Skip to main content

Openclaw EUVDEUVD-2026-16997

| CVE-2026-32915 CRITICAL
Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863)
2026-03-29 VulnCheck
9.3
CVSS 4.0 · NVD
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Low-privilege sandboxed leaf worker gains local access
  2. Delivery
    Craft subagent control request bypassing authorization checks
  3. Exploit
    Resolve request against parent requester scope
  4. Execution
    Access sibling run controls
  5. Impact
    Execute code with elevated tool policies

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V8 - Authorization Authorization logic validation
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Privilege Escalation

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Requires OpenClaw before version 2026.3.11 with leaf subagent architecture deployed. Attacker must be a low-privilege sandboxed leaf worker with local process access. Exploits insufficient authorization checks on subagent control requests to access parent requester scope and sibling run controls.

Impact

The CVSS 4.0 score of 9.3 reflects critical impact across confidentiality, integrity, and availability in both vulnerable and subsequent systems (VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H), though the local attack vector (AV:L) and low-privilege requirement (PR:L) constrain initial access scenarios. Real-world risk is elevated in environments where OpenClaw processes untrusted code or operates as a multi-tenant orchestration platform-common in AI agent frameworks and workflow automation systems. The low attack complexity (AC:L) and no user interaction requirement (UI:N) make exploitation straightforward once local access is obtained. Without EPSS data or KEV listing, prioritization depends on deployment context: organizations running OpenClaw in shared environments or processing untrusted workflows should treat this as urgent due to the privilege escalation and denial-of-service potential. The authentication bypass tag indicates this undermines fundamental security boundaries. SSVC assessment suggests immediate patching for systems where OpenClaw mediates security-sensitive operations, as the technical impact enables both data exfiltration (broader tool policies) and operational disruption (killing sibling runs).

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker with low-privilege local access deploys a malicious leaf subagent within an OpenClaw workflow orchestration system. The compromised worker issues crafted control requests to the subagent API, bypassing sandbox boundaries to terminate competing sibling processes handling sensitive data transformations. By resolving against the parent requester's scope, the attacker's subagent gains access to elevated tool policies, enabling file system access or network operations denied to sandboxed workers. This results in data exfiltration or denial of service as legitimate workflow tasks are systematically killed. The low complexity and lack of user interaction requirements allow rapid exploitation once initial code execution is achieved in any leaf context.

Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Why: CRITICAL severity.
Patch available 0.0% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Mar 29, 2026

Sandbox escape in OpenClaw versions before 2026.3.11 enables low-privilege leaf subagents to bypass isolation boundaries and manipulate sibling processes with elevated tool policies. Local authenticated attackers can terminate competing worker threads, redirect execution flows, and execute operations outside their intended security context by exploiting insufficient authorization on subagent control APIs. EPSS data not available for this recent CVE; no public exploit identified at time of analysis, though the technical advisory provides detailed vulnerability mechanics.

RemediationAI

Upgrade immediately to OpenClaw version 2026.3.11 or later, which implements proper authorization checks on subagent control surface requests. The patch enforces scope validation to ensure leaf workers cannot issue control commands outside their delegated session trees. Organizations should verify that subagent control requests are authenticated against the originating context rather than parent scope after upgrade. Detailed remediation guidance is available in the vendor's security advisory at https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/security/advisories/GHSA-4w7m-58cg-cmff and comprehensive analysis at https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/openclaw-sandbox-boundary-bypass-via-subagent-control-surface. No workarounds are documented; patching is the only effective mitigation. Post-upgrade, audit existing subagent configurations to ensure least-privilege tool policies are correctly enforced at each hierarchy level.

Affected VersionsENISA

OpenClaw 0 <2026.3.11

Affected Packages

npm openclaw fix: 2026.3.11

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in npm

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

OpenClaw implements a hierarchical subagent architecture where leaf workers operate in sandboxed execution contexts with restricted tool policies and isolated session trees. The vulnerability exists in the subagent control surface authorization layer, which fails to validate that control requests originate from appropriately scoped parent contexts. CWE-863 (Incorrect Authorization) manifests here as missing access control checks on inter-agent communication primitives. When a leaf subagent issues control commands (terminate, redirect, policy override), the system resolves these against the parent requester's scope rather than enforcing the leaf's own session boundary. This architectural flaw violates the principle of least privilege in multi-tenant agent orchestration systems, where each subagent should only control resources within its delegated security domain. The affected component is the request routing and authorization middleware that handles cross-agent RPC calls in the OpenClaw runtime.

Know when Openclaw gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

NVD PRIMARY 9.3 CRITICAL
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H

Primary rating from NVD · only source for this CVE.

CVSS VectorNVD

Attack Vector
Local
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
None
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
High
Vulnerable system: Integrity
High
Vulnerable system: Availability
High
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
High
Subsequent system: Integrity
High
Subsequent system: Availability
High

Lifecycle Timeline

3
Analysis Updated
Apr 16, 2026 - 05:47 EUVD-patch-fix
executive summary
Patch available
Apr 16, 2026 - 05:29 EUVD
2026.3.11
CVE Published
Mar 29, 2026 - 12:44 nvd
CRITICAL 9.3

DescriptionCVE.org

OpenClaw before 2026.3.11 contains a sandbox boundary bypass vulnerability allowing leaf subagents to access the subagents control surface and resolve against parent requester scope instead of their own session tree. A low-privilege sandboxed leaf worker can steer or kill sibling runs and cause execution with broader tool policies by exploiting insufficient authorization checks on subagent control requests.

Blast Radius

ecosystem impact
† from your stack dependencies † transitive graph · vuln.today resolves 4-path depth
  • 3 npm packages depend on openclaw (3 direct, 0 indirect)

Ecosystem-wide dependent count for version 2026.3.11.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

OpenClaw versions before 2026.3.11 contain a sandbox escape vulnerability allowing authenticated local users to bypass process isolation and manipulate sibling processes with elevated privileges, potentially compromising the integrity of multi-agent deployments. Organizations running OpenClaw in environments where local users have access must prioritize patching to prevent lateral privilege escalation and unauthorized process manipulation within agent infrastructure.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch. Pending patching: restrict local system access to trusted administrators only; disable or isolate subagent control APIs where operationally feasible; implement process-level monitoring to detect anomalous subagent interactions and thread termination events.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.0%
Top 99% exploitable
Data Quality
6 sources
Confidence: High
EUVD NVD CVE.org EPSS Vulnrichment GitHub VulDB

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity CRITICAL
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.0%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
CRITICAL severity
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Small
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

46
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +46
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.

CVE-2026-28446 CRITICAL POC
9.4 Mar 05

Auth bypass in OpenClaw voice-call extension before 2026.2.1. EPSS 0.68%. PoC and patch available.

CVE-2026-33579 CRITICAL POC
9.4 Mar 31

Privilege escalation in OpenClaw (pre-2026.3.28) allows unauthenticated remote attackers to gain administrative access b

CVE-2026-32042 HIGH POC
8.8 Mar 21

OpenClaw versions 2026.2.22 through 2026.2.24 contain a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows authenticated att

CVE-2026-32051 HIGH POC
8.8 Mar 21

An authorization mismatch vulnerability in OpenClaw versions prior to 2026.3.1 allows authenticated users with operator.

CVE-2026-25253 HIGH POC
8.8 Feb 01

OpenClaw versions prior to 2026.1.29 automatically establish WebSocket connections to attacker-controlled gateway URLs e

CVE-2026-32846 HIGH POC
8.7 Mar 26

Path traversal in OpenClaw through version 2026.3.23 enables unauthenticated remote attackers to read arbitrary files in

CVE-2026-53857 HIGH POC
8.6 Jun 16

Authentication bypass in OpenClaw before 2026.5.3 allows remote attackers with low privileges to receive agent responses

CVE-2026-100530 HIGH POC
8.5 Sep 26

Directory-context bypass in OpenClaw before 2026.8.1 allows authenticated attackers with user interaction to reuse an 'a

CVE-2026-32064 HIGH POC
8.5 Mar 21

Unauthenticated access to the noVNC observer interface in OpenClaw's Docker sandbox browser allows anyone who can reach

CVE-2026-32055 HIGH POC
7.6 Mar 21

OpenClaw versions before 2026.2.26 allow authenticated attackers to write arbitrary files outside the workspace director

CVE-2026-32056 HIGH POC
7.5 Mar 21

OpenClaw versions prior to 2026.2.22 contain a shell environment variable injection vulnerability in the system.run func

CVE-2026-32049 HIGH POC
7.5 Mar 21

OpenClaw versions prior to 2026.2.22 contain a resource exhaustion vulnerability where the application fails to consiste

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy