Skip to main content

LeadSnap EUVDEUVD-2026-114296

| CVE-2026-90888 CRITICAL
Deserialization of Untrusted Data (CWE-502)
2026-10-30 Patchstack GHSA-27wj-mp2h-85jg
9.8
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: Patchstack
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Identify site running LeadSnap <= 1.25
  2. Delivery
    Send crafted serialized PHP object
  3. Exploit
    Reach vulnerable unserialize() call
  4. Execution
    Instantiate POP gadget chain
  5. Impact
    Compromise site data or server

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A08:2025 - Software or Data Integrity Failures
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Safe deserialization, type allowlists
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Execution, Initial Access

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Requires a target running the LeadSnap WordPress plugin at version 1.25 or earlier, with the vulnerable code path reachable by an unauthenticated remote request (consistent with PR:N/UI:N). The specific endpoint, parameter, or feature that passes attacker input to unserialize() is not described in the available sources. A critical practical limiter not quantified in the input: realized impact beyond object instantiation (RCE/file/SQL effects) generally depends on a usable POP gadget chain being present in the plugin or co-installed components - the evidence does not confirm one exists, so the full C:H/I:H/A:H impact is a worst-case assumption rather than a verified outcome.

Impact

Signals are largely aligned toward high priority but rest on a single source. The supplied CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N, C:H/I:H/A:H, score 9.8) describes a network-reachable, low-complexity, unauthenticated flaw with full confidentiality, integrity and availability impact, and the vuln.today decision label is act_now. However, several real-risk signals are absent from the input: there is no EPSS probability, no CISA KEV listing, and no confirmed public exploit code - the only reference is a Patchstack advisory page, not a working PoC. So the urgency is driven by severity rating and vendor triage rather than by observed exploitation. PHP Object Injection (CWE-502) is a genuinely dangerous class, but practical impact (RCE, arbitrary file operations, SQL injection, etc.) typically depends on a usable POP gadget chain being reachable in the plugin or co-installed code; the available evidence does not confirm which concrete impact is achievable, so the uniform C:H/I:H/A:H should be treated as a worst-case rating, not a demonstrated outcome. Net: following the act_now label this warrants prompt remediation, but the absence of EPSS/KEV/PoC data means confidence that it is being exploited at scale is low and should not be overstated.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

A remote attacker sends a crafted request to a vulnerable LeadSnap endpoint containing an attacker-controlled serialized PHP object, which the plugin passes to unserialize() without authentication. If a suitable POP gadget chain is reachable in the plugin or the WordPress environment, this can escalate to code execution, file manipulation, or data compromise. No confirmed working public exploit was identified in the provided data; the only reference is a Patchstack advisory entry.

Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Why: CRITICAL severity.
No patch listed yet 0.3% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 30, 2026

Unauthenticated PHP object injection in the LeadSnap WordPress plugin through version 1.25 can let a remote attacker reach a PHP unserialize() path with attacker-influenced data, carrying a CVSS 3.1 score of 9.8 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H) and CWE-502. The supplied CPE identifies the LeadSnap plugin, and the Patchstack advisory is the sole reference in the provided intelligence; no CISA KEV entry or public exploit code is reported, so no public exploit identified at time of analysis. The C:H/I:H/A:H rating is a worst-case assumption: effects beyond object instantiation depend on a usable POP gadget chain in the plugin or co-installed components, which the available evidence does not confirm.

RemediationAI

No vendor-released patch, fixed version, patch commit, or vendor workaround is identified in the provided sources; check the Patchstack advisory at https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/leadsnap/vulnerability/wordpress-leadsnap-plugin-1-25-php-object-injection-vulnerability?_s_id=cve for an updated fixed release and upgrade LeadSnap beyond 1.25 when one is published. Because the assessed vector is PR:N/UI:N, exposure is remote and unauthenticated; if the plugin cannot be updated immediately, the direct containment step is to deactivate and remove LeadSnap, or otherwise remove the vulnerable code path from reachable web exposure, accepting the loss of the plugin's functionality. These are operational containment measures, not vendor-documented fixes.

Affected VersionsENISA

LeadSnap n/a ≤1.25

Affected Packages

euvd leadsnap no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

LeadSnap is a WordPress plugin, and CVE-2026-90888 is classified as CWE-502 Deserialization of Untrusted Data. PHP object injection occurs when untrusted input reaches unserialize(), allowing attacker-controlled serialized strings to instantiate objects and potentially invoke magic methods; the specific endpoint, parameter, or feature that passes attacker input to unserialize() is not described in the available sources. The supplied CVSS vector AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U indicates network reachability, low attack complexity, no required privileges, and no user interaction, per the assessed vector. The CPE cpe:2.3:a:leadsnap:leadsnap:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* identifies the plugin as the affected product, while the Patchstack advisory scopes affected versions to 1.25 and earlier. Realized confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact beyond object instantiation depends on a usable POP gadget chain being present in the plugin or co-installed components; the provided data does not verify that such a chain exists, so the full C:H/I:H/A:H outcome is not confirmed.

Know when PHP gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (Patchstack) PRIMARY 9.8 CRITICAL
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 9.8 CRITICAL

Description states unauthenticated, network-reachable object injection (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N); impact retained at C:H/I:H/A:H as worst-case for CWE-502, though gadget-chain dependence is unverified.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (Patchstack).

CVSS VectorVendor: Patchstack

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

DescriptionCVE.org

Unauthenticated PHP Object Injection in LeadSnap <= 1.25 versions.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

The LeadSnap WordPress plugin (versions up to 1.25) contains a critical unauthenticated PHP object injection vulnerability that could allow remote attackers to compromise the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of affected websites. Leadership should prioritize remediation for any public-facing WordPress sites running this plugin, as exploitation could lead to full site takeover and potential data breaches.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations include disabling the LeadSnap plugin on internet-facing sites, deploying WAF rules to detect and block PHP object injection attempts, restricting access to wp-admin and REST endpoints, and closely monitoring logs for anomalous serialized data in requests.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.3%
Top 75% exploitable
Prevalence
Low
niche WordPress lead-generation plugin, limited install base
Social Media
1
Sightings
Data Quality
4 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity CRITICAL
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.3%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
CRITICAL severity
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
Yes
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

49
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +49
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Insecure deserialization occurs when an application converts serialized data (a stream of bytes representing an object's state) back into a living object without proper validation.

More in PHP

View all
CVE-2019-11043 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Oct 28

In PHP versions 7.1.x below 7.1.33, 7.2.x below 7.2.24 and 7.3.x below 7.3.11 in certain configurations of FPM setup it

CVE-2012-1823 CRITICAL POC
9.8 May 11

sapi/cgi/cgi_main.c in PHP before 5.3.12 and 5.4.x before 5.4.2, when configured as a CGI script (aka php-cgi), does not

CVE-2016-1555 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Apr 21

(1) boardData102.php, (2) boardData103.php, (3) boardDataJP.php, (4) boardDataNA.php, and (5) boardDataWW.php in Netgear

CVE-2018-11138 CRITICAL POC
9.8 May 31

The '/common/download_agent_installer.php' script in the Quest KACE System Management Appliance 8.0.318 is accessible by

CVE-2024-11680 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Nov 26

ProjectSend versions prior to r1720 are affected by an improper authentication vulnerability. Rated critical severity (C

CVE-2025-49113 CRITICAL POC
9.9 Jun 02

Roundcube Webmail contains a critical PHP object deserialization vulnerability (CVE-2025-49113, CVSS 9.9) that allows au

CVE-2017-9841 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jun 27

Util/PHP/eval-stdin.php in PHPUnit before 4.8.28 and 5.x before 5.6.3 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary PHP c

CVE-2025-0108 HIGH POC
8.8 Feb 12

Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS management web interface contains an authentication bypass allowing unauthenticated attackers

CVE-2021-25298 HIGH POC
8.8 Feb 15

Nagios XI version xi-5.7.5 is affected by OS command injection. Rated high severity (CVSS 8.8), this vulnerability is re

CVE-2021-25296 HIGH POC
8.8 Feb 15

Nagios XI version xi-5.7.5 is affected by OS command injection. Rated high severity (CVSS 8.8), this vulnerability is re

CVE-2013-4983 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Sep 10

The get_referers function in /opt/ws/bin/sblistpack in Sophos Web Appliance before 3.7.9.1 and 3.8 before 3.8.1.1 allows

CVE-2023-6553 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Dec 15

The Backup Migration plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Remote Code Execution in all versions up to, and including, 1

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy