Skip to main content

Ravenfield EUVDEUVD-2026-109579

| CVE-2026-116098 MEDIUM
Deserialization of Untrusted Data (CWE-502)
2026-10-25 VulDB GHSA-623g-5673-24x6
5.3
CVSS 4.0 · Vendor: VulDB
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Attacker crafts malicious custom map
  2. Exploit
    Victim loads map in Ravenfield
  3. Execution
    RFL/RFLD handler deserializes untrusted data in cacheCoverPoints
  4. Impact
    Attacker-controlled code or state executes on victim

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A08:2025 - Software or Data Integrity Failures
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Safe deserialization, type allowlists
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Execution, Initial Access

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires the victim to load an attacker-supplied custom map that is processed by Ravenfield's RFL/RFLD Custom Map Handler, whose cacheCoverPoints function deserializes untrusted data (CWE-502). The key limiting factor is user interaction (CVSS UI:P): the attacker cannot trigger this remotely without the player opening/subscribing to and loading the malicious map, so it is a client-side, content-driven attack rather than an unattended network service exploit. No authentication is required (PR:N). The precise trigger mechanics beyond 'manipulation results in deserialization' are not detailed in the available sources.

Impact

Signals are moderate but notably conflicting. The supplied CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P) yields a 5.3 (medium) score driven down by low vulnerable-system impacts (VC:L/VI:L/VA:L), yet the vulnerability class is CWE-502 (deserialization) and one of the references is a blog explicitly titled a 'one-click remote code execution in Ravenfield' - an RCE claim that is hard to reconcile with the low C/I/A metrics assigned by VulDB. This CVSS-vs-reference conflict should be verified: if the deserialization genuinely yields code execution on the player's machine, the real severity is substantially higher than 5.3. No EPSS score is provided, so statistical exploitation probability cannot be weighed. The CVE is NOT listed in CISA KEV, so there is no confirmed active exploitation; the exploitation status is therefore that a public PoC reference (the drbloop.dev write-up) exists but is not verified here as working exploit code. UI:P means successful attack depends on the victim performing an action (loading a custom map), which materially limits mass/automatable exploitation and points toward opportunistic client-side targeting rather than server-side mass compromise. The vuln.today decision label is 'this_month' (not act_now/emergency), consistent with a real but non-emergency priority. Net: treat as a genuine client-side issue worth patching this cycle, but independently verify whether impact is low (as scored) or full RCE (as the reference implies).

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker publishes or shares a crafted Ravenfield custom map containing malicious serialized data. When a victim loads that map, the RFL/RFLD Custom Map Handler's cacheCoverPoints function deserializes the attacker-controlled data, triggering the flaw; a public write-up describing this as a one-click RCE exists, though it is not verified here as working exploit code. Because UI:P applies, the victim must actually load the malicious map for the attack to succeed.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
Patch available 0.3% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 26, 2026

Risk signals are moderate but notably conflicting: the published CVSS 4.0 score is 5.3, while the independent CVSS 3.1 assessment is 8.8 because successful exploitation can produce high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact. Deserialization in SteelRaven7 Ravenfield's RFL/RFLD custom map handler (cacheCoverPoints) allows unauthenticated remote attackers to execute code when a player loads an attacker-supplied custom map, with user interaction required. A vendor patch named 'EA39 Security Patch' is available, a public technical writeup is referenced but working exploit code is not confirmed by the provided data, and KEV status is not indicated; the vuln.today decision label is this_month.

RemediationAI

Apply the vendor's 'EA39 Security Patch' through the Steam update for Ravenfield (app 636480). Patch availability is reported from the vendor, and the vendor advisory is https://steamcommunity.com/app/636480/events/590690402783479125. No exact patched version number is provided in the available data, so verify that the installed Steam build includes the EA39 Security Patch. Until updated, exposure is reduced by not loading custom maps from untrusted sources, because exploitation requires the victim to load an attacker-supplied map; this is an exposure-reduction measure rather than a complete fix. The VulDB entry is https://vuldb.com/vuln/426166.

Affected VersionsENISA

Ravenfield 25407073

Affects your stack

Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

CWE-502 (Deserialization of Untrusted Data) is the root cause. Ravenfield's RFL/RFLD Custom Map Handler processes community-authored map content, and the cacheCoverPoints function deserializes data from those files without adequate validation of the object graph being reconstructed. Because custom maps are content the client loads, the attack path is client-side and content-driven: the victim must open or subscribe to and then load a malicious map, corresponding to UI:P in the CVSS 4.0 vector and UI:R in the independent CVSS 3.1 vector. The network vector is AV:N because the map can be delivered remotely, but the trigger is not an unattended network service; the precise trigger mechanics beyond 'manipulation results in deserialization' are not described in the available sources. CPE cpe:2.3:a:steelraven7:ravenfield:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* identifies SteelRaven7 Ravenfield with a wildcard version range.

Know when Ravenfield gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (VulDB) PRIMARY 5.3 MEDIUM
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
vuln.today AI 8.8 HIGH

Deserialization of an untrusted custom map (CWE-502) with a one-click RCE reference implies code execution, so C/I/A:H; remote delivery gives AV:N but loading the map forces UI:R.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (VulDB).

CVSS VectorVendor: VulDB

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
None
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
Passive
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
Low
Vulnerable system: Integrity
Low
Vulnerable system: Availability
Low
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
None
Subsequent system: Integrity
None
Subsequent system: Availability
None

DescriptionCVE.org

A vulnerability was detected in SteelRaven7 Ravenfield 25407073. This vulnerability affects the function cacheCoverPoints of the component RFL Custom Map Handler/RFLD Custom Map Handler. Performing a manipulation results in deserialization. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The patch is named EA39 Security Patch. Applying a patch is the recommended action to fix this issue.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.3%
Top 82% exploitable
Prevalence
Low
indie consumer Steam game, no enterprise or production-server footprint
Social Media
2
Sightings
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.3%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation· derived
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable· derived
No
Human Impact· derived
Medium

Priority Score

26
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +26
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Insecure deserialization occurs when an application converts serialized data (a stream of bytes representing an object's state) back into a living object without proper validation.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy