Skip to main content

Polylang CVE-2026-97279

| EUVDEUVD-2026-89924 MEDIUM
Cross-site Scripting (XSS) (CWE-79)
2026-09-30 Patchstack GHSA-2724-v6vq-383j
6.5
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: Patchstack
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain Contributor account
  2. Delivery
    Submit payload into unsanitized Polylang field
  3. Exploit
    Store malicious script
  4. Execution
    Admin/editor views content
  5. Impact
    Script runs in victim's authenticated session

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Output encoding, context-aware escaping
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Requires an authenticated WordPress account with at least Contributor privileges on a site running Polylang <= 3.8.9 (PR:L). Exploitation is not automatic: a higher-privileged victim (e.g., editor/administrator) must view the attacker-supplied content for the script to fire (UI:R). These two factors - a pre-existing trusted account plus required victim interaction - are the primary limiters and make mass, unauthenticated exploitation infeasible. No special non-default plugin configuration is indicated in the advisory.

Impact

This is a moderate-severity, low-real-risk issue rather than an urgent priority. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L, base 6.5) describes a network-reachable but authenticated (PR:L) stored/contributor XSS that additionally requires victim interaction (UI:R). The scope change (S:C) - script executing in the context of another user/admin browser session - is what lifts an otherwise low-impact bug (C:L/I:L/A:L) into the medium band. No EPSS score, no CISA KEV listing, and no public POC were provided, so all exploitation signals point to 'no public exploit identified at time of analysis.' The requirement for a valid Contributor account (a non-trivial trust level) plus a victim clicking/viewing the malicious content substantially limits practical, at-scale exploitation. There are no conflicting signals in the data; the CVSS vector is internally consistent with a contributor-authored XSS. Net: track and patch on a normal cadence, not an emergency.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who has obtained (or been granted) a WordPress Contributor account on a site running Polylang <= 3.8.9 submits content or plugin input containing a malicious script payload that is not properly sanitized. When a higher-privileged user such as an editor or administrator later views that content in the dashboard, the script executes in their authenticated browser session (scope change), enabling session/action abuse. No public proof-of-concept was provided in the intelligence.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
No patch listed yet 0.2% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Sep 30, 2026

Stored cross-site scripting (XSS) in the Polylang WordPress plugin (versions up to and including 3.8.9) allows authenticated attackers with Contributor-level access to inject malicious scripts that execute when a higher-privileged user views the crafted content. Exploitation requires victim interaction, such as viewing a page or post, and no public exploit code or active exploitation has been identified at time of analysis. The CVSS score is 6.5 (moderate), and the risk is assessed as low due to the requirement for a trusted account and user interaction.

RemediationAI

As of the time of analysis, no specific patched version is identified in the available data. Site administrators should monitor the vendor's Patchstack advisory (https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/polylang/vulnerability/wordpress-polylang-plugin-3-8-9-cross-site-scripting-xss-vulnerability?_s_id=cve) for a patch and update Polylang to the latest version once a fix is released. In the interim, consider reducing the number of users with Contributor or higher privileges, as the vulnerability requires such an account to exploit; however, this may impact content workflows. Alternatively, deploy a web application firewall (WAF) with XSS filtering rules to block malicious payloads, though WAFs may not detect all obfuscated attacks. Disabling the Polylang plugin is a definitive workaround but will remove multilingual functionality.

Affected VersionsENISA

Polylang n/a ≤3.8.9

Affected Packages

euvd polylang no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The vulnerability is a CWE-79 improper neutralization of input during web page generation, commonly known as cross-site scripting (XSS), in the Polylang plugin for WordPress. Polylang is a popular plugin for creating multilingual websites, allowing content to be translated and managed in multiple languages. The affected component is identified by CPE cpe:2.3:a:chouby:polylang:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*, indicating that all versions up to and including 3.8.9 are vulnerable. The XSS arises because the plugin fails to properly sanitize or escape user-supplied input, likely in a field accessible to users with Contributor roles, such as translation strings or post metadata. When a higher-privileged user (e.g., editor or administrator) views the injected content, the script executes in their browser, potentially leading to session hijacking, data theft, or privilege escalation. The CVSS vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L) confirms that the attack is network-accessible, requires low privileges (Contributor), and requires user interaction from a victim.

Know when Polylang gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (Patchstack) PRIMARY 6.5 MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
vuln.today AI 6.5 MEDIUM

Network-reachable contributor-authored XSS needs a low-privilege account (PR:L) and victim view (UI:R); script runs cross-context (S:C) with limited C/I/A impact.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (Patchstack).

CVSS VectorVendor: Patchstack

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

DescriptionCVE.org

Contributor Cross Site Scripting (XSS) in Polylang <= 3.8.9 versions.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.2%
Top 88% exploitable
Prevalence
Medium
one of the most popular WordPress multilingual plugins, ~700k+ installs
Data Quality
3 sources
Confidence: Low

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.2%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact· derived
Medium
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

32
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +32
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Cross-Site Scripting occurs when an application accepts untrusted data and sends it to a web browser without proper validation or encoding.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy