Skip to main content

LiquidFiles EUVDEUVD-2026-38111

| CVE-2026-12673 MEDIUM
Improper Authorization (CWE-285)
2026-06-20 PRJBLK GHSA-pmp7-7j9c-794v
5.9
CVSS 4.0 · Vendor: PRJBLK
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain secondary domain Admin credentials
  2. Delivery
    Authenticate to LiquidFiles web interface
  3. Exploit
    Modify managed secondary domain group configuration
  4. Execution
    Trigger broken authorization check
  5. Persist
    Escalate session to Sysadmin role
  6. Impact
    Access all files, users, and system settings across all domains

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V8 - Authorization Authorization verification
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Defense Evasion

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires: (1) valid Admin-level credentials for a secondary (non-default) LiquidFiles domain - regular user accounts and primary domain accounts are not sufficient; (2) the target LiquidFiles instance must be configured with at least one secondary (non-default) domain, as the vulnerable code path is specific to non-default domain group management; (3) the attacker must be able to reach the LiquidFiles web interface over the network. Limiting factors include the requirement for pre-existing Admin credentials (PR:H), which restricts the attacker pool to insiders, compromised admin accounts, or threat actors who have already achieved a foothold with admin-level access. Default single-domain LiquidFiles deployments are not affected by this specific privilege escalation path.

Impact

The provided CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N) scores 5.9 Medium, reflecting that while network-accessible, exploitation requires high existing privileges (PR:H) and a specific deployment configuration (AT:P - secondary domain setup). The impact metrics in the provided vector (VC:L/VI:N/VA:H) appear conservative for a full Sysadmin escalation, and may not fully capture the confidentiality and integrity implications of gaining system-wide administrative access; this discrepancy is noted and my independent assessment differs (see assessed_cvss_vector). No KEV listing exists, meaning active exploitation is not confirmed by CISA. However, a public POC from Project Black is confirmed available, which meaningfully shortens the exploitation timeline for threat actors targeting LiquidFiles deployments. Real-world risk is highest in multi-tenant or enterprise environments where secondary domain Admin accounts are delegated to third parties or less-trusted users. Single-domain deployments are not exposed to this specific attack path.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker holding valid Admin credentials for a secondary domain - whether through credential theft, insider access, or social engineering - authenticates to the LiquidFiles web interface and uses the group management feature to modify their managed secondary domain group in a way that triggers the broken authorization check, elevating their session to Sysadmin. With Sysadmin access, the attacker gains unrestricted access to all files, users, and system configuration across every domain. A public proof-of-concept demonstrating this technique is available at https://projectblack.io/blog/liquidfiles-privilege-escalation/.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
Patch available 0.3% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Jun 22, 2026

Privilege escalation in LiquidFiles before 4.2.12 allows an authenticated Admin of a secondary (non-default) domain to elevate to full Sysadmin access by manipulating group settings within their managed secondary domain group. This broken access control flaw (CWE-285) collapses the authorization boundary between domain-scoped Admin and system-wide Sysadmin roles, granting an attacker complete platform control. No public exploitation has been confirmed in CISA KEV, but a public proof-of-concept is available from Project Black (PRJBLK), meaningfully elevating real-world risk above what the 5.9 CVSS score alone suggests.

RemediationAI

Upgrade to LiquidFiles 4.2.12 or later, which is the vendor-released patch confirmed by the release notes at https://docs.liquidfiles.com/release_notes/version_4-2-x.html. If immediate upgrade is not possible, audit all secondary domain Admin accounts and review recent group membership changes for signs of unauthorized privilege escalation. As a compensating control, restrict secondary domain Admin accounts to the minimum required set - removing the role from any untrusted or unnecessary accounts eliminates the attack surface entirely, though this limits legitimate delegation. Alternatively, temporarily consolidating all administration under the primary Sysadmin account (and disabling secondary domain admin delegation) removes the exploitable privilege boundary until patching is complete, at the cost of administrative convenience in multi-domain setups.

Affected VersionsENISA

LiquidFiles 0 <4.2.12

Affected Packages

euvd liquidfiles fix: 4.2.12

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

LiquidFiles is a secure file-sharing platform that supports multi-domain deployments, where secondary (non-default) domains can be administered by domain-scoped Admin accounts with privileges intentionally separated from the global Sysadmin role. The root cause is CWE-285 (Improper Authorization): the group management functionality in secondary domains fails to enforce the authorization boundary, allowing a secondary domain Admin to craft or modify group parameters that trigger a privilege elevation to Sysadmin. The affected product is identified by CPE cpe:2.3:a:liquidfiles:liquidfiles:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*, covering all versions below 4.2.12. The CVSS 4.0 attack requirement metric AT:P confirms a specific precondition - a multi-domain configuration - must be present for exploitation to be possible.

Know when Liquidfiles gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (PRJBLK) PRIMARY 5.9 MEDIUM
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
vuln.today AI 9.1 CRITICAL

PR:H for required secondary domain Admin credentials; S:C because escalation crosses from domain-scoped to system-wide authorization, with full C/I/A Sysadmin impact.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (PRJBLK).

CVSS VectorVendor: PRJBLK

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
Present
Privileges Required
High
User Interaction
None
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
Low
Vulnerable system: Integrity
None
Vulnerable system: Availability
High
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
None
Subsequent system: Integrity
None
Subsequent system: Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

1
Patch available
Jun 20, 2026 - 15:01 EUVD

DescriptionCVE.org

Liquidfiles versions before 4.2.12 are affected by a broken access control vulnerability resulting in privilege escalation from an Admin in a secondary domain to a Sysadmin by modifying a group in their managed secondary (non-default) group.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.3%
Top 83% exploitable
Exploit
POC
Public exploit code exists
Social Media
1
Sightings
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC Yes
EPSS 0.3%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation
Poc
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact· derived
Medium
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

50
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +30
PoC: +20
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.

Privilege escalation occurs when an attacker leverages flaws in access control mechanisms to gain permissions beyond what they were originally granted.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy