Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessAccess Discourse instance (authenticated or anonymous)
-
DeliveryDiscover or guess sequential webhook event IDs
-
ExploitSubscribe to /web_hook_events/<id> MessageBus channel
-
ExecutionReceive unrestricted webhook event payload
-
ImpactEnumerate additional IDs to harvest full webhook history
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V14 - Data Protection Data exposure prevention
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 2 tactics: Collection, Discovery The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | On Discourse instances where login_required is disabled (the default for many public communities): no authentication is required - anonymous users can subscribe to any /web_hook_events/<id> channel. On instances where login_required is enabled: any authenticated user account, regardless of role or group membership, can access all webhook event channels. The core enabling condition is the absence of group_ids enforcement in the MessageBus.publish call within Jobs::RedeliverWebHookEvents - this is a code-level omission present in all affected versions regardless of other configuration. Exploitation is further limited by requiring that webhook redelivery jobs have actually run (i.e., the feature must be in use), and the confidentiality impact depends entirely on what data the site's configured webhooks carry in their payloads. |
| Impact | The vendor-assigned CVSS score of 4.3 (Medium) uses AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N. The PR:N rating reflects that unauthenticated access is possible when login_required is disabled, while UI:R is inconsistent with the described attack - direct MessageBus channel subscription requires no victim interaction, suggesting the UI:R metric may underrepresent real-world exploitability on public instances. EPSS of 0.03% at the 9th percentile and the absence of a CISA KEV listing collectively indicate low probability of widespread automated exploitation currently. Real-world risk is moderate to sensitive Discourse deployments that use webhooks for internal integrations (CI/CD callbacks, CRM events, payment notifications) where payload content is confidential. Instances with login_required enabled narrow the attacker pool to authenticated members, substantially reducing exposure. This is not a high-urgency emergency patch but represents a meaningful access-control bypass warranting prompt remediation given the trivial enumeration path. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker - authenticated or anonymous depending on instance configuration - subscribes to the Discourse MessageBus channel /web_hook_events/1, /web_hook_events/2, and so on, iterating sequential integer IDs to retrieve webhook event payloads. Because webhook IDs are sequential integers with no per-channel authorization check, the attacker harvests event data (potentially including integration tokens, payload bodies, or system event details) across all redelivered webhook events without any elevated privileges. No exploit code has been publicly identified, but the attack requires no technical sophistication beyond basic HTTP knowledge. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Jun 12, 2026
Unauthorized access to webhook event data in Discourse exposes internal webhook payloads to any authenticated user - or unauthenticated users on instances with login_required disabled - across versions 2026.1.0 through several branch heads. The flaw resides in the MessageBus channel /web_hook_events/<id>, which the Jobs::RedeliverWebHookEvents job publishes to without enforcing group_id restrictions, allowing unrestricted channel subscription. Compounded by trivially enumerable sequential integer webhook IDs, any low-privilege or anonymous actor can iterate over webhook event history without authorization. No public exploit code exists and EPSS is 0.03% (9th percentile), indicating no observed widespread exploitation at time of analysis.
RemediationAI
Vendor-released patches are confirmed in versions 2026.1.4, 2026.3.1, 2026.4.1, and 2026.5.0-latest.1 - upgrade to the appropriate patched release for your branch. Full details are available in the vendor advisory at https://github.com/discourse/discourse/security/advisories/GHSA-wvrm-9v64-m96p. If immediate upgrade is not possible, enabling login_required (Site Settings → login_required) eliminates the anonymous-access vector, restricting the channel to authenticated users only - note this changes the site's public accessibility posture. As a deeper compensating control, restrict the network perimeter so that the Discourse MessageBus endpoint is not reachable by untrusted networks; however, this is impractical for publicly hosted communities. There is no known workaround that preserves webhook redelivery functionality while fully blocking the unauthorized channel subscription without patching.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 3 packages in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
Discourse uses MessageBus, an in-process pub/sub messaging layer, to push real-time updates to browser clients. When Jobs::RedeliverWebHookEvents publishes to the /web_hook_events/<id> channel, it omits the group_ids parameter that normally gates channel visibility to specific user groups. Without this restriction, MessageBus defaults to open broadcast. The affected CPE is cpe:2.3:a:discourse:discourse:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* across the identified version ranges. The root cause maps to CWE-200 (Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor) - a missing access-control enforcement at the messaging layer rather than at the HTTP routing layer. The sequential-integer nature of webhook IDs compounds the issue, reducing any practical obscurity and enabling IDOR-style enumeration without brute-force complexity.
Know when Discourse gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Network-accessible with no complexity, no privileges, and no user interaction needed; confidentiality impact is low and integrity/availability are unaffected.
Primary rating from Vendor (GitHub_M).
CVSS VectorVendor: GitHub_M
Lifecycle Timeline
1DescriptionCVE.org
Discourse is an open-source discussion platform. From versions 2026.1.0-latest to before 2026.1.4, 2026.3.0-latest to before 2026.3.1, and 2026.4.0-latest to before 2026.4.1, the MessageBus.publish call for /web_hook_events/<id> in Jobs::RedeliverWebHookEvents did not pass group_ids, leaving the channel readable by any authenticated user (or anonymous user on instances where login_required is disabled). Webhook IDs are sequential integers and trivially enumerable. This issue has been patched in versions 2026.1.4, 2026.3.1, 2026.4.1, and 2026.5.0-latest.1.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.
Discourse versions prior to 3.5.0.beta6 contain a reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in social login fun
discourse-bbcode is the official BBCode plugin for Discourse. Rated critical severity (CVSS 9.8), this vulnerability is
Unauthorized information disclosure in Discourse discussion platform versions prior to 2026.3.0-latest.1, 2026.2.1, and
Discourse is an open source platform for community discussion. Rated high severity (CVSS 8.2), this vulnerability is rem
Discourse versions prior to 2025.12.2, 2026.1.1, and 2026.2.0 contain an insecure direct object reference (IDOR) in the
In Discourse 2.7.0 through beta1, a rate-limit bypass leads to a bypass of the 2FA requirement for certain forms. Rated
Unauthenticated attackers can submit forged webhook payloads to multiple email provider integrations in Discourse versio
Discourse is an open-source discussion platform. Rated medium severity (CVSS 6.5), this vulnerability is remotely exploi
Discourse is an open source platform for community discussion. Rated medium severity (CVSS 5.9), this vulnerability is r
Discourse versions prior to 3.4.4 (stable), 3.5.0.beta5 (beta), and 3.5.0.beta6-dev (tests-passed) contain a critical vu
Discourse is an open source platform for community discussion. Rated critical severity (CVSS 9.8), this vulnerability is
Discourse Patreon enables syncronization between Discourse Groups and Patreon rewards. Rated critical severity (CVSS 9.8
EUVD-2026-36560
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
GitHub
Exploit-DB