Skip to main content

TranslatePress EUVDEUVD-2026-102792

| CVE-2026-107768 HIGH
Cross-site Scripting (XSS) (CWE-79)
2026-10-16 Wordfence GHSA-x3vv-jv34-q3f6
7.2
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: Wordfence
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Submit malicious comment unauthenticated
  2. Delivery
    Payload stored, rendered unsanitized
  3. Exploit
    Visitor loads translated page
  4. Execution
    Script executes in their browser
  5. Impact
    Steal session or redirect victim

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Output encoding, context-aware escaping
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Two concrete prerequisites, both stated in the description: (1) the target site must allow UNMODERATED comment submission on at least one post (note: WordPress holds first-time commenters for moderation by default, so this is typically a changed Discussion setting), and (2) the site must have a SECONDARY LANGUAGE configured in TranslatePress so the vulnerable translation-render path (class-translation-render.php) processes the comment. The injection point is the 'comment' parameter; exploitation is unauthenticated (PR:N). Limiting factors: if comments are moderated/held, if no secondary language is active, or if the site does not expose comments at all, the attack does not succeed; impact also depends on a victim subsequently viewing the injected translated page.

Impact

The signals are moderately but not alarmingly aligned. CVSS 3.1 is 7.2 (High) with vector AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N - network-reachable, low-complexity, unauthenticated (PR:N confirmed), scope-changed stored XSS with low confidentiality and integrity impact. Exploitation status is 'no public exploit identified at time of analysis' - no POC, EPSS, or KEV data was supplied, so the real-world exploitation probability cannot be quantified from the input and is effectively unknown rather than low. This is NOT a drop-everything priority: although unauthenticated and persistent, the vulnerability is gated by two deployment conditions (unmoderated comments enabled on at least one post, plus a secondary language configured). The SSVC-style read is 'exploitation: none observed; automatable: partially (comment submission is scriptable, but the unmoderated-comment prerequisite is not universal); technical impact: partial' - consistent with the High-but-not-Critical CVSS. A notable nuance: the vendor frames both prerequisites as reflecting TranslatePress's primary use case, which supports AC:L, yet WordPress does NOT auto-approve comments from first-time commenters by default, so 'unmoderated comment submission' is in practice a non-default moderation setting - verify the target's comment policy before treating this as default-config exploitable. Treat as a prioritized patch for multilingual sites with open comments, not an emergency for all installs.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

On a TranslatePress-enabled site with a secondary language and unmoderated comments, an unauthenticated attacker submits a comment containing a crafted script payload via the 'comment' parameter. Because the input is insufficiently sanitized and the output is not escaped during translation rendering, the payload is stored and executes in the browser of any visitor who later views the affected (translated) page, enabling session/cookie theft, forced redirects, or admin-context actions if an administrator views it. No public exploit code was identified in the provided data, so attacker tooling maturity is unknown.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
No patch listed yet 0.3% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 16, 2026

Stored cross-site scripting in the TranslatePress - Translate Multilingual Sites with AI Translation WordPress plugin through version 3.3.7 allows unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts via the 'comment' parameter, which then execute in the browser of any visitor who loads the affected translated page. Successful exploitation depends on two conditions that coincide with the plugin's normal use case: the site must permit unmoderated comment submission on at least one post (WordPress holds first-time commenters for moderation by default, so this usually means a modified Discussion setting), and a secondary language must be configured so that comments are processed by the plugin's translation-render code path. Wordfence rates the issue at CVSS 3.1 7.2 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N), confirming unauthenticated remote exploitation with no user interaction on the attacker's side and a scope change reflecting how stored script in a comment can act beyond the vulnerable component, and no public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis.

RemediationAI

Upstream fix available (PR/commit); released patched version not independently confirmed - the referenced changeset https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset/3744262/translatepress-multilingual/trunk/includes/class-translation-render.php shows that class-translation-render.php was corrected in trunk, so administrators should update the TranslatePress plugin as soon as a tagged release newer than 3.3.7 appears in the WordPress.org repository and confirm the installed version on each multilingual site in the meantime. Because the exploit hinges on unmoderated comments being rendered through the translation path, the most effective compensating control is to require moderation for all comments (WordPress Settings > Discussion > 'Comment must be manually approved' plus disabling 'Comment author must have a previously approved comment'), which breaks the attack chain at the cost of added moderation workload and delayed legitimate comments; alternatively, close comments on posts entirely or disable the comment form on the affected site, accepting reduced reader engagement. If the site does not genuinely need multilingual comment rendering, another option is to remove or deactivate the secondary languages configured in TranslatePress, though this sacrifices the plugin's primary function and should only be considered as a stopgap. Deploying a WAF rule that strips or blocks HTML/script tags in the comment submission body, or a Content-Security-Policy that forbids inline script, can reduce execution of stored payloads but is bypassable and should be treated as Defense in Depth rather than a fix; any of these measures should be paired with the plugin update once the patched release is available.

Affected VersionsENISA

TranslatePress – Translate Multilingual sites with AI Translation 0 ≤3.3.7

Affected Packages

euvd translatepress_translate_multilingual_sites_with_ai_translation no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The flaw is a classic CWE-79 improper-neutralization-of-input-during-web-page-generation (stored XSS) in the WordPress plugin cozmoslabs:translatepress_-_translate_multilingual_sites_with_ai_translation (CPE cpe:2.3:a:cozmoslabs:translatepress_-_translate_multilingual_sites_with_ai_translation:*). TranslatePress integrates with WordPress's comment system and re-renders comment output when displaying a translated version of a page; the vulnerable logic lives in includes/class-translation-render.php (relevant code at lines 835, 1355 and 1655 in the 3.3.7 tag), where the 'comment' parameter is processed without sufficient sanitization on input or escaping on output. Because the injected payload is stored in the WordPress database through normal comment submission and later echoed inside the translated page's HTML, the script executes in the security context of the site's origin whenever a victim views that page - the reason the CVSS vector carries S:C (scope change) alongside PR:N and UI:N. The prerequisites are structural rather than exotic: WordPress by default holds first-time commenters in moderation, so the attacker needs a post whose Discussion settings allow unmoderated comments, and TranslatePress must have at least one additional language configured so comments traverse the affected translation-render path; absent either condition (or if the site exposes no comments at all), the injected markup is never rendered in the vulnerable context. The upstream changeset 3744262 modifies the same class-translation-render.php file, indicating that sanitization/escaping of the comment output was the fix area.

Know when Wordpress Plugin gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (Wordfence) PRIMARY 7.2 HIGH
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
vuln.today AI 7.2 HIGH

Unauthenticated comment submission (PR:N) over the network; stored payload executes in other users' browsers (S:C, C:L/I:L, A:N); AC:L accepted per vendor framing though unmoderated-comment config is a real-world gating factor.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (Wordfence).

CVSS VectorVendor: Wordfence

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

DescriptionCVE.org

The TranslatePress - Translate Multilingual sites with AI Translation plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the 'comment' parameter in all versions up to, and including, 3.3.7 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. Exploitation requires the target site to allow unmoderated comment submission on at least one post and to have a secondary language configured - both conditions reflect TranslatePress's primary use case.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

A stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in the TranslatePress - Translate Multilingual Sites with AI Translation WordPress plugin (through version 3.3.7) lets unauthenticated attackers embed malicious scripts in comment fields that then run in the browsers of every visitor who views an affected translated page, and no vendor-released patch has been identified at time of analysis. Because the attack requires no credentials and no action by the victim, any public-facing site running the plugin with open commenting and a secondary language configured could silently expose customers, prospects, and staff to session theft, credential compromise, or fraudulent content served under the organization's brand. Leadership should treat this as a reputation and trust risk that cannot be closed by patching today, and instead requires immediate configuration hardening and monitoring.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis, so mitigate through configuration and virtual patching: enforce manual approval for all comments and disable unmoderated or anonymous comment submission site-wide; disable commenting where not business-critical; deactivate the plugin if a secondary language is not needed; deploy WAF rules to block script payloads in comment fields; scan the wp_comments table for injected scripts and remove them; and monitor web and database logs for evidence of stored script injection until a fixed TranslatePress version is released.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.3%
Top 79% exploitable
Prevalence
Medium
popular WordPress multilingual plugin, but multilingual sites are a subset
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.3%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

36
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +36
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Cross-Site Scripting occurs when an application accepts untrusted data and sends it to a web browser without proper validation or encoding.

CVE-2023-6553 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Dec 15

The Backup Migration plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Remote Code Execution in all versions up to, and including, 1

CVE-2024-5084 CRITICAL POC
9.8 May 23

The Hash Form - Drag & Drop Form Builder plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary file uploads due to missing fil

CVE-2024-44000 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Oct 20

Authentication bypass in the LiteSpeed Cache WordPress plugin (versions prior to 6.5.0.1) allows unauthenticated remote

CVE-2020-36847 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jul 12

The Simple File List plugin for WordPress through version 4.2.2 contains an unauthenticated remote code execution vulner

CVE-2025-27007 CRITICAL POC
9.8 May 01

The SureTriggers WordPress plugin through version 1.0.82 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows unaut

CVE-2016-1209 CRITICAL POC
9.8 May 14

The Ninja Forms plugin before 2.9.42.1 for WordPress allows remote attackers to conduct PHP object injection attacks via

CVE-2024-4443 CRITICAL POC
9.8 May 22

The Business Directory Plugin - Easy Listing Directories for WordPress plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to time-based

CVE-2024-1698 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Feb 27

SQL injection in the NotificationX WordPress plugin (versions up to and including 2.8.2) allows unauthenticated remote a

CVE-2023-6875 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jan 11

The POST SMTP Mailer - Email log, Delivery Failure Notifications and Best Mail SMTP for WordPress plugin for WordPress i

CVE-2024-1512 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Feb 17

The MasterStudy LMS WordPress Plugin - for Online Courses and Education plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to union base

CVE-2024-4295 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jun 05

The Email Subscribers by Icegram Express plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to SQL Injection via the ‘hash’ parameter in

CVE-2024-50498 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Oct 28

Remote code execution in the WP Query Console WordPress plugin (versions up to and including 1.0) by Ajit Bohra allows u

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy