Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessGain adjacent network position
-
DeliveryIdentify proxy lacking service CA
-
ExploitIntercept proxy-to-backend traffic
-
ExecutionCapture cluster-scoped impersonation token
-
ImpactReplay token for cluster admin
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A07:2025 - Authentication Failures
ASVS 5.0
V12 - Secure Communication Certificate validation
|
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires a specific deployment condition: the konflux-ci environment must LACK a default service certificate authority, which triggers the UI proxy to automatically disable TLS certificate verification on connections to internal backend services. The attacker must (1) hold low-privilege authenticated access (CVSS PR:L), (2) occupy an adjacent network position able to intercept the proxy-to-backend traffic (CVSS AV:A - not remotely exploitable across the internet), and (3) succeed against the high-complexity condition (AC:H) that the service-CA is absent. Limiting factors that reduce real-world risk: the flaw does not apply to environments that do provision a default service certificate authority (the default-secure case), requires prior authentication, and requires on-path network adjacency rather than remote reach. |
| Impact | Signals are moderately strong but not top-tier. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:A/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H, base 8.0 High) tells a coherent story: the attacker must be adjacent (on the same network segment as the proxy-to-backend traffic), must already hold low-level authenticated access (PR:L), and faces high attack complexity (AC:H) because exploitation depends on a specific, non-default condition - the environment lacking a default service certificate authority, which causes the proxy to disable TLS verification. The payoff is severe: capturing a cluster-scoped impersonation token yields full cluster administrative control, justifying the scope change (S:C) and C:H/I:H/A:H. The vuln.today decision label is 'this_week' rather than act_now/emergency, consistent with a serious but conditioned flaw. EPSS is not provided in the input, so exploitation probability cannot be quantified. There is no CISA KEV listing and no public exploit reference in the input, so this is no public exploit identified at time of analysis. Net assessment: a genuine, high-impact escalation path worth prioritized remediation, but gated by adjacency, prior authentication, and a specific missing-service-CA misconfiguration - not a mass-exploitable internet-facing issue. The real-risk picture is bounded chiefly by AC:H and AV:A, not inflated by the 8.0 score. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | In a konflux-ci deployment that lacks a default service certificate authority, the UI proxy silently turns off TLS certificate verification for its connections to internal backend services and attaches a cluster-scoped token carrying user-impersonation rights. An attacker with a foothold on an adjacent network segment positions themselves to intercept this proxy-to-backend traffic (e.g. via ARP spoofing or an on-path position) and captures the impersonation token. Replaying that token against the cluster API grants full administrative control. No public exploit reference is provided in the input. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 31, 2026
Privilege escalation in konflux-ci allows an adjacent-network attacker with low-privilege authenticated access to capture a cluster-scoped impersonation token from the UI proxy when the environment lacks a default service certificate authority, yielding full administrative control of the cluster. The proxy disables TLS certificate verification for internal backend connections under that condition and attaches the token to those requests. Exploitation requires on-path network adjacency and the missing-service-CA deployment state; no public exploit was identified at time of analysis and active exploitation is not confirmed.
RemediationAI
No exact vendor fix version is specified in the supplied data; check the Red Hat advisory at https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-117681 and Bugzilla at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2563233 for current patch or update guidance. The primary mitigation indicated by the flaw condition is to ensure a default service certificate authority is provisioned in the konflux-ci environment so the UI proxy does not automatically disable TLS certificate verification for internal backend connections, and to verify that backend certificate validation remains enabled; this requires cluster-level configuration changes and may affect services that depend on the current trust setup. Because exploitation requires an on-path adjacent-network position, restrict network access between the UI proxy and internal backend services and segment that traffic; this can reduce exposure but may complicate legitimate proxy-to-backend communication and should be validated against the deployment architecture.
Affected ProductsAI
konflux-ci, specifically deployments of its UI proxy that lack a default service certificate authority. The supplied intelligence does not include a version range or CPE strings, so a precise affected-version list cannot be confirmed from the available data. Vendor references are the Red Hat CVE page at https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-117681 and Red Hat Bugzilla 2563233 at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2563233.
Affects your stack
Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
konflux-ci is a CI/CD platform whose UI proxy communicates with internal backend services. When no default service certificate authority exists in the environment, the proxy automatically disables TLS certificate verification for those backend connections. This is CWE-295, Improper Certificate Validation: the proxy accepts backend connections without validating the server certificate, so an attacker positioned on the adjacent network can intercept traffic and obtain the cluster-scoped authentication token that the proxy attaches with user impersonation rights. The assessed CVSS vector indicates adjacent network access (AV:A), low privileges (PR:L), high attack complexity (AC:H), no user interaction, changed scope, and high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact. Exposure is limited by the high-complexity condition that the service CA is absent, the need for prior authentication, and the need for on-path adjacency; environments that provision a default service certificate authority are not described as affected by this trigger. No CPE data was supplied, so exact version mapping cannot be confirmed from the available data.
Know when the next one hits your stack
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:A/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Adjacent on-path interception (AV:A), dependent on the non-default missing-service-CA condition (AC:H), needs prior low-priv auth (PR:L), and a captured cluster-admin token impacts systems beyond the proxy (S:C, C/I/A:H).
Primary rating from Vendor (redhat).
CVSS VectorNVD
DescriptionNVD
A flaw was found in konflux-ci. This vulnerability allows privilege escalation when the user interface proxy automatically disables Transport Layer Security (TLS) certificate verification for connections to internal backend services in environments lacking a default service certificate authority. Because the proxy attaches a cluster-scoped authentication token with user impersonation rights to these requests, an adjacent network attacker capable of intercepting traffic can capture the credentials to gain full administrative control of the cluster.
Executive ViewAI
CVE-2026-117681 is a high-severity privilege escalation vulnerability in konflux-ci, the continuous integration and delivery platform used by our engineering organization. Under specific deployment conditions, an attacker with low-privilege authenticated access and network adjacency could capture a cluster-scoped impersonation token and gain full administrative control of the cluster. This puts the integrity and availability of our software supply chain and intellectual property at risk, and leadership should prioritize remediation.
No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Implement network segmentation to block adjacent-network access to the UI proxy, configure a default service certificate authority or trusted internal CA, enable TLS certificate verification for internal backend connections, rotate service account tokens, and enforce least privilege for authenticated users.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Privilege escalation occurs when an attacker leverages flaws in access control mechanisms to gain permissions beyond what they were originally granted.
EUVD-2026-114682
GHSA-6rhq-p65w-3v27
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Exploit-DB