON 34 presentation and the AmberWolf blog post mean the full technique is publicly documented, materially lowering the skill bar for potential attackers. The TPM PCR bypass is the most significant risk amplifier: organizations relying on attestation as their primary integrity monitoring control have no automated tripwire for this attack. CVSS correctly indicates no availability impact (VA:N), consistent with the description - the attacker gains privileged access but does not disrupt device operation. Vendor-released patches are confirmed available (ISN-2026-20), making remediation straightforward for organizations with centrally managed update infrastructure. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker with brief unsupervised physical access to an IGEL thin client - such as a healthcare workstation left unattended or a kiosk in a semi-public area - inserts a USB drive containing an empty file named igel.conf and reboots the device. GRUB encounters the unsigned file and, due to its fail-open verification logic, presents an interactive GRUB prompt rather than refusing to continue. The attacker appends kernel parameters such as init=/bin/sh or single to the boot command, gaining a root shell with full read-write access to the unlocked disk, while TPM PCR values remain unaltered and produce no attestation alert in downstream monitoring systems. The complete technique, including cross-vendor applicability across multiple thin client brands, was presented publicly at DEF CON 34. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Aug 28, 2026
Secure boot bypass in IGEL OS 12 (before 12.9.0/12.8.3 LTS) and IGEL OS 11 (before 11.11.150) allows physically present attackers to obtain a root shell by exploiting GRUB's fail-open signature verification behavior. Placing an empty, unsigned file named igel.conf on any GRUB-accessible partition causes the bootloader to drop into an interactive GRUB prompt instead of halting, from which the attacker boots the device's own kernel with attacker-controlled command-line arguments, unlocking the disk. The attack leaves TPM PCR values unaltered - defeating attestation-based detection - and was publicly detailed at DEF CON 34; no active exploitation confirmed in CISA KEV at time of analysis.
RemediationAI
The primary fix is upgrading to IGEL OS 12.9.0 or IGEL OS 12.8.3 LTS (or later) for OS 12 deployments, and IGEL OS 11.11.150 (or later) for OS 11 deployments, per vendor advisory ISN-2026-20 at https://kb.igel.com/en/security-safety/current/isn-2026-20-grub-shell-escape-in-igel-os. For environments unable to patch immediately, the most effective compensating controls target physical access: deploy locking enclosures or cable locks on thin client hardware, disable USB and external storage ports via BIOS/UEFI configuration, and enforce BIOS boot order with an administrator password to prevent booting from removable media. Note that BIOS-level USB lockdown reduces the delivery surface but does not address the underlying GRUB fail-open flaw if an attacker can reach internal storage. TPM attestation alone is explicitly not a compensating control for this vulnerability, as PCR values are not modified during the attack. Organizations should prioritize patching physically exposed or unmanaged endpoints - kiosks, lobby terminals, and shared workstations - before managed desktops.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 2 packages in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
IGEL OS is a Linux-based thin client operating system that uses GRUB as its bootloader and relies on secure boot combined with TPM-based measured boot for hardware attestation. The root cause maps to CWE-636 (Not Failing Securely): GRUB's signature verification logic exhibits fail-open behavior when it encounters a file named igel.conf that lacks a valid cryptographic signature - rather than halting, it presents an interactive GRUB rescue shell. This inverts the expected security contract, treating a verification failure as an invitation to proceed rather than a reason to stop. Affected products per CPE are cpe:2.3:a:igel:igel_os_12 (all versions before 12.9.0 and before 12.8.3 LTS) and cpe:2.3:a:igel:igel_os_11 (all versions before 11.11.150). A compounding architectural factor is that the attack path does not modify TPM PCR registers, meaning measured-boot attestation pipelines produce no anomaly signal, eliminating a commonly assumed detection layer.
Know when Igel Os 12 gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Physical access required (AV:P), no credentials needed (PR:N), scope change as GRUB compromise yields full OS-level root shell (S:C), with no availability impact.
Primary rating from Vendor (VulnCheck).
CVSS VectorVendor: VulnCheck
DescriptionCVE.org
IGEL OS 12 before 12.9.0, 12.8.3 LTS and IGEL OS 11 before 11.11.150 contain a secure boot bypass vulnerability in the GRUB boot stage that allows physically present attackers to gain unauthorized root access by placing an unsigned empty file named igel.conf on a partition. Attackers can exploit GRUB's fail-open signature verification behavior to drop into an interactive GRUB prompt, then boot the device's own kernel with additional command-line arguments to obtain a root shell with the disk unlocked while leaving TPM PCR values unaltered.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.
EUVD-2026-67962
GHSA-7c38-49cx-fjvw
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB