Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessCraft malicious HTTP payload/link
-
DeliveryDeliver to legitimate PLM user
-
ExploitVictim interaction triggers injection
-
ExecutionRead or alter critical PLM data
-
ImpactPivot to impacted additional products
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V8 - Authorization Access control enforcement
MITRE ATT&CK
1 technique across 1 tactic: Defense Evasion The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires a victim interaction: a legitimate user other than the attacker must perform an action (UI:R) such as opening an attacker-crafted link or viewing attacker-controlled content within Oracle Agile PLM for Process 6.2.4 - the attacker alone cannot complete the attack. No authentication is required of the attacker (PR:N), and the vector is remote over HTTP (AV:N/AC:L), so any default internet- or intranet-reachable 6.2.4 instance whose users can be socially engineered is exposed. The scope change (S:C) means successful exploitation can extend beyond the PLM application into additional connected products. The need for a second human and the restriction to version 6.2.4 are the primary limiting factors; availability is unaffected (A:N). |
| Impact | This is a genuine high-priority issue by CVSS signal: the vendor-supplied CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N, base 9.3) indicates network-reachable, low-complexity, unauthenticated exploitation with high confidentiality and integrity impact and a scope change affecting additional products. The one meaningful brake is UI:R - a legitimate user other than the attacker must perform an action (typically clicking a crafted link or viewing attacker-controlled content), which moves this out of the fully-wormable/automatable category and toward targeted or social-engineering-driven exploitation. No EPSS score, no CISA KEV listing, and no POC were supplied in the input, so exploitation probability cannot be quantified and there is no evidence of active exploitation - treat the 9.3 as a theoretical-severity ceiling, not a confirmed real-world exploitation signal. The AV:N / PR:N / UI:R / S:C / C:H / I:H / A:N profile is characteristic of a stored or reflected cross-site-scripting / injection-style flaw rather than a true authentication bypass; the 'Authentication Bypass' tag conflicts with this vector and with the description (which never claims auth bypass) and should be verified against the Oracle advisory. Net: prioritize patching in Agile PLM for Process 6.2.4 environments, but the required user interaction and absence of EPSS/KEV/POC data make this high-but-not-emergency unless Oracle or telemetry shows exploitation. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An unauthenticated attacker crafts a malicious HTTP request or link containing an injection payload targeting Oracle Agile PLM for Process 6.2.4, then lures a legitimate application user into triggering it (e.g., opening the link or viewing a poisoned record). When the victim's browser or session processes the payload, it executes in the application context, letting the attacker read or modify critical PLM data and pivot to additional products due to the scope change. No public exploit code was identified at time of analysis. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 20, 2026
Oracle Agile Product Lifecycle Management for Process 6.2.4 contains a remotely reachable, unauthenticated weakness that lets an attacker who first persuades a legitimate user to open a crafted link or view attacker-controlled content gain unauthorized creation, deletion, and modification of critical PLM data alongside full read access to it, with impact potentially extending into connected products because the CVSS scope is changed (base 9.3). The attacker cannot complete the chain alone - the vector requires that second user's interaction (UI:R), and availability is unaffected (A:N) - so exposure is concentrated in internet- or intranet-reachable 6.2.4 deployments whose users can be socially engineered. No public exploit code was identified and the issue is not confirmed actively exploited (not in CISA KEV) at the time of analysis, so the 9.3 severity reflects theoretical impact rather than observed attacks.
RemediationAI
Apply the fix from Oracle's October 2026 Critical Patch Update, which is the vendor's designated remediation vehicle for this CVE (https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuoct2026.html); the provided data does not specify an exact patched version or build number, so confirm the target release against the patch availability table in that advisory before upgrading, and note that Oracle CPU patches are cumulative, so applying the latest CPU also covers earlier fixes. Where immediate patching is not possible, reduce exposure with compensating controls: remove direct internet reachability from the PLM HTTP interface and require VPN or zero-trust proxy access so only known users can reach the vulnerable endpoint (side effect: remote and supplier-facing workflows need alternate access paths), and segment the PLM server from downstream connected products so the S:C scope change cannot propagate to adjacent systems. Because exploitation depends on victim interaction, tighten the human layer as well - scan and detonate inbound links and attachments targeting PLM users, and warn the Product Quality Management user base about unexpected links or content purporting to come from the PLM application. Each of these is a stopgap that leaves the underlying flaw intact, so track the CPU advisory and schedule the upgrade as the primary action.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The affected component is Product Quality Management within Oracle Agile Product Lifecycle Management for Process, a web-tier supply chain application used to manage product specifications, supplier quality records, and compliance workflows over HTTP. Oracle assigned no CWE, but the intelligence feed tags the issue as an Authentication Bypass, which aligns with the assessed vector: PR:N means the attacker needs no credentials, so the vulnerable code path is reachable before or outside the normal authorization model, and the AC:L rating indicates no special preconditions such as race windows or memory grooming. The distinguishing characteristic is the combination of UI:R with S:C - the attacker must induce a legitimate user to load attacker-controlled content, after which the resulting impact crosses a trust boundary and can reach beyond the PLM instance into additional connected products, while confidentiality and integrity are both rated High and availability is explicitly unaffected. In practice this profile fits a stored or reflected content-injection style flaw in a quality-management web surface, where an authenticated victim's session context amplifies an unauthenticated attacker's reach; because Oracle did not publish a CWE, the precise root-cause class (missing authorization check versus unsafe handling of user-supplied content) should be confirmed against the vendor advisory before assuming a specific exploitation primitive.
Know when the next one hits your stack
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Remote HTTP, low complexity, unauthenticated (PR:N) but requires victim interaction (UI:R); scope change (S:C) with high confidentiality/integrity and no availability impact, matching an injection/XSS-style flaw.
Primary rating from Vendor (oracle).
CVSS VectorVendor: oracle
DescriptionCVE.org
Vulnerability in the Oracle Agile Product Lifecycle Management for Process product of Oracle Supply Chain (component: Product Quality Management). The supported version that is affected is 6.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Agile Product Lifecycle Management for Process. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker and while the vulnerability is in Oracle Agile Product Lifecycle Management for Process, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle Agile Product Lifecycle Management for Process accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle Agile Product Lifecycle Management for Process accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 9.3 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N).
Executive ViewAI
Oracle Agile Product Lifecycle Management for Process 6.2.4 carries a critical 9.3-rated flaw that could let an attacker alter, delete, or fully read product lifecycle records after persuading a legitimate user to open crafted content, with potential spillover into connected systems because the CVSS scope is changed. Engineering, quality, and supplier-facing teams are the primary exposure point, so leadership should treat this as a product-data integrity and supply-chain trust risk rather than a routine application bug. No public exploit code or confirmed active exploitation was identified at the time of analysis, so the immediate priority is reducing exposure and preparing users while a vendor fix is unavailable.
No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations include restricting 6.2.4 deployments to trusted networks or VPN, enforcing phishing-resistant MFA, segmenting PLM servers from connected systems, applying least-privilege PLM roles, disabling link previews and auto-open content where possible, training users to report suspicious links, and monitoring for anomalous creation, deletion, or bulk modification of PLM records with integrity-checked backups ready for restoration.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.
EUVD-2026-106810
GHSA-2g88-fgc2-hmpp
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Exploit-DB