Skip to main content

PPWP Password Protect Pages EUVDEUVD-2026-57741

| CVE-2026-3639 MEDIUM
Cross-site Scripting (XSS) (CWE-79)
2026-08-13 Wordfence GHSA-jgr2-qxr7-gw6v
6.4
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: Wordfence
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain or register contributor WordPress account
  2. Delivery
    Insert malicious JavaScript into ppwp shortcode attribute
  3. Exploit
    Publish or save page with injected payload
  4. Execution
    Privileged user (admin) visits page
  5. Persist
    Stored XSS executes in victim browser
  6. Impact
    Exfiltrate session token or execute admin-level actions

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Output encoding, context-aware escaping
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires an authenticated WordPress user account with at minimum contributor-level role, which grants the ability to create or edit draft posts and use shortcodes. The ppwp shortcode must be available to contributors on the target installation - this is the default behavior when the plugin is active. The stored payload fires automatically for any user who visits the injected page, with administrators being the highest-value targets due to their elevated site permissions. Exploitation is bounded by the PR:L requirement: unauthenticated users and subscribers cannot trigger this vector. Sites with open user registration, weak password policies, or many active contributor accounts face materially elevated risk. A privileged victim (e.g., an administrator) visiting the crafted page is required for maximum impact; if only lower-privileged users visit, the XSS impact is correspondingly reduced.

Impact

The NVD CVSS 3.1 score of 6.4 (Medium) reflects a network-accessible (AV:N), low-complexity (AC:L) attack requiring low privileges (PR:L) with changed scope (S:C) and low confidentiality and integrity impact. The S:C designation correctly models XSS crossing from the WordPress application boundary into victim browser sessions. However, the provided vector specifies UI:N, which is atypical for stored XSS - victim page access is a prerequisite, suggesting UI:R is more accurate; this metric discrepancy should be verified with Wordfence or NVD. No EPSS data was supplied, and the vulnerability is absent from CISA KEV with no known public proof-of-concept, materially reducing urgency. Real-world risk is moderate: contributor accounts are the lowest named role in WordPress above subscriber, and on sites with open user registration or multiple authors this barrier is meaningful but not high. The highest-impact realistic outcome is administrator session compromise via a cookie-stealing payload, which could culminate in full WordPress site takeover - making this a genuine priority for multi-author or open-registration deployments despite the medium base score.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker registers or compromises a contributor-level WordPress account on a target site and creates a page embedding the ppwp shortcode with a JavaScript payload - such as a session-cookie exfiltration script - embedded in a shortcode attribute. When an administrator subsequently browses the page during routine site review, the stored script executes in their browser, silently forwarding the admin session token to an attacker-controlled endpoint. No public proof-of-concept has been identified, but the attack pattern is well-established for WordPress stored XSS and requires no novel technique.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
No patch listed yet 0.3% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Aug 13, 2026

Stored Cross-Site Scripting in the PPWP - Password Protect Pages WordPress plugin (all versions through 1.9.21) allows authenticated contributors to inject persistent malicious scripts via unsanitized ppwp shortcode attributes. Insufficient input sanitization and output escaping in the plugin's shortcode handler and view template enable payload persistence in the WordPress database, firing in the browsers of any subsequent visitor - including administrators - to affected pages. No active exploitation is confirmed and no public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis.

RemediationAI

Users should update the PPWP - Password Protect Pages plugin to any version released after 1.9.21; however, an exact confirmed patched release version is not independently verifiable from the available data. A changeset between versions 1.9.19 and 1.9.20 is referenced in the WordPress.org Trac repository (https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset?old_path=%2Fpassword-protect-page/tags/1.9.19&new_path=%2Fpassword-protect-page/tags/1.9.20) but does not confirm a complete fix for this specific CVE since 1.9.21 remains listed as affected. As a compensating control while awaiting a confirmed patch, administrators should audit and restrict contributor-level accounts - particularly on sites with open user registration - and manually inspect all pages using the ppwp shortcode for injected script content. Disabling ppwp shortcode processing is a more disruptive but effective mitigation, at the cost of losing password-protection functionality on those pages. Restricting the contributor role's ability to publish without review via an editorial workflow adds a meaningful barrier without breaking plugin functionality.

Affected VersionsENISA

PPWP – Password Protect Pages 0 ≤1.9.21

Affected Packages

euvd ppwp_password_protect_pages no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

CWE-79 (Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation - Stored XSS) describes the root cause: the plugin's ppwp WordPress shortcode accepts user-supplied attributes that are rendered into page output without adequate sanitization or escaping. The two confirmed vulnerable code paths, identified by Wordfence and traceable via the WordPress.org Trac repository, are includes/services/class-ppw-shortcode.php at line 582 (the shortcode attribute handler) and includes/views/shortcode/view-ppw-restriced-content-form.php at line 18 (the template rendering those values). CPE cpe:2.3:a:buildwps:ppwp_-_password_protect_pages identifies the vendor and plugin. Because the variant is Stored XSS, the injected payload persists in the WordPress database and is served to every subsequent page visitor without further attacker interaction.

Know when Wordpress Plugin gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (Wordfence) PRIMARY 6.4 MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
vuln.today AI 5.4 MEDIUM

UI:R applied over the provided UI:N because stored XSS still requires a victim to navigate to the injected page; all other metrics - PR:L for contributor access, S:C for browser scope change - are consistent with the description.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (Wordfence).

CVSS VectorVendor: Wordfence

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

DescriptionCVE.org

The PPWP - Password Protect Pages plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the plugin's ppwp shortcode attributes in all versions up to, and including, 1.9.21 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user supplied attributes. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.3%
Top 83% exploitable
Prevalence
Medium
popular WordPress plugin serving a specific page password-protection niche
Social Media
1
Sightings
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.3%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact· derived
Medium
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

32
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +32
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Cross-Site Scripting occurs when an application accepts untrusted data and sends it to a web browser without proper validation or encoding.

CVE-2023-6553 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Dec 15

The Backup Migration plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Remote Code Execution in all versions up to, and including, 1

CVE-2024-5084 CRITICAL POC
9.8 May 23

The Hash Form - Drag & Drop Form Builder plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary file uploads due to missing fil

CVE-2024-44000 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Oct 20

Authentication bypass in the LiteSpeed Cache WordPress plugin (versions prior to 6.5.0.1) allows unauthenticated remote

CVE-2020-36847 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jul 12

The Simple File List plugin for WordPress through version 4.2.2 contains an unauthenticated remote code execution vulner

CVE-2025-11749 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Nov 05

The AI Engine WordPress plugin through version 3.1.3 exposes Bearer Token values through the /mcp/v1/ REST API endpoint

CVE-2025-27007 CRITICAL POC
9.8 May 01

The SureTriggers WordPress plugin through version 1.0.82 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows unaut

CVE-2016-1209 CRITICAL POC
9.8 May 14

The Ninja Forms plugin before 2.9.42.1 for WordPress allows remote attackers to conduct PHP object injection attacks via

CVE-2024-4443 CRITICAL POC
9.8 May 22

The Business Directory Plugin - Easy Listing Directories for WordPress plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to time-based

CVE-2024-1698 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Feb 27

SQL injection in the NotificationX WordPress plugin (versions up to and including 2.8.2) allows unauthenticated remote a

CVE-2023-6875 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jan 11

The POST SMTP Mailer - Email log, Delivery Failure Notifications and Best Mail SMTP for WordPress plugin for WordPress i

CVE-2024-1512 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Feb 17

The MasterStudy LMS WordPress Plugin - for Online Courses and Education plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to union base

CVE-2024-4295 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jun 05

The Email Subscribers by Icegram Express plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to SQL Injection via the ‘hash’ parameter in

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy