Skip to main content

Xenia M2M Platform EUVDEUVD-2026-112677

| CVE-2026-114358 CRITICAL
SQL Injection (CWE-89)
2026-10-29 CERT-In GHSA-cgx5-hf2m-237r
9.3
CVSS 4.0 · Vendor: CERT-In
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Reach web management interface
  2. Delivery
    Submit crafted SQL in password-recovery fields
  3. Exploit
    Injected query executes on backend database
  4. Execution
    Enumerate schema and read sensitive records
  5. Impact
    Modify database records

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Parameterized queries, prepared statements
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Persistence

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

The required entry point is specific: the password-recovery functionality within the Radius Xenia M2M Platform web management interface, reached over the network. Per the CVSS vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N), exploitation needs no authentication, no user interaction, and low complexity - so the practical prerequisite is simply network reachability to the web management interface. The main limiting factor is therefore exposure: instances whose management interface is not reachable from the attacker's network position (e.g., behind segmentation or not internet-facing) are not exploitable by remote attackers. No specific non-default configuration is called out in the advisory as a precondition.

Impact

This is a genuinely high-priority issue, not an inflated high-CVSS score. The signals align consistently: the CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N) describes a network-reachable, low-complexity, unauthenticated flaw requiring no user interaction, and the vuln.today decision label is act_now, reflecting the ease of exploitation of a classic SQL injection (CWE-89) in an internet-facing password-recovery endpoint. The impact metrics (VC:H/VI:H, VA:N) match the description: confidentiality and integrity are heavily affected (read and modify database records) while availability is not directly impacted. That said, several decision signals are MISSING rather than conflicting: no EPSS probability is provided, there is no CISA KEV listing (CERT-In, not CISA, is the reporting body, and KEV tracks U.S. federal exploitation cases), and no SSVC exploitation/automatable sub-values are supplied beyond the act_now label. No public exploit was identified at time of analysis. The absence of EPSS/KEV data should not be read as low risk - it is simply unavailable; an unauthenticated SQLi on a web management interface is characteristically easy to weaponize and discover via automated scanning, which is consistent with the act_now prioritization.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An unauthenticated remote attacker locates the web management interface of a Radius Xenia M2M Platform instance and submits crafted SQL in the password-recovery input fields. Because input is insufficiently validated, the injected query executes against the backend database, letting the attacker enumerate the schema, read sensitive records, or modify data. The low attack complexity and lack of required authentication or user interaction make this straightforward to automate; no public exploit code was identified at time of analysis.

Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Why: CRITICAL severity.
No patch listed yet 0.5% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 29, 2026

Unauthenticated SQL injection in the password-recovery functionality of the Radius Xenia M2M Platform web management interface can let a remote attacker read sensitive data, enumerate the database schema, or alter records. The issue is rated 9.3 (CVSS 4.0) and is prioritized act_now by vuln.today; no public exploit identified at time of analysis, and no CISA KEV listing is provided. Exposure is the key constraint: only instances whose management interface is reachable from the attacker's network position are at risk.

RemediationAI

No vendor-released patch or fixed version is identified in the supplied data; the CERT-In advisory (https://www.cert-in.org.in/s2cMainServlet?pageid=PUBVLNOTES01&VLCODE=CIVN-2026-0529) is the only reference provided. Until a vendor fix is available, reduce exposure by restricting network access to the web management interface - place it behind VPN/segmentation and block internet-facing access - with the trade-off that remote administrators must use the trusted path. If password recovery is not required, consider disabling that function or restricting it to trusted networks; the trade-off is loss of self-service account recovery. Monitor password-recovery requests and database logs for SQL-injection indicators, and apply the vendor update as soon as a patched version is published.

Affected VersionsENISA

Radius Xenia M2M Platform Version

Affects your stack

Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The affected component is the web management interface of Radius Xenia M2M Platform, specifically its password-recovery flow. The root cause is CWE-89 (SQL injection): user-supplied input from password-recovery fields is not sufficiently validated before being used in database queries, so crafted SQL can influence query logic. The supplied CPE (cpe:2.3:a:radius_synergies:radius_xenia_m2m_platform:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*) uses a wildcard version, so no specific affected release range is stated in the available data; the trigger is tied to the password-recovery input fields, and no other deployment-specific preconditions are called out. The CVSS 4.0 vector shows PR:N/UI:N, confirming unauthenticated, no-interaction exploitation, with the main practical limit being network reachability.

Know when Radius Xenia M2M Platform gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (CERT-In) PRIMARY 9.3 CRITICAL
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
vuln.today AI 9.1 CRITICAL

Unauthenticated network-reachable SQLi (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N); read and modify of database records gives C:H/I:H, with no availability impact (A:N) and no scope change.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (CERT-In).

CVSS VectorVendor: CERT-In

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
None
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
High
Vulnerable system: Integrity
High
Vulnerable system: Availability
None
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
None
Subsequent system: Integrity
None
Subsequent system: Availability
None

DescriptionCVE.org

This vulnerability exists in the Radius Xenia M2M Platform due to insufficient validation of user supplied input in the password recovery functionality in the web management interface. An unauthenticated remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability by supplying crafted SQL query through input fields to the targeted system.

Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could allow the attacker to gain unauthorized access to sensitive information, enumerate database structure or modify database records on the targeted system.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

The Radius Xenia M2M Platform contains a critical SQL injection flaw in its password-recovery function, enabling unauthenticated attackers to read or alter sensitive database records. If the management interface is exposed, this could lead to unauthorized access to machine-to-machine communications and data integrity loss. Leadership should prioritize immediate containment because the platform likely underpins critical IoT or M2M operations.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Restrict management interface access to trusted networks, deploy a WAF with virtual patching for SQL injection, and enable database activity monitoring with anomaly detection.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.5%
Top 57% exploitable
Prevalence
Low
niche M2M IoT platform from a single vendor, industry-specific footprint
Social Media
4
Sightings
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity CRITICAL
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.5%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
CRITICAL severity
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
Yes
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

47
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: +1
CVSS: +46
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

SQL injection exploits the way applications construct database queries by mixing user input directly into SQL statements.

Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy