Skip to main content

Fluent Support EUVDEUVD-2026-48504

| CVE-2026-15665 MEDIUM
Cross-site Scripting (XSS) (CWE-79)
2026-07-24 Wordfence GHSA-64jj-pfw2-rm5w
6.4
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: Wordfence
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Recon
    Obtain contributor WordPress account
  2. Delivery
    Insert XSS payload via redirect-to shortcode attribute
  3. Exploit
    Payload persists in database
  4. Install
    Victim loads injected page in vulnerable browser
  5. C2
    Victim presses triggering access key
  6. Execute
    Script executes in victim browser session
  7. Impact
    Session token or credentials exfiltrated

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Output encoding, context-aware escaping
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires the attacker to hold at minimum a contributor-level WordPress account on the target site - unauthenticated or subscriber-level access is insufficient. The shortcode must be placed on a page accessible to potential victims. On the victim side, exploitation is further gated by two concurrent conditions: the victim must be using a browser that processes HTML access key attributes as script triggers (not all browsers do), and the victim must press the specific keyboard access key combination that fires the hidden attribute - this is not a routine browsing action. There is no default-configuration exploitation path; sites that disable open user registration or restrict shortcode use to editors and above are substantially protected. The CVSS PR:L confirms authentication is required from the attacker's side.

Impact

The NVD/Wordfence CVSS 3.1 score of 6.4 uses AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N. The UI:N rating is debatable given the description explicitly requires the victim to press specific access keys in specific browsers - this is user interaction by any reasonable definition. Likewise, AC:L understates the non-default browser and access-key preconditions described. A more conservative independent assessment raises AC to High and UI to Required, reflecting real-world exploitation difficulty. PR:L accurately reflects the contributor-level authentication barrier, which restricts the attacker pool on sites with controlled registration. No EPSS data was provided in the intelligence feed. There is no CISA KEV listing, no public POC, and no known active exploitation. The description's own language - 'making exploitation unlikely' - is an unusually candid concession of low real-world risk by the reporting researcher (Wordfence). Despite the scope-changed (S:C) rating suggesting cross-user impact potential, the realistic threat tier is low: an attacker must already have a contributor account, the payload only activates under narrow browser/access-key conditions, and no weaponized exploit is known.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who has registered or obtained a contributor-level WordPress account crafts a page or post embedding the Fluent Support shortcode with a malicious JavaScript payload in the 'redirect-to' attribute. The payload persists in the database and is rendered into a hidden HTML attribute on any page where the shortcode is placed. A victim browsing the page in a susceptible browser presses a platform-specific access key (e.g., Alt+letter on certain desktop browsers), inadvertently triggering the hidden attribute's script, which could exfiltrate session cookies or perform actions as the authenticated victim.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
No patch listed yet 0.2% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Jul 24, 2026

Stored Cross-Site Scripting in the Fluent Support WordPress plugin (all versions through 2.3.0) allows authenticated contributors to inject persistent JavaScript via the 'redirect-to' shortcode attribute due to missing input sanitization and output escaping in AuthHandler.php. The injected payload executes in the browser context of any user who subsequently visits the affected page, enabling session hijacking, credential theft, or administrative action forgery. Practical exploitation is significantly constrained: the payload resides in a hidden HTML attribute and only triggers in certain browsers when the victim activates specific keyboard access keys, making mass exploitation unlikely despite the network-accessible attack path. No public exploit code has been identified and this CVE is not listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

RemediationAI

Update the Fluent Support plugin to the version immediately following 2.3.0 once released via the WordPress plugin repository; the upstream fix is referenced in changeset 3609122 but an exact patched release version is not confirmed from available data - verify the current version in the WordPress admin plugin update interface. If an updated version is not yet available, site administrators should restrict contributor-level role assignment to trusted users only, as the vulnerability requires at minimum contributor access to exploit. Disabling shortcode processing for untrusted users via a capability filter (e.g., using the 'shortcode_atts' or role-gating filters) can serve as a compensating control, though this may affect legitimate plugin functionality. Given that exploitation requires specific browser access-key behavior, the residual risk for sites that cannot immediately patch is low; however, sites permitting open contributor registration face heightened exposure.

Affected VersionsENISA

Fluent Support – Helpdesk & Customer Support Ticket System 0 ≤2.3.0

Affected Packages

euvd fluent_support_helpdesk_customer_support_ticket_system no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The vulnerability is rooted in CWE-79 (Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation - Stored XSS). The affected code resides in the plugin's AuthHandler.php file at multiple handler methods (lines 111, 149, 201, and 500 in the 2.3.0 tag). The 'redirect-to' parameter passed via a WordPress shortcode attribute is neither sanitized on input nor escaped on output, allowing raw HTML/JavaScript to be persisted in the database and later reflected into rendered pages. The CPE string cpe:2.3:a:wpmanageninja:fluent_support is the affected product. The unusual delivery mechanism - a hidden HTML attribute that depends on browser-specific access key processing - limits the payload's fire conditions to non-default user behavior and browser environments, which is atypical for stored XSS and is explicitly noted in the description as a primary exploitation barrier.

Know when Wordpress Plugin gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (Wordfence) PRIMARY 6.4 MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
vuln.today AI 4.4 MEDIUM

AC:H reflects the specific-browser and access-key preconditions; UI:R captures the victim's required keyboard action to fire the hidden-attribute payload.

3.1 AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
4.0 AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:A/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (Wordfence).

CVSS VectorVendor: Wordfence

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

DescriptionCVE.org

The Fluent Support - Helpdesk & Customer Support Ticket System plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via 'redirect-to' Shortcode Attribute in all versions up to, and including, 2.3.0 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. The XSS payload is in a hidden attribute so it only fires in specific browsers when specific access keys are used making exploitation unlikely.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.2%
Top 90% exploitable
Prevalence
Medium
popular WordPress helpdesk plugin, moderate but non-universal deployment
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.2%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact· derived
Medium
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

32
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +32
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Cross-Site Scripting occurs when an application accepts untrusted data and sends it to a web browser without proper validation or encoding.

CVE-2023-6553 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Dec 15

The Backup Migration plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Remote Code Execution in all versions up to, and including, 1

CVE-2024-5084 CRITICAL POC
9.8 May 23

The Hash Form - Drag & Drop Form Builder plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary file uploads due to missing fil

CVE-2024-44000 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Oct 20

Authentication bypass in the LiteSpeed Cache WordPress plugin (versions prior to 6.5.0.1) allows unauthenticated remote

CVE-2020-36847 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jul 12

The Simple File List plugin for WordPress through version 4.2.2 contains an unauthenticated remote code execution vulner

CVE-2025-11749 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Nov 05

The AI Engine WordPress plugin through version 3.1.3 exposes Bearer Token values through the /mcp/v1/ REST API endpoint

CVE-2025-27007 CRITICAL POC
9.8 May 01

The SureTriggers WordPress plugin through version 1.0.82 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows unaut

CVE-2016-1209 CRITICAL POC
9.8 May 14

The Ninja Forms plugin before 2.9.42.1 for WordPress allows remote attackers to conduct PHP object injection attacks via

CVE-2024-4443 CRITICAL POC
9.8 May 22

The Business Directory Plugin - Easy Listing Directories for WordPress plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to time-based

CVE-2024-1698 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Feb 27

SQL injection in the NotificationX WordPress plugin (versions up to and including 2.8.2) allows unauthenticated remote a

CVE-2023-6875 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jan 11

The POST SMTP Mailer - Email log, Delivery Failure Notifications and Best Mail SMTP for WordPress plugin for WordPress i

CVE-2024-1512 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Feb 17

The MasterStudy LMS WordPress Plugin - for Online Courses and Education plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to union base

CVE-2024-4295 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jun 05

The Email Subscribers by Icegram Express plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to SQL Injection via the ‘hash’ parameter in

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy