Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessReverse-engineer firmware to extract hard-coded key
-
DeliveryCraft malicious firmware image and sign it
-
ExploitDeliver phishing email impersonating Silex support
-
ExecutionSocial engineer admin to click update link
-
PersistAdministrator applies fake firmware via AMC Manager
-
ImpactMalicious code executes on SD-330AC hardware
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A04:2025 - Cryptographic Failures
ASVS 5.0
V11 - Cryptography Key management, no hard-coded keys
|
| Exploitation Conditions | Hard-coded cryptographic key must be obtained or derived by the attacker - this typically requires firmware reverse-engineering, leaked documentation, or public disclosure of the key material. Administrative user must be persuaded to initiate a firmware update via email phishing, watering hole, or other social engineering - legitimate updates do not typically come unsolicited. Firmware update mechanism must accept the attacker's signed binary without additional out-of-band verification (challenge-response, manual checksum validation, or secure boot bypass). The vulnerability does NOT require authentication credentials to craft a malicious firmware image, only social engineering to trigger installation. Exploitation is limited by the UI:R requirement in CVSS - the attack cannot occur silently or automatically; an administrator must actively select and apply the firmware. |
| Impact | CVSS and real-world signals present a moderate-to-significant risk profile with important nuance. CVSS 6.5 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U) correctly identifies network vector and low complexity, but the UI:R requirement (user interaction) is the critical limiting factor - this is not spray-and-pray exploitation but rather a targeted social engineering attack against specific administrators. EPSS score not provided, preventing probabilistic exploitation assessment. No CISA KEV listing or active exploitation confirmation found in input data, though the vulnerability was reported by JPCERT (Japanese CERT), suggesting regional awareness. The attack requires both technical capability (obtaining or deriving the hard-coded key) and social engineering ability (convincing admin to apply fake firmware). For defenders: if SD-330AC or AMC Manager deployments are not internet-facing and updates occur in controlled environments, the practical risk is lower. However, if these devices manage critical network functions or if administrative traffic is exposed, the integrity impact (arbitrary firmware execution) elevates risk significantly. The hard-coded key nature means there is no per-device key rotation - once one instance is compromised, all instances using that key are potentially vulnerable. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker reverse-engineers the SD-330AC firmware or obtains the hard-coded cryptographic key through public research or supply-chain exposure, then crafts a malicious firmware image signed with the legitimate key. The attacker sends a phishing email to a network administrator managing SD-330AC devices, impersonating Silex support with a fake 'critical security update' link or attachment. When the administrator applies this firmware through AMC Manager's update interface, the signature validation passes because the malicious image was signed with the legitimate hard-coded key, resulting in arbitrary code execution within the SD-330AC with full device privileges. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Apr 20, 2026
Hard-coded cryptographic keys in Silex Technology SD-330AC and AMC Manager enable attackers to forge firmware updates that administrative users may be tricked into applying via social engineering, allowing arbitrary firmware installation without detection. The vulnerability affects all versions of both products and exploits a fundamental key management flaw (CWE-321). While the CVSS score of 6.5 reflects network accessibility and high integrity impact, real-world exploitation requires user interaction (UI:R) to convince an administrator to install malicious firmware.
RemediationAI
Silex Technology has not provided explicit patch version information in available references - verify directly with vendor at https://www.silex.jp/support/security-advisories/en/2026-001 for the specific patched version and availability timeline. Immediate compensating controls: (1) Restrict firmware update access to authenticated, encrypted management channels only - disable public HTTP/HTTPS firmware endpoints if exposed, enforce TLS 1.2+ and certificate pinning where supported to prevent man-in-the-middle firmware injection. (2) Implement out-of-band firmware verification: require administrative staff to manually verify firmware checksums or digital signatures against a separately maintained, trusted source before applying updates. (3) Deploy network segmentation to isolate SD-330AC and AMC Manager administrative access to a restricted management VLAN, preventing direct internet exposure. (4) Maintain detailed logs of all firmware update attempts and validate them against authorized change control procedures. (5) Educate administrative users on social engineering risks specific to firmware updates - legitimate Silex updates should only come through official channels with pre-announced scheduling. These controls mitigate the UI:R requirement by reducing the attack surface and detection time, but do not resolve the underlying hard-coded key issue. Patch deployment is essential once released.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affects your stack
Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The SD-330AC and AMC Manager products employ cryptographic key material to sign and validate firmware updates - a standard security mechanism for embedded systems and administrative tools. By hard-coding the same cryptographic key across all product instances (CWE-321: Use of Hard-coded Cryptographic Key), attackers who reverse-engineer the binary or obtain the key through other means can generate valid-appearing firmware signatures. This breaks the trust chain for firmware integrity verification. The vulnerability is classified as information disclosure in the tags but impacts integrity of firmware updates, suggesting that exposure of the hard-coded key itself (information disclosure) enables integrity compromise of the update mechanism. AMC Manager is a management platform for Silex network products, making compromised firmware updates particularly dangerous in enterprise environments.
Know when Amc Manager gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Primary rating from NVD · only source for this CVE.
CVSS VectorNVD
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionCVE.org
SD-330AC and AMC Manager provided by silex technology, Inc. use a hard-coded cryptographic key. An administrative user may be directed to apply a fake firmware update.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.
EUVD-2026-23751
GHSA-w7w2-59m3-j62x
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB