Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessReach exposed Agile PLM HTTP endpoint
-
ExploitSend crafted request to Acollect component
-
ImpactExfiltrate critical PLM data
Vulnerability Assessment
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires network reachability to the HTTP interface of an Oracle Agile PLM 2.6 deployment, specifically the Acollect component; the vector explicitly indicates no authentication (PR:N), no user interaction (UI:N), and low complexity (AC:L), so default, unhardened, network-exposed installations are directly at risk. The primary LIMITING factor is exposure scope: Agile PLM is typically an internal enterprise application, so risk is sharply higher for instances reachable from the internet or untrusted networks and much lower where access is restricted to a segmented internal network or VPN. The flaw affects confidentiality only (C:H/I:N/A:N), so it enables data disclosure, not modification or disruption. |
| Impact | This is a genuinely high-priority external-facing confidentiality flaw, though not the absolute top tier. The Oracle-supplied CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N) confirms the strongest possible exploitability profile: remote, network-reachable over HTTP, low complexity, no privileges, and no user interaction. Oracle itself rates it 'Easily exploitable.' However, the impact is bounded - C:H with I:N and A:N means pure data disclosure with no integrity or availability damage and no scope change (S:U). Several decision signals are MISSING from the input: there is no EPSS exploitation-probability score, no SSVC decision data, and no CWE provided, so automatability and technical-impact framing cannot be independently computed. CISA KEV status is not indicated (treated as NO) and no POC is referenced, so this is not confirmed active exploitation. Net: the raw exploitability is maximal and warrants prompt patching given it is unauthenticated and network-facing, but the absence of EPSS/KEV/POC signals means there is no evidence yet of widespread or active exploitation - this is a 'patch on the normal Oracle CPU cycle, prioritized for internet-exposed instances' item rather than an emergency. Note also the input tag 'Authentication Bypass' is not literally stated in the description, which describes unauthenticated access to data; the tag is plausible but not corroborated by the text. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An unauthenticated attacker with network access to an internet- or intranet-exposed Oracle Agile PLM 2.6 instance sends crafted HTTP requests to the Acollect component. Because no authentication, privileges, or user interaction are required and attack complexity is low, the attacker retrieves critical or complete Agile PLM data (product designs, BOMs, supplier and lifecycle records). No public exploit code is identified at time of analysis, so this would require independent development of the request sequence. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 21, 2026
Unauthenticated HTTP requests against the Acollect component of Oracle Agile PLM 2.6 can return critical product-lifecycle data, letting any network-positioned attacker read everything the application can access without credentials or user interaction. The impact is confidentiality-only (C:H/I:N/A:N) at CVSS 7.5, so the flaw enables bulk data disclosure rather than tampering or disruption, and exploitation becomes trivial the moment the HTTP interface is reachable. No public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis and the issue is not in CISA KEV, but with PR:N/AC:L characteristics, internet-facing or partner-exposed instances should be treated as high-priority exposure.
RemediationAI
Apply the fix published in the Oracle Critical Patch Update for October 2026 (https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuoct2026.html) to any Agile PLM 2.6 deployment running the Acollect component; patch availability is confirmed per vendor advisory but no specific patched build number is given in the available data, so confirm the target release against the CPU patch matrix before scheduling. Because the CPU bundle typically requires application downtime plus regression testing of custom extensions and integrations, plan a maintenance window and validate Acollect-dependent interfaces afterward. Where patching cannot happen immediately, the highest-value control is reducing reachability: block internet and untrusted-network access to the Agile PLM HTTP interface, and specifically to Acollect endpoints, allowing only segmented internal networks or VPN clients - the trade-off is that remote engineering, supplier, and mobile users must connect through the VPN. As a second layer, place a reverse proxy or WAF in front of Acollect and require authentication at that tier, but first inventory integrations that call Acollect without credentials, since enforcing auth there can break legacy or service-account feeds. If Acollect is not actively used, disable or unbind the component outright. Finally, enable and review web server and application logs for unauthenticated requests to Acollect paths and for unusually large or sequential data retrievals, which are the practical detection signals for this disclosure-only flaw; monitoring adds no functional risk but requires log retention and alerting capacity.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
Oracle Agile PLM is a Java-based enterprise product lifecycle management platform used to manage bills of materials, engineering change orders, and supplier/product master data; Acollect is a data-collection/aggregation component exposed through the application's HTTP interface. The supplied tags classify the issue as an Authentication Bypass, and the CVSS vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N) confirms that the Acollect endpoint processes requests without validating an authenticated session, so an attacker simply sends crafted HTTP requests and receives data normally reserved for authorized PLM users. No CWE identifier was assigned in the source data, but the observed behavior maps to the missing-authentication-for-critical-function (CWE-306) / improper access control (CWE-284) class rather than to injection or memory-safety bugs, which is consistent with the absence of any integrity or availability impact. Because the flaw sits in a web tier that frequently bridges engineering, manufacturing, and supplier networks, the blast radius of a disclosure is the full set of PLM records the service account can read.
Know when the next one hits your stack
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Oracle's own vector is supported by the description: remote unauthenticated HTTP access (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N) yielding full data disclosure with no integrity or availability impact (C:H/I:N/A:N).
Primary rating from NVD.
CVSS VectorNVD
DescriptionNVD
Vulnerability in the Oracle Agile PLM product of Oracle Supply Chain (component: Acollect). The supported version that is affected is 2.6. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Agile PLM. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle Agile PLM accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 7.5 (Confidentiality impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N).
Executive ViewAI
Oracle Agile PLM 2.6, specifically its Acollect component, exposes product-lifecycle data to unauthenticated network users, putting organizations that run internet-facing or partner-exposed instances at risk of bulk confidentiality loss. Because no credentials or user interaction are required, leadership should treat this as a high-priority exposure for intellectual property, supplier, and product data even though no public exploit has been identified at time of analysis. No vendor-released patch is identified at time of analysis, so risk must be managed through access restrictions and monitoring in the near term.
No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Restrict network access to the Acollect HTTP interface to trusted networks, disable internet or partner exposure where not essential, use firewall/ACL/WAF filtering, monitor and log unauthenticated requests to Acollect, and review access for unauthorized product-lifecycle data retrieval.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.
EUVD-2026-105971
GHSA-623f-39c3-gc6m
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Exploit-DB