CWE-917

{7*7} which the server evaluates to 49. No public exploit identified at time of analysis and the issue is not listed in CISA KEV.

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an Expression Language Statement ('Expression Language Injection') vulnerability in Apache OFBiz. This issue affects Apache OFBiz: before 24.09.06. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 24.09.06, which fixes the issue.

Remote code execution in Offline Hospital Management System 5.3.0 stems from an insecure Electron renderer configuration where Node.js integration is enabled while context isolation is disabled, allowing JavaScript in the renderer to invoke Node.js APIs and run arbitrary OS commands. The flaw carries a CVSS 7.3 with network attack vector and no privileges required, though EPSS is low at 0.06% and no public exploit identified at time of analysis beyond a Medium write-up describing the technique.

Expression language injection in Beetl template engine versions up to 3.20.2 enables remote attackers to execute arbitrary expressions through the SpELFunction component. The vulnerability stems from improper neutralization of special elements in Spring Expression Language (SpEL) processing, with publicly available exploit code and no vendor response despite early notification. CVSS 7.3 indicates moderate severity with confirmed remote exploitability.

Filter-expression injection in Spring AI's MilvusVectorStore allows remote unauthenticated attackers to manipulate vector database queries by injecting malicious filter expressions through unsanitized document IDs. Affects Spring AI 1.0.0-1.0.6 and 1.1.0-1.1.5. VMware has released patches in versions 1.0.7 and 1.1.6. CVSS 8.6 (High) with network attack vector and no privileges required. No active exploitation confirmed (not in CISA KEV) and no public POC identified at time of analysis.

Remote code execution in OmniFaces CDNResourceHandler allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary code on servers via crafted EL injection in resource URLs. The vulnerability affects applications using wildcard CDN mappings (e.g., libraryName:*=https://cdn.example.com/*), where attackers can embed Expression Language expressions in resource request names that get evaluated server-side. Patched versions available across all maintained branches (1.14.2, 2.7.32, 3.14.16, 4.7.5, 5.2.3). EPSS data unavailable; not currently in CISA KEV, suggesting limited active exploitation at time of analysis.

Server-Side Template Injection (SSTI) in Thymeleaf 3.1.4.RELEASE and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via specially crafted expressions that bypass the template engine's sandbox restrictions. Applications passing unsanitized user input to sandboxed template contexts are vulnerable to full server compromise. Vendor-released patch is available in version 3.1.5.RELEASE. The CVSS 9.0 CRITICAL rating reflects the potential for remote code execution with high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact, though the AC:H (high attack complexity) indicates exploitation requires specific application patterns where user input flows directly into sandboxed template contexts without validation.

CEL injection in Apache Polaris 1.4.0 allows authenticated users to escape credential access boundaries on Google Cloud Storage. Attackers can craft namespace or table identifiers containing single quotes and CEL fragments to break out of quoted strings in Credential Access Boundary conditions, escalating temporary table-scoped GCS credentials to effectively bucket-wide access. Confirmed in private testing: attackers obtained credentials intended for one table but successfully listed, read, created, and deleted objects across unrelated tables and external prefixes within the entire configured bucket. EPSS data not yet available for this recent CVE; CVSS 9.4 reflects critical confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact across both vulnerable and subsequent systems (scope changed).

A security bypass vulnerability exists in the expression execution mechanisms of Thymeleaf up to and including 3.1.3.RELEASE. Although the library provides mechanisms to prevent expression injection, it fails to properly neutralize specific syntax patterns that allow for the execution of unauthorized expressions. If an application developer passes unvalidated user input directly to the template engine, an unauthenticated remote attacker can bypass the library's protections to achieve Server-Side Template Injection (SSTI). This has been fixed in Thymeleaf 3.1.4.RELEASE. No workaround is available beyond ensuring applications do not pass unvalidated user input directly to the template engine. Upgrading to 3.1.4.RELEASE is strongly recommended in any case. Thanks to Dawid Bakaj (VIPentest.com) for responsible disclosure.

A security bypass vulnerability exists in the expression execution mechanisms of Thymeleaf up to and including 3.1.3.RELEASE. Although the library provides mechanisms to prevent expression injection, it fails to properly restrict the scope of accessible objects, allowing specific potentially sensitive objects to be reached from within a template. If an application developer passes unvalidated user input directly to the template engine, an unauthenticated remote attacker can bypass the library's protections to achieve Server-Side Template Injection (SSTI). This has been fixed in Thymeleaf 3.1.4.RELEASE. No workaround is available beyond ensuring applications do not pass unvalidated user input directly to the template engine. Upgrading to 3.1.4.RELEASE is strongly recommended in any case. Thanks to Thomas Reburn (Praetorian) for responsible disclosure.