Skip to main content

Bwl Advanced Faq Manager Lite EUVDEUVD-2026-16083

| CVE-2026-4075 MEDIUM
Cross-site Scripting (XSS) (CWE-79)
2026-03-26 Wordfence GHSA-2vv2-mqg3-3j3p
6.4
CVSS 3.1 · NVD
View

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Output encoding, context-aware escaping
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Impact

The CVSS 3.1 vector (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N) indicates moderate severity with network accessibility, low attack complexity, and low privilege requirements (Contributor level), but the lack of EPSS score, KEV designation, and public proof-of-concept limits quantifiable exploitation probability assessment. The stored XSS nature is more severe than reflected XSS as it affects all page visitors repeatedly; however, the requirement for authenticated Contributor-level access constrains the attacker pool to registered WordPress users with publishing capabilities. This represents a realistic but not critical threat for WordPress sites with permissive user roles or where Contributor accounts are widely distributed. The true risk depends heavily on site-specific access controls and whether plugins are actively maintained-Wordfence's tracking suggests this remains an unpatched issue in live deployments.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker with WordPress Contributor access (either via a compromised account or intentional internal malicious actor) creates or edits a page containing the vulnerable shortcode with a crafted payload such as [baf_sbox sbox_id='test" onmouseover="alert(1)'], which breaks out of the HTML attribute context and injects an event handler. When any site visitor views the page, the malicious script executes in their browser session, potentially harvesting authentication cookies, redirecting to a phishing site, or modifying page content. The attack persists until the page is manually cleaned or the plugin is patched, affecting all subsequent visitors without requiring further attacker involvement.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
No patch listed yet 0.0% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Mar 26, 2026

The BWL Advanced FAQ Manager Lite WordPress plugin contains a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the 'baf_sbox' shortcode due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping of user-supplied attributes. Authenticated attackers with Contributor-level access or higher can inject arbitrary JavaScript code through shortcode attributes (sbox_id, sbox_class, placeholder, highlight_color, highlight_bg, cont_ext_class) that will execute in the browsers of all users viewing the affected pages. The vulnerability affects all versions up to and including 1.1.1, and while no public exploit code or KEV designation is currently documented, the CVSS 6.4 score and straightforward nature of the flaw indicate moderate real-world risk.

RemediationAI

Immediately upgrade the BWL Advanced FAQ Manager Lite plugin to the latest available version if a patch has been released beyond 1.1.1; check the official WordPress plugin repository and Wordfence advisories for patch status. Until patching is available, remove or deactivate the plugin if it is not critical to site functionality. For sites that must continue using the plugin, restrict Contributor-level access to trusted users only, implement WordPress user role management to limit who can create or edit posts with shortcodes, and consider using a Web Application Firewall (WAF) to detect and block inline script injections in page content. Additionally, conduct a security audit of any posts or pages using the 'baf_sbox' shortcode to identify and remediate any previously injected malicious code.

Affected VersionsENISA

BWL Advanced FAQ Manager Lite * ≤1.1.1

Affected Packages

euvd bwl_advanced_faq_manager_lite no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The vulnerability exists in the baf_sbox() function within the WordPress plugin framework (identified via CPE as cpe:2.3:a:xenioushk:bwl_advanced_faq_manager_lite), where shortcode attributes are directly interpolated into HTML element attributes without proper escaping using WordPress's esc_attr() function. This is classified as CWE-79 (Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation), a fundamental output encoding failure. The plugin processes user-controlled shortcode parameters and renders them directly in page HTML, allowing attackers to break out of HTML attribute context and inject malicious script tags or event handlers. The references to trunk and version 1.1.1 code at plugins.trac.wordpress.org demonstrate the persistence of this flaw across multiple plugin versions.

Know when Bwl Advanced Faq Manager Lite gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

NVD PRIMARY 6.4 MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Primary rating from NVD · only source for this CVE.

CVSS VectorNVD

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

DescriptionCVE.org

The BWL Advanced FAQ Manager Lite plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the 'baf_sbox' shortcode in all versions up to and including 1.1.1. This is due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user-supplied shortcode attributes such as 'sbox_id', 'sbox_class', 'placeholder', 'highlight_color', 'highlight_bg', and 'cont_ext_class'. These attributes are directly interpolated into HTML element attributes without any esc_attr() escaping in the baf_sbox() function. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

Organizations using all should be aware of moderate risk from CVE-2026-4075, a cross-site scripting vulnerability rated CVSS 6.4. Attackers could inject scripts to steal sessions or perform actions as authenticated users. Organizations should apply vendor updates when available and monitor for exploitation.

Business Impact: Low
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch. If patching is delayed: implement CSP headers, enable HttpOnly cookies, deploy WAF XSS rules.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.0%
Top 87% exploitable
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.0%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Defer
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact
Low
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

32
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +32
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Cross-Site Scripting occurs when an application accepts untrusted data and sends it to a web browser without proper validation or encoding.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy