Skip to main content

Groundhogg EUVDEUVD-2026-101843

| CVE-2026-18548 HIGH
Cross-site Scripting (XSS) (CWE-79)
2026-10-15 Wordfence GHSA-x57v-8jrr-596c
7.2
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: Wordfence
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Craft malicious 'ref' parameter payload
  2. Delivery
    Trigger tracked visit storing path as activity
  3. Exploit
    Admin opens contact activity timeline
  4. Execution
    Unescaped path executes script in admin browser
  5. Impact
    Hijack admin session or inject content

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Output encoding, context-aware escaping
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires that Groundhogg's link/visit activity tracking be in use so that an attacker-supplied 'ref' path value gets stored against a contact, and then requires a logged-in Groundhogg user/administrator to open that contact's record and view its activity timeline in the wp-admin contact editor, where the stored path is rendered without escaping (fixed by escHTML() in 4.5.15). The injection itself needs no authentication, but the payload only executes in the browser of the staff member who later views the affected contact - so the practical limiting factors are (1) the site actively using contact/activity tracking and (2) an operator viewing the malicious contact; it does not fire against anonymous front-end visitors.

Impact

This is a moderate-priority issue rather than a top-tier emergency. The Wordfence-assigned CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N, 7.2 High) describes network-reachable, low-complexity, unauthenticated injection with a scope change and Low confidentiality/integrity impact - consistent with a stored XSS that fires in an administrator's browser session. No EPSS score, no CISA KEV listing, and no public POC were supplied, so there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and no evidence of active exploitation; the risk is theoretical-but-credible, not observed. Note a signal conflict: the vector asserts UI:N, yet the description states the script 'executes whenever a user accesses an injected page,' which implies a victim (most plausibly a logged-in Groundhogg operator viewing a contact's activity timeline) must open the affected view - so real-world triggering does require victim action even though UI:N suggests otherwise; verify the interaction model with the vendor. The source commit shows the unescaped sink is the contact-editor activity path rendered in wp-admin, meaning successful exploitation lands in an authenticated admin context and could realistically be chained to session/nonce theft or rogue-admin creation, which would push practical integrity impact above the Low rating assigned. A fix exists (4.5.15), which lowers urgency for patched sites.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An unauthenticated attacker crafts a malicious 'ref' value (a tracked link/visit path) containing a script payload, which Groundhogg stores as contact activity data. Later, when a logged-in administrator or operator opens that contact's activity timeline in the WordPress admin contact editor, the unescaped path is rendered and the injected script executes in the admin's authenticated browser session. No public exploit code was identified in the provided data, but the patch commit (escHTML added in 4.5.15) confirms the vulnerable sink.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
No patch listed yet 0.3% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 15, 2026

Stored cross-site scripting in the Groundhogg CRM, Newsletters, and Marketing Automation WordPress plugin (all versions up to and including 4.5.14) lets unauthenticated attackers inject arbitrary JavaScript through the 'ref' parameter, which is persisted as contact activity data and later rendered without escaping in the wp-admin contact editor. The script only executes in the browser of a logged-in staff member or administrator who opens the affected contact and views its activity timeline, so successful exploitation requires both the site to be actively using Groundhogg's link/visit activity tracking and an operator to view the poisoned record; the injection itself needs no authentication. This is a moderate-priority issue rather than a top-tier emergency, and at time of analysis there is no public exploit identified, no confirmed active exploitation (CISA KEV), and a vendor fix is available in version 4.5.15.

RemediationAI

Vendor-released patch: upgrade Groundhogg to version 4.5.15 or later, which adds escHTML() escaping around the stored activity path in assets/js/admin/contacts/contact-editor.js and its minified counterpart (upstream commit 8a6fe60e751e, patched tag https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/groundhogg/tags/4.5.15/assets/js/admin/contacts/contact-editor.js#L848; vendor advisory https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/791ee926-edd9-4615-9a46-1d8836938fd9?source=cve). Update through the WordPress plugin dashboard or with wp-cli ('wp plugin update groundhogg --version=4.5.15'), then confirm the deployed contact-editor.js contains the escHTML() call rather than raw interpolation, and clear any caching/minification layer that may still serve the old bundle. If an immediate update is not possible, disable Groundhogg's link/visit activity tracking so attacker-controlled 'ref' values are never stored and therefore never rendered - the trade-off is loss of click and visit analytics for contacts; alternatively, restrict wp-admin access to the Groundhogg contacts and activity screens to trusted staff, which reduces but does not eliminate the risk since any privileged viewer remains a viable trigger, and consider filtering or sanitizing incoming 'ref' values to reject markup characters. Because the payload executes only when an operator opens the poisoned contact record, reviewing and deleting suspicious contact activity entries and scanning existing contacts for injected markup is a useful containment step, but the escaping fix itself must be applied to close the issue.

Affected VersionsENISA

Groundhogg — CRM, Newsletters, and Marketing Automation 0 ≤4.5.14

Affected Packages

euvd groundhogg_crm_newsletters_and_marketing_automation no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The flaw is CWE-79 (improper neutralization of input during web page generation, i.e. cross-site scripting) in an administrative user-interface rendering path rather than a front-end page. Groundhogg records link/visit activity for contacts, storing the attacker-supplied 'ref' value as activity.data.path. The plugin's admin JavaScript (assets/js/admin/contacts/contact-editor.js, around line 848, and the corresponding minified bundle) interpolates that stored path directly into an HTML anchor string using a JavaScript template literal without encoding, so a crafted 'ref' value is parsed as markup and script when the contact's activity timeline is displayed. The upstream fix (commit 8a6fe60e751e) wraps the value in the plugin's escHTML() helper in both the source and minified files, neutralizing the injection at render time. The assessed CVSS:3.1 vector AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N reflects unauthenticated network injection (PR:N) but a required victim interaction (UI:R - a staff member must open the malicious contact record) and a scope change (S:C) because code can execute in the privileged wp-admin origin with that user's session. The CPE record identifies the affected package family as cpe:2.3:a:trainingbusinesspros:groundhogg_-_crm,_newsletters,_and_marketing_automation, the WordPress.org vendor namespace for the plugin.

Know when Wordpress Plugin gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (Wordfence) PRIMARY 7.2 HIGH
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
vuln.today AI 6.1 MEDIUM

Injection is unauthenticated and network-borne (PR:N/AV:N/AC:L), but payload executes only when an admin opens the contact activity view, so UI:R; XSS in a different context gives S:C with Low C/I and no availability impact.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (Wordfence).

CVSS VectorVendor: Wordfence

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

DescriptionCVE.org

The Groundhogg - CRM, Newsletters, and Marketing Automation plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the 'ref' parameter in all versions up to, and including, 4.5.14 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

The Groundhogg CRM, Newsletters, and Marketing Automation plugin for WordPress - used by marketing and sales teams to manage customer contact records and campaign tracking - is affected in all versions up to and including 4.5.14 by a stored cross-site scripting flaw that lets injected JavaScript run inside the browser of logged-in staff and administrators when they open a poisoned contact record. Successful exploitation requires the site to be actively using Groundhogg's link and visit activity tracking and a staff member to view the affected contact timeline, so the practical risk is targeted rather than opportunistic; however, any resulting admin-session compromise could expose contact data, customer communications, and administrative control of the WordPress site. Leadership should treat this as a moderate-priority remediation item with a known fix, not an emergency, given there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.3%
Top 80% exploitable
Prevalence
Medium
popular WordPress CRM/marketing plugin, tens of thousands of active installs
Social Media
1
Sightings
Data Quality
6 sources
Confidence: High

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.3%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
Yes
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

36
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +36
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Cross-Site Scripting occurs when an application accepts untrusted data and sends it to a web browser without proper validation or encoding.

CVE-2023-6553 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Dec 15

The Backup Migration plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Remote Code Execution in all versions up to, and including, 1

CVE-2024-5084 CRITICAL POC
9.8 May 23

The Hash Form - Drag & Drop Form Builder plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary file uploads due to missing fil

CVE-2024-44000 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Oct 20

Authentication bypass in the LiteSpeed Cache WordPress plugin (versions prior to 6.5.0.1) allows unauthenticated remote

CVE-2020-36847 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jul 12

The Simple File List plugin for WordPress through version 4.2.2 contains an unauthenticated remote code execution vulner

CVE-2025-27007 CRITICAL POC
9.8 May 01

The SureTriggers WordPress plugin through version 1.0.82 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows unaut

CVE-2016-1209 CRITICAL POC
9.8 May 14

The Ninja Forms plugin before 2.9.42.1 for WordPress allows remote attackers to conduct PHP object injection attacks via

CVE-2024-4443 CRITICAL POC
9.8 May 22

The Business Directory Plugin - Easy Listing Directories for WordPress plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to time-based

CVE-2024-1698 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Feb 27

SQL injection in the NotificationX WordPress plugin (versions up to and including 2.8.2) allows unauthenticated remote a

CVE-2023-6875 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jan 11

The POST SMTP Mailer - Email log, Delivery Failure Notifications and Best Mail SMTP for WordPress plugin for WordPress i

CVE-2024-1512 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Feb 17

The MasterStudy LMS WordPress Plugin - for Online Courses and Education plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to union base

CVE-2024-4295 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jun 05

The Email Subscribers by Icegram Express plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to SQL Injection via the ‘hash’ parameter in

CVE-2024-50498 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Oct 28

Remote code execution in the WP Query Console WordPress plugin (versions up to and including 1.0) by Ajit Bohra allows u

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy