Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessObtain low-privileged device credentials
-
DeliverySend crafted HTTP POST to /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi
-
ExploitInject shell metacharacters in FileName parameter
-
ExecutionsetUpgradeUboot passes unsanitized input to OS call
-
ImpactArbitrary commands execute on router firmware
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization OS command sanitization, avoid shell exec
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 1 tactic: Execution The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires the attacker to hold at minimum low-privileged credentials on the device's web management interface - confirmed by the CVSS 4.0 PR:L metric. The vulnerable endpoint is /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi and the specific function targeted is setUpgradeUboot, which handles firmware upgrade operations; this endpoint must be reachable over the network (AV:N confirmed). No special non-default configuration is required beyond the web interface being accessible, as the Setting Handler is a standard component of the firmware. Exploitation is limited by: the authentication requirement (PR:L), meaning unauthenticated attackers must first obtain credentials (default credentials on consumer routers are a well-known risk factor); the device must have its management interface network-accessible; and the specific firmware version 6.2c.510 must be running. No user interaction is required once the attacker is authenticated (UI:N). |
| Impact | The CVSS 4.0 base score of 2.1 is strikingly low for an OS command injection finding and warrants explicit scrutiny. The vector's impact subscores - VC:L/VI:L/VA:L for the vulnerable component and SC:N/SI:N/SA:N for subsequent systems - drive this score down despite the favorable attack vector (AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N). This low-impact scoring is incongruous with CWE-78 on an embedded Linux router, where OS command injection typically yields root-level command execution; the scoring may reflect a conservative NVD/VulDB assessment of the device's limited blast radius as a small consumer appliance rather than an enterprise asset, or may be under-assessed. Defenders should treat the CVSS score with skepticism and consider the actual technical impact independently. The EPSS score of 2.95% at the 87th percentile indicates this CVE is considered significantly more exploitable than ~87% of all CVEs tracked - this elevated ranking, combined with publicly available exploit code on GitHub (E:P in the CVSS vector), materially increases real-world exploitation risk. The absence from CISA KEV means confirmed active exploitation has not been observed by CISA at this time, but POC availability lowers the bar for opportunistic attackers. Authentication requirement (PR:L) provides some friction but is a weak barrier on consumer routers where default credentials are pervasive. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker who has obtained low-privileged credentials to the Totolink CA750-PoE web interface - whether through default credential guessing, credential reuse, or prior compromise - sends a crafted HTTP request to /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi targeting the setUpgradeUboot function with a malicious FileName value containing shell metacharacters (e.g., a semicolon followed by a command). The firmware processes this parameter without sanitization and passes it to an OS-level call, executing the injected command in the context of the CGI process. A public proof-of-concept hosted at https://github.com/wudipjq/my_vuln/blob/main/totolink4/vuln_54/54.md provides a ready-made exploitation template, significantly lowering attacker skill requirements. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Jun 08, 2026
OS command injection in Totolink CA750-PoE firmware 6.2c.510 allows a network-adjacent authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary operating system commands by manipulating the FileName argument passed to the setUpgradeUboot function within the /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi Setting Handler. Publicly available exploit code exists, hosted on GitHub, making exploitation accessible to low-skilled attackers. No public exploit identified in CISA KEV at time of analysis, though the EPSS 87th percentile ranking signals elevated exploitation interest relative to the broader CVE population despite a low absolute probability of 2.95%.
RemediationAI
No vendor-released patch has been identified at time of analysis - no Totolink security bulletin or fixed firmware version appears in the available references. Owners of Totolink CA750-PoE devices running firmware 6.2c.510 should check https://www.totolink.net/ for firmware updates and apply any available release immediately. As a compensating control, restrict access to the device's web management interface (/cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi) to trusted management VLANs or hosts only by applying firewall ACLs at the network perimeter - this reduces exposure to the network-accessible attack vector (AV:N) without disabling the device. Disabling remote management access entirely if not operationally required eliminates the primary attack surface; note this prevents remote administration. Changing default credentials to strong, unique passwords increases the cost of PR:L exploitation since attackers must first obtain valid credentials. Network segmentation to isolate PoE infrastructure from user-accessible subnets reduces lateral movement risk if the device is compromised. These mitigations do not eliminate the vulnerability and should be treated as temporary measures pending a vendor patch.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The CA750-PoE is a PoE-capable wireless router running embedded Linux firmware version 6.2c.510, identified via CPE cpe:2.3:a:totolink:ca750-poe:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*. The vulnerability resides in the CGI-based web management interface (/cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi), specifically in the setUpgradeUboot function responsible for handling firmware upgrade operations. CWE-78 (Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command) indicates that the FileName parameter accepted by this handler is passed unsanitized - or insufficiently sanitized - to an underlying shell execution call, allowing an attacker to inject metacharacters or shell operators that the firmware's OS interprets as commands. This class of vulnerability is common in low-cost embedded router firmware where CGI handlers call system() or popen() with user-supplied strings without adequate validation. The CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N) confirms the attack is fully network-reachable with low complexity and no required user interaction, contingent on holding low-privileged credentials.
Know when Ca750 Poe gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P
Primary rating from Vendor (VulDB) · only source for this CVE.
CVSS VectorVendor: VulDB
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionCVE.org
A weakness has been identified in Totolink CA750-PoE 6.2c.510. Impacted is the function setUpgradeUboot of the file /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi of the component Setting Handler. This manipulation of the argument FileName causes os command injection. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
OS command injection occurs when an application passes unsanitized user input directly into system shell commands.
OS command injection in Totolink CA750-PoE 6.2c.510 allows a low-privileged remote attacker to execute arbitrary operati
OS command injection in Totolink CA750-PoE firmware 6.2c.510 enables remote attackers with low-level credentials to exec
OS command injection in Totolink CA750-PoE firmware 6.2c.510 allows authenticated remote attackers to execute arbitrary
OS command injection in Totolink CA750-PoE firmware 6.2c.510 allows a remote, low-privileged attacker to execute arbitra
OS command injection in Totolink CA750-PoE firmware 6.2c.510 allows authenticated remote attackers to execute arbitrary
OS command injection in Totolink CA750-PoE firmware 6.2c.510 allows a low-privileged remote attacker to execute arbitrar
OS command injection in Totolink CA750-PoE firmware 6.2c.510 allows a network-reachable, low-privilege authenticated att
OS command injection in Totolink CA750-PoE firmware 6.2c.510 allows authenticated remote attackers to execute arbitrary
EUVD-2026-31789
GHSA-x42p-x8wg-p438
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
VulDB
Exploit-DB