Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessObtain low-privileged access to one Liberty server
-
ExploitAbuse insufficient inter-server isolation
-
ExecutionCross isolation boundary to co-located server
-
ImpactRead and modify neighboring server data
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V8 - Authorization Access control enforcement
MITRE ATT&CK
1 technique across 1 tactic: Defense Evasion The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Requires a WebSphere Liberty deployment where multiple server instances share a single installation (a shared/consolidated install topology), and the attacker must already possess low-level privileges (PR:L) on at least one of those co-located servers. The isolation weakness then allows crossing into other servers sharing that install. Limiting factors: exploitation does not apply to single-server or properly segregated installs; AC:H signals that specific shared-install conditions must exist; and the attacker needs a pre-existing authenticated foothold on one server, so this is not remote-unauthenticated against default standalone deployments. Affected only in versions 17.0.0.3 through 26.0.0.10. |
| Impact | This is a genuine but conditional priority rather than a mass-exploitation threat. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N, base 8.2 High) reflects high confidentiality and integrity impact with a scope change, which correctly captures the cross-server nature of the flaw - an attacker breaching isolation affects servers beyond the one they initially control. However, two metrics meaningfully temper real-world risk: AC:H (high attack complexity, indicating conditions outside the attacker's control such as a specific shared-install topology) and PR:L (the attacker must already hold low-level privileges on one server in the shared install). No EPSS score, KEV listing, or public POC is present in the provided data, so there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and no evidence of active exploitation. The 'Authentication Bypass' tag conflicts with the actual nature of the issue - the CWE is CWE-284 (Improper Access Control) and the description describes isolation failure between co-tenant servers, not bypass of an authentication mechanism; treat the tag as loose labeling and verify with IBM advisory node/7292226. Net: a real, high-severity cross-tenant access-control weakness worth prioritizing in multi-server shared-install deployments, but the PR:L + AC:H preconditions make indiscriminate internet-wide exploitation unlikely. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | In a shared WebSphere Liberty installation hosting multiple server instances (e.g., a multi-tenant or consolidated hosting setup), a low-privileged actor who controls one Liberty server abuses the insufficient isolation to reach resources belonging to a co-located server sharing the same install. Because scope changes (S:C), the attacker can read and modify data or configuration of the neighboring server beyond their original authorization boundary. No public exploit code is identified at time of analysis, and the high attack complexity (AC:H) means specific shared-install conditions must be met. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 13, 2026
Insufficient isolation in WebSphere Liberty 17.0.0.3 through 26.0.0.10 allows an authenticated attacker who already has low-level privileges on one server instance to cross into other server instances that share the same installation, yielding high confidentiality and integrity impact with a changed scope (CVSS 8.2). Exploitation is conditional: it requires a shared or consolidated install topology and a pre-existing foothold on a co-located server, and the assessment rates this as a genuine but conditional priority rather than a mass-exploitation threat. No public exploit identified at time of analysis.
RemediationAI
No vendor-released patch was identified in the provided data; consult the IBM support page at https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7292226 for the latest fix or interim fix applicable to the affected Liberty release. Because the flaw is an isolation weakness, the most direct mitigation is to stop sharing a single installation among server instances: deploy each server under its own Liberty installation, or use container/OS-level isolation so that one server's runtime user cannot access another's files, configuration, or resources. Where a shared install must remain, restrict filesystem permissions and run each server under distinct OS accounts with least privilege, but this may break shared administrative tasks and requires careful testing. Apply least privilege to authenticated users on each server, monitor for cross-server access attempts, and upgrade to a fixed Liberty version as soon as IBM makes one available; note that separate installs increase management and disk overhead.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
WebSphere Liberty is IBM's lightweight Java/Jakarta EE application server runtime. The vulnerability stems from CWE-284 Improper Access Control: multiple server instances deployed under a single Liberty installation do not maintain sufficient isolation, so an attacker who has already obtained low privileges on one server can potentially access or affect another server's resources, configuration, or applications. The CVSS vector CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N indicates network-reachable access, high attack complexity due to the required shared-install deployment, authenticated low-privilege access, no user interaction, changed scope, and high confidentiality/integrity impact but no availability impact. The EUVD lists the affected range as WebSphere Application Server - Liberty 17.0.0.3 through 26.0.0.10; the IBM advisory is at https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7292226.
Know when the next one hits your stack
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Attacker needs a low-priv foothold on one co-located server (PR:L) and a specific shared-install topology (AC:H); scope changes to neighboring servers (S:C) with high C/I impact and no availability loss.
Primary rating from Vendor (us).
CVSS VectorVendor: us
DescriptionCVE.org
IBM WebSphere Application Server - Liberty 17.0.0.3 through 26.0.0.10 has insufficient isolation between servers sharing an install.
Executive ViewAI
IBM WebSphere Liberty deployments that run multiple server instances from a single shared installation are exposed to a cross-instance isolation flaw (CVE-2026-105443) that could let an attacker with an existing low-privilege foothold on one instance reach data and modify configuration in neighboring instances on the same host. This matters most to organizations that consolidated Liberty workloads onto shared installs to cut costs, because a single compromised or misconfigured application could become a stepping stone into unrelated business services hosted alongside it - breaking the application-level boundary that teams rely on for segregation of duties and data protection. No vendor patch is currently available, so the exposure persists until either IBM ships a fix or the consolidated topology is redesigned.
No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations: eliminate shared/consolidated Liberty installations by giving each server instance its own installation directory, or isolate instances through separate service accounts, containers, or hosts; restrict filesystem permissions so one instance cannot read or write another's configuration and data; apply network segmentation and least-privilege access reviews on affected hosts; monitor and alert on cross-instance file access, Liberty configuration changes, and lateral movement between co-located instances.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.
EUVD-2026-100492
GHSA-h2rr-h6w6-w29v
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB