Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessAuthenticate to BSV Wallet API
-
ExploitSubmit certificate with forged signature via direct protocol
-
ExecutionWrite unverified certificate to storage
-
ImpactUse fraudulent certificate for blockchain transactions
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A04:2025 - Cryptographic Failures
ASVS 5.0
V11 - Cryptography Signature verification
|
| Exploitation Conditions | Authenticated user with network access to BSV Ruby SDK versions 0.3.1 to 0.8.1. Attacker must invoke BSV::Wallet::WalletClient#acquire_certificate method with either acquisition_protocol 'direct' (supplying forged certificate fields) or 'issuance' (controlling certifier URL or intercepting response). |
| Impact | Authenticated attackers can forge identity certificates in BSV Ruby SDK by bypassing signature verification in both direct and issuance protocols. CVSS 8.1 reflects high confidentiality and integrity impact. Real blast radius depends on SDK deployment scope; blockchain wallet applications using this SDK face authentication bypass and identity spoofing risks. Elevated observed exploitation activity signals active abuse. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | Authenticated attacker either (1) directly supplies forged certificate with fake signature via acquire_certificate API, or (2) controls certifier endpoint and responds with unsigned/invalid signature. Both paths write unverified records to storage, enabling subsequent authentication bypass via prove_certificate. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAI
Signature verification bypass in BSV Ruby SDK versions 0.3.1 through 0.8.1 allows authenticated attackers to forge blockchain identity certificates. The WalletClient#acquire_certificate method persists certificates without validating certifier signatures in both 'direct' acquisition (where attackers supply all fields including forged signatures) and 'issuance' protocols (where malicious certifier endpoints inject invalid signatures). Forged certificates appear authentic to list_certificates and prove_certificate operations, enabling impersonation attacks. CVSS 8.1 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N) reflects network-accessible exploitation requiring low-privilege authentication. No public exploit identified at time of analysis.
RemediationAI
Vendor-released patch: upgrade to BSV Ruby SDK version 0.8.2 or later, which implements cryptographic signature verification before certificate persistence. The fix is delivered via commit 4992e8a265fd914a7eeb0405c69d1ff0122a84cc merged in PR #306. Organizations unable to upgrade immediately should disable certificate acquisition APIs or implement external signature validation layers. Audit existing certificate stores for potentially forged records created between initial deployment and patch application. Official advisory and technical details: https://github.com/sgbett/bsv-ruby-sdk/security/advisories/GHSA-hc36-c89j-5f4j. Implementation reference: https://github.com/sgbett/bsv-ruby-sdk/pull/306. BSV certificate specification context: https://brc.dev/52.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 3 packages in rubygems, euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
Root cause is improper certificate validation (CWE-347) in certificate acquisition logic. Direct protocol accepts caller-supplied signature fields without cryptographic verification; issuance protocol trusts remote certifier responses blindly. Missing signature validation occurs before storage persistence, allowing forged certificates to contaminate wallet state and subsequently pass authenticity checks in certificate listing/proving operations.
Know when Bsv Ruby Sdk gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Primary rating from Vendor (GitHub_M) · only source for this CVE.
CVSS VectorVendor: GitHub_M
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionCVE.org
BSV Ruby SDK is the Ruby SDK for the BSV blockchain. From 0.3.1 to before 0.8.2, BSV::Wallet::WalletClient#acquire_certificate persists certificate records to storage without verifying the certifier's signature over the certificate contents. In acquisition_protocol: 'direct', the caller supplies all certificate fields (including signature:) and the record is written to storage verbatim. In acquisition_protocol: 'issuance', the client POSTs to a certifier URL and writes whatever signature the response body contains, also without verification. An attacker who can reach either API (or who controls a certifier endpoint targeted by the issuance path) can forge identity certificates that subsequently appear authentic to list_certificates and prove_certificate.
Executive ViewAI
BSV Ruby SDK versions 0.3.1-0.8.1 contain a signature verification bypass that allows authenticated users to forge blockchain identity certificates, enabling account impersonation and fraudulent identity claims. Organizations using this SDK for certificate-based authentication face direct risk to identity integrity and access control, particularly if the SDK is deployed in production systems handling financial transactions or sensitive access decisions.
No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations: (1) Restrict network access to certificate acquisition endpoints to trusted internal systems only; (2) Implement independent ECDSA signature verification of all certificates before accepting them for identity decisions, outside the SDK; (3) Deploy certificate pinning and require manual approval workflows for any new certificate acquisition; (4) Audit all certificates issued in the past 90 days for signs of forgery, particularly those with unusual issuers or timestamps.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.
EUVD-2026-20996
GHSA-hc36-c89j-5f4j
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB