Skip to main content

Red Hat Keycloak EUVDEUVD-2026-50214

| CVE-2026-18207 MEDIUM
Improper Authorization (CWE-285)
2026-07-29 redhat GHSA-rfxv-6gx8-3fm6
6.5
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: redhat
Share

Severity by source

Vendor (redhat) PRIMARY
6.5 MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
vuln.today AI
6.5 MEDIUM

PR:L confirmed because client management privileges are required; I:H because hardening policy bypass enables insecure client registration; no confidentiality or availability impact.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Red Hat
6.5 MEDIUM
qualitative

Primary rating from Vendor (redhat).

CVSS VectorVendor: redhat

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
High
Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Analysis Generated
Jul 29, 2026 - 10:00 vuln.today
CVE Published
Jul 29, 2026 - 08:34 cve.org
MEDIUM 6.5

DescriptionCVE.org

A flaw was found in the client policy enforcement mechanism of Keycloak. The issue occurs when the system checks group membership by name instead of a unique identifier. An attacker with client management privileges could bypass security policies by joining a group with a matching name in a different part of the group hierarchy, potentially allowing them to register or update clients without following required security hardening profiles.

AnalysisAI

Client policy enforcement in Keycloak is bypassable by any user holding client management privileges who exploits a group-name collision across the group hierarchy. Because the policy engine resolves group membership by display name rather than unique identifier, an attacker can create or join a group in a different part of the hierarchy that shares a name with a privileged policy group, then register or update OAuth/OIDC clients without satisfying the required security hardening profiles. No public exploit has been identified at time of analysis, and active exploitation has not been confirmed by CISA KEV.

Technical ContextAI

Keycloak implements client policies - sets of conditions and executor profiles that enforce security constraints (e.g., PKCE, FAPI compliance) on OAuth2/OIDC client registrations and updates. Conditions within those policies can be scoped to group membership. The flaw (CWE-285: Improper Authorization) arises because the group membership condition evaluates membership by group name string rather than the group's internal UUID. In a hierarchical group model, multiple groups at different levels of the tree can share the same leaf name, making name-based resolution ambiguous and exploitable. Affected CPEs include cpe:2.3:a:red_hat:red_hat_build_of_keycloak:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*, cpe:2.3:a:red_hat:red_hat_single_sign-on_7:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*, cpe:2.3:a:red_hat:red_hat_data_grid_8:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*, and cpe:2.3:a:red_hat:red_hat_jboss_enterprise_application_platform_expansion_pack:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*, indicating the vulnerability spans the full Red Hat IAM/middleware product family that bundles Keycloak.

RemediationAI

Apply the vendor-released patch from Red Hat once a specific fixed build is published and confirmed via https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-18207 - exact fix versions are not independently confirmed from available CPE data and should not be assumed. As a compensating control while awaiting the patch, administrators should audit all client policies that use group-membership conditions and verify that no two groups at different hierarchy levels share identical names; renaming ambiguous groups eliminates the name-collision prerequisite. Additionally, restrict client management privileges to the minimum necessary set of realm administrators, reducing the pool of accounts that could trigger this bypass. Be aware that renaming groups may require updating policy conditions and could affect dependent automation. Monitoring the Red Hat Security Advisory portal for updated erratum packages is advised.

CVE-2026-18963 CRITICAL POC
9.1 Aug 18

Account takeover in Red Hat Build of Keycloak allows an unauthenticated attacker to abuse the reset-credentials flow in

CVE-2026-16442 CRITICAL
9.8 Aug 05

Account takeover in Keycloak (Red Hat build of Keycloak, Red Hat Single Sign-On 7) arises because the IdP-initiated SAML

CVE-2026-16443 CRITICAL
9.1 Aug 05

Authentication bypass in Red Hat Build of Keycloak (and Red Hat Single Sign-On 7) lets an unauthenticated attacker forge

CVE-2026-15572 HIGH
8.8 Aug 05

Privilege escalation in Red Hat Build of Keycloak's Dynamic Client Registration (DCR) grants an attacker with low-privil

CVE-2026-93569 HIGH
8.2 Sep 18

Mismatched handling of the HTTP/1 absolute-form request authority in Red Hat build of Quarkus and other affected Red Hat

CVE-2026-9800 HIGH
8.1 Jun 25

Authorization bypass in the Keycloak Policy Enforcer allows any authenticated user to circumvent all enforced access con

CVE-2026-15573 HIGH
8.1 Aug 05

URI normalization bypass in Keycloak's Authorization Services PathMatcher allows authenticated low-privilege users to re

CVE-2026-16102 HIGH
8.1 Aug 05

Privilege escalation in Keycloak's Dynamic Client Registration (DCR) component allows attackers with standard user accou

CVE-2026-18214 HIGH
8.1 Jul 31

Token exchange in Keycloak bypasses Google Workspace domain allowlist restrictions, enabling any valid Google account ho

CVE-2026-11800 HIGH
8.1 Jun 25

Signature-verification bypass in Keycloak (and Red Hat's Keycloak-based products such as Red Hat Single Sign-On 7 and Re

CVE-2026-18215 HIGH
8.1 Jul 31

Tenant-restriction bypass in Keycloak's Microsoft identity provider integration allows attackers holding any valid Micro

CVE-2026-18967 HIGH
8.1 Aug 06

Session hijacking via SAML assertion replay in Keycloak's SAML broker component allows adjacent-network attackers to aut

Vendor StatusVendor

Share

EUVD-2026-50214 vulnerability details – vuln.today

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy