Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessObtain revoked certificate with partitioned CRL
-
DeliverySubmit certificate for validation
-
ExploitCRL distribution point logic fails to validate partitioned CRL
-
ExecutionRevoked certificate accepted as valid
-
ImpactBypass certificate revocation checks
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A07:2025 - Authentication Failures
ASVS 5.0
V12 - Secure Communication Certificate revocation checking
|
| Exploitation Conditions | Requires AWS-LC versions before 1.71.0 or AWS-LC-FIPS before 3.3.0 with partitioned CRLs configured for certificate revocation checking. Remote attacker must present a revoked certificate during TLS/SSL handshake. No user interaction needed; AC:H suggests specific CRL configuration required. |
| Impact | The CVSS 3.1 score of 7.4 (High) reflects significant risk with network-based attack vector (AV:N), high attack complexity (AC:H), no privileges required (PR:N), and high impact to both confidentiality and integrity (C:H/I:H). The high attack complexity suggests exploitation requires specific conditions or timing, which moderates the risk somewhat. Without EPSS data or KEV listing, there's no evidence of active exploitation in the wild. The authentication bypass tag and the nature of certificate validation failures suggest this could enable man-in-the-middle attacks or unauthorized access to TLS-protected services. However, successful exploitation requires an attacker to already possess a revoked certificate and the target system to use partitioned CRLs, limiting the attack surface. This is a priority for organizations using AWS-LC in production, particularly those with strict certificate validation requirements, but the high complexity and specific preconditions make it less critical than initially suggested by the CVSS score alone. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker with a legitimately issued but subsequently revoked certificate could exploit this vulnerability to bypass certificate revocation checks in systems using vulnerable AWS-LC versions with partitioned CRL validation enabled. The attacker would present their revoked certificate during TLS handshake, and due to the logic error, the certificate would be incorrectly accepted as valid, granting unauthorized access to protected resources or enabling man-in-the-middle attacks. The high attack complexity suggests the attacker would need specific knowledge of the target's CRL configuration and potentially need to time their attack when partitioned CRLs are in use. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Mar 19, 2026
A logic error in AWS-LC's CRL (Certificate Revocation List) distribution point validation causes the cryptographic library to incorrectly reject partitioned CRLs as out of scope, allowing revoked certificates to bypass certificate revocation checks. This authentication bypass vulnerability affects AWS-LC versions before 1.71.0 and AWS-LC-FIPS versions before 3.3.0, potentially allowing attackers to use revoked certificates for unauthorized access to systems that rely on AWS-LC for certificate validation. No active exploitation has been reported in KEV, and no EPSS score is available yet.
RemediationAI
Upgrade AWS-LC to version 1.71.0 or later, or AWS-LC-FIPS to version 3.3.0 or later as detailed in the vendor's security bulletin at https://aws.amazon.com/security/security-bulletins/2026-010-AWS/. The patched versions are available at https://github.com/aws/aws-lc/releases/tag/v1.71.0. As an interim mitigation, organizations could disable partitioned CRL checking if feasible, though this may impact performance with large CRLs. Additionally, implement defense-in-depth measures such as certificate pinning for critical services and monitor for unexpected certificate usage patterns. Given the authentication bypass nature of this vulnerability, expedite patching for internet-facing services that rely on certificate revocation for access control.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 4 packages in cargo, euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
AWS-LC is Amazon's fork of BoringSSL, a cryptographic library used for TLS/SSL implementations and certificate validation. The vulnerability stems from a logic error (CWE-299: Improper Check for Certificate Revocation) in how the library validates Certificate Revocation List distribution points, specifically when dealing with partitioned CRLs - a mechanism where large CRLs are split into smaller segments for efficiency. The affected products are identified through CPE as cpe:2.3:a:aws:aws-lc:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* (versions before 1.71.0) and cpe:2.3:a:aws:aws-lc-fips:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* (versions before 3.3.0). This flaw allows certificates that should be marked as revoked to be accepted as valid, undermining the entire certificate revocation infrastructure.
Know when AWS gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Primary rating from NVD.
CVSS VectorNVD
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionCVE.org
A logic error in CRL distribution point validation in AWS-LC before 1.71.0 causes partitioned CRLs to be incorrectly rejected as out of scope, which allows a revoked certificate to bypass certificate revocation checks.
To remediate this issue, users should upgrade to AWS-LC 1.71.0 or AWS-LC-FIPS-3.3.0.
Executive ViewAI
A critical vulnerability in AWS-LC cryptographic library allows attackers to bypass certificate revocation checks, potentially enabling the use of revoked certificates for fraudulent transactions or unauthorized access. This affects any organization using AWS-LC in certificate validation workflows, creating immediate risk to authentication and trust mechanisms.
Apply vendor patch.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.
Loom for AWS deployments running a version before 1.6.1 with no identity provider configured expose an unauthenticated s
Unauthorized data access in Budibase low-code platform before 3.30.4 allows unauthenticated users to manipulate internal
Authenticated Typebot users can abuse the webhook block (HTTP Request component) in versions prior to 3.13.1 to issue ar
Multiple vulnerabilities in ASTPP 4.0.1 including XSS and command injection in SIP device configuration and plugin manag
Remote code execution in Amazon awslabs postgres-mcp-server before 1.1.7 lets remote actors run arbitrary OS commands on
Remote code execution in AWS AgentCore CLI before v0.14.2 allows authenticated attackers to inject Python code via craft
Denial of service in the aws-smithy-json Rust runtime crate (versions before 0.62.7) lets remote unauthenticated attacke
Denial of service in Amazon's aws-smithy-http-server Rust crate (versions prior to 0.66.5) lets remote unauthenticated a
Argument injection in the AWS Bedrock AgentCore Python SDK before 1.18.1 lets a remote authenticated user run arbitrary
Arbitrary file read in amazon-mq rabbitmq-aws before 0.2.1 allows authenticated remote users to read any file accessible
WAF managed-rule body inspection on AWS Application Load Balancer (ALB) can be bypassed by remote actors who fragment an
WAF inspection bypass in Amazon CloudFront (with AWS WAF enabled) lets remote actors smuggle malicious request bodies pa
EUVD-2026-13237
GHSA-9f94-5g5w-gf6r
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
VulDB
Exploit-DB