Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessAuthenticate as high-privilege admin
-
DeliveryInject script into Speed Optimizer setting
-
ExploitPayload stored unescaped in page <head>
-
ExecutionVictim loads front-end page
-
ImpactScript executes in browser
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Output encoding, context-aware escaping
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Execution The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires an authenticated high-privilege user (PR:H, e.g. an administrator) who can edit Speed Optimizer plugin settings, and a victim must subsequently load a front-end page for the stored payload in the page <head> to fire (UI:R). The condition that gives this flaw meaning is the absence of the unfiltered_html capability - explicitly the multisite scenario named in the description - because in a normal single-site install an admin already has unfiltered_html and could inject scripts legitimately. Limiting factors: no unauthenticated path, requires admin-level access plus victim interaction, and the added risk only materializes where unfiltered_html is disallowed; impact is confined to the browser context of users viewing affected pages. |
| Impact | This is a genuinely low-priority issue, and the signals are consistent rather than conflicting. The CVSS 3.1 base score is 3.5 (Low) with vector AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N: although the attack vector is network, exploitation requires PR:H (a high-privilege account such as an administrator) plus UI:R (a victim must load the affected page), and impact is limited (C:L/I:L, A:N). The SSVC decision framework reinforces this: Exploitation=none, Automatable=no, Technical Impact=partial, and the vuln.today priority is 'monitor'. There is no CISA KEV listing. No EPSS score was supplied in the input, so exploitation-probability cannot be quantified here - this is a missing signal, not a low one. The practical reason the bug is minor is that in a standard single-site WordPress install an administrator already holds the unfiltered_html capability and can legitimately inject arbitrary HTML/JS; the flaw only adds real privilege in configurations (notably multisite) where admins are deliberately denied unfiltered_html. Taken together, this is a high-CVSS-is-not-the-case, low-real-risk, authenticated self-/peer-XSS issue that warrants patching in routine maintenance rather than emergency response. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | In a WordPress multisite environment where site administrators are denied the unfiltered_html capability, a malicious or compromised admin enters a JavaScript payload into one of the Speed Optimizer settings that is echoed unsanitized into the <head> of front-end pages. When any visitor (including higher-privileged network users) loads an affected page, the script executes in their browser. No confirmed public exploit code was identified in the provided data. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 23, 2026
Stored cross-site scripting in the Speed Optimizer WordPress plugin before 7.8.5 lets a high-privilege user, such as an administrator, inject script into plugin settings that is then written unescaped into the <head> of front-end pages. The flaw matters mainly in deployments where the unfiltered_html capability is stripped - classically a multisite network - so that a site admin who could not otherwise embed scripts can still persist one; a victim must load an affected front-end page for the payload to fire. Severity is low (CVSS 3.5, PR:H/UI:R): there is no unauthenticated path, no public exploit identified at time of analysis, no CISA KEV listing, and CISA SSVC records exploitation as none with partial technical impact, so this is a monitor-level item rather than an emergency.
RemediationAI
Vendor-released patch: upgrade the Speed Optimizer plugin to 7.8.5 or later, which is the fixed version recorded in the vendor advisory at https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/308b6173-139d-4940-869d-c9ff1e83c323/ (also reachable via the NVD entry https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-111737). Because the flaw requires an administrator to save the malicious setting and a victim to load a front-end page, restrict plugin-settings access to trusted administrators only and review existing Speed Optimizer settings for injected markup as part of the upgrade; on multisite networks, confirm that unfiltered_html remains disallowed for site admins so the boundary this flaw bypasses stays meaningful. No public exploit code was identified at time of analysis and CISA SSVC records exploitation as none, so the update can be scheduled through normal maintenance rather than emergency change; there is no vendor-documented workaround beyond updating.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The vulnerability is a CWE-79 cross-site scripting flaw rooted in missing output encoding. Speed Optimizer stores several of its configuration options (the settings a site administrator manages in the plugin's admin screens) and later prints them directly into the HTML <head> block of front-end pages without sanitising on input or escaping on output, so markup supplied in a setting is rendered as live HTML in every visitor's browser. The relevant nuance is the WordPress capability model: unfiltered_html normally permits administrators to embed arbitrary markup, so the same behaviour is expected rather than a boundary crossing on a single-site install. In a multisite network, or wherever the capability is disallowed, administrators are supposed to be constrained, and this plugin's unescaped output defeats that constraint - the reason the CVSS vector carries PR:H while impact stays limited (C:L/I:L) and scope unchanged. The CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N vector reflects a network-reachable admin interface, no special attack complexity, admin-level privileges required, and victim interaction needed for the stored payload to execute, with confidentiality and integrity impact confined to the victim's browser session and no availability effect.
Know when WordPress gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Admin-level access to plugin settings forces PR:H and a victim page load forces UI:R; stored XSS yields limited C:L/I:L with no availability impact, matching the supplied vector.
Primary rating from Vendor (wpscan).
CVSS VectorVendor: wpscan
Lifecycle Timeline
4DescriptionCVE.org
The Speed Optimizer WordPress plugin before 7.8.5 does not sanitise or escape some of its settings before outputting them in the head of front-end pages, which could allow high-privilege users such as admins to perform Stored Cross-Site Scripting attacks even when the unfiltered_html capability is disallowed (for example in a multisite setup).
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Cross-Site Scripting occurs when an application accepts untrusted data and sends it to a web browser without proper validation or encoding.
The mailSend function in the isMail transport in PHPMailer before 5.2.18 might allow remote attackers to pass extra para
The isMail transport in PHPMailer before 5.2.20 might allow remote attackers to pass extra parameters to the mail comman
The Backup Migration plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Remote Code Execution in all versions up to, and including, 1
The Hash Form - Drag & Drop Form Builder plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary file uploads due to missing fil
Authentication bypass in the LiteSpeed Cache WordPress plugin (versions prior to 6.5.0.1) allows unauthenticated remote
The GiveWP - Donation Plugin and Fundraising Platform plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to PHP Object Injection in all
The Simple File List plugin for WordPress through version 4.2.2 contains an unauthenticated remote code execution vulner
The AI Engine WordPress plugin through version 3.1.3 exposes Bearer Token values through the /mcp/v1/ REST API endpoint
The SureTriggers WordPress plugin through version 1.0.82 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows unaut
The Ninja Forms plugin before 2.9.42.1 for WordPress allows remote attackers to conduct PHP object injection attacks via
The Business Directory Plugin - Easy Listing Directories for WordPress plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to time-based
Remote code execution in WordPress 6.9.x (before 6.9.5) and 7.0.x (before 7.0.2) arises from a REST API batch endpoint r
EUVD-2026-108592
GHSA-hhfq-xfxp-vh74
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB