Skip to main content

PO/MO Editor CVE-2026-97020

| EUVDEUVD-2026-100791 MEDIUM
Cross-site Scripting (XSS) (CWE-79)
2026-10-14 Wordfence GHSA-5c2x-59qc-4m85
6.4
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: Wordfence
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Authenticate as subscriber-level user
  2. Delivery
    Submit crafted 'podata' parameter
  3. Exploit
    Store malicious .po/.mo translation file
  4. Execution
    load_textdomain_mofile serves poisoned strings
  5. Impact
    Script executes in victim browser

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Output encoding, context-aware escaping
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Requires the PO/MO Editor plugin (≤1.4.2) installed and active, plus a valid authenticated account with subscriber-level capability or higher (CVSS PR:L) - realistic on sites with open user registration enabled. Exploitation occurs through the 'podata' parameter, which lacks input sanitization and output escaping; the stored payload is injected as a replacement .po/.mo translation file and executed via the plugin's load_textdomain_mofile filter when any user renders an affected page. Limiting factors: an attacker must first obtain a low-privilege account (not anonymous/unauthenticated), the vulnerable plugin must be present, and impact (C:L/I:L, no availability effect) is bounded to script execution in victim browsers rather than direct server compromise.

Impact

This is a medium-severity stored XSS (CVSS 6.4, CWE-79) reported by Wordfence, a credible WordPress-vulnerability source. The provided CVSS vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N) indicates network-reachable, low-complexity exploitation requiring only low privileges (PR:L) and no user interaction to inject, with a scope change (S:C) reflecting that the stored payload executes in other users' browser contexts. No EPSS score, CISA KEV listing, or public POC was provided in the input, so exploitation probability and real-world activity cannot be quantified from available signals - exploitation status is therefore 'no public exploit identified at time of analysis.' The signals are internally consistent and not conflicting: a genuinely low-barrier flaw (subscriber-level accounts are common on open-registration WordPress sites) but with only Low confidentiality/integrity impact and no availability impact. The notable technical twist - the payload is served as a replacement core translation file via the plugin's own load_textdomain_mofile filter - broadens blast radius because poisoned strings render across arbitrary pages, which supports the S:C scope rating. Overall this is a real but moderate priority: prioritize where the PO/MO Editor plugin is installed and user self-registration is enabled; deprioritize on locked-down single-admin sites where no low-privilege accounts exist. Absence of KEV/EPSS/POC here means lack of evidence, not evidence of low risk - verify against a live feed before final triage.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker registers or obtains a subscriber-level account on a WordPress site running PO/MO Editor ≤1.4.2 and submits a crafted 'podata' parameter containing a malicious translation entry. The plugin stores this as a .po/.mo file and, via its load_textdomain_mofile filter, serves the attacker-controlled translation in place of legitimate core strings, so the injected script executes in the browser of any user - including an administrator - who subsequently loads an affected page. No public exploit code was identified in the provided data, and no user interaction is required to plant the payload.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
No patch listed yet 0.3% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 14, 2026

Stored cross-site scripting in the PO/MO Editor WordPress plugin, affecting all versions up to and including 1.4.2, allows an authenticated attacker with subscriber-level access or higher to inject arbitrary script through the 'podata' parameter, which the plugin persists and later serves as a replacement .po/.mo translation file via its load_textdomain_mofile filter. Because the injected translation is rendered for any visitor loading an affected page, a low-privilege account on a site with open registration enabled is sufficient to seed persistent script execution in other users' browsers; the CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N, score 6.4) reflects network reachability, no user interaction beyond page view, scope change, and limited confidentiality and integrity impact with no availability effect. Exploitation requires the plugin to be installed and active plus a valid low-privilege account, and no public exploit code or confirmed active exploitation (CISA KEV) was identified at time of analysis.

RemediationAI

No vendor-released patch or fixed version is identified in the available data, so the definitive references remain the Wordfence advisory (https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/a06e1a22-f660-401b-bfbf-0064a9220c26?source=cve) and the plugin Trac source links for class-pomoeditor-manager.php and class-pomoeditor-system.php, which should be re-checked for a released fix before upgrading. Until a patched release is confirmed, the most reliable mitigation is to deactivate and remove the PO/MO Editor plugin entirely if its translation-editing functionality is not required, accepting the loss of that feature; simply deactivating without cleanup leaves attacker-written .po/.mo files in place, so audit the WordPress uploads and translation directories for unexpected or recently modified catalog files and delete any that cannot be attributed to legitimate translation work. Because exploitation requires an authenticated subscriber-level account (CVSS PR:L), reduce the attack surface by disabling open user registration if it is not needed, tightening default roles, and auditing existing low-privilege accounts for suspicious activity - these measures lower the likelihood of an attacker obtaining the required foothold but do not remediate the underlying flaw, and they can break legitimate multi-author or membership workflows. A virtual patch or WAF rule that blocks or sanitizes the 'podata' parameter on requests to plugin endpoints offers interim protection with the trade-off of possible false positives against legitimate translation saves, and because the payload is stored it will not remove scripts already persisted. Finally, treat any injected translation catalog as compromised content and review site pages and user sessions for evidence of script delivery.

Affected VersionsENISA

PO/MO Editor 0 ≤1.4.2

Affected Packages

euvd po_mo_editor no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The root cause is CWE-79, improper neutralization of input during web page generation, in a WordPress i18n utility plugin that manages gettext .po/.mo translation catalogs. WordPress loads translation catalogs through the load_textdomain_mofile filter, and PO/MO Editor hooks that filter to substitute its own stored translation file; per the referenced source in class-pomoeditor-manager.php (lines 41, 110, 115 and 177) and class-pomoeditor-system.php (line 78), the 'podata' parameter is written without adequate input sanitization and later emitted without output escaping. The result is not a conventional reflected/stored content XSS but a translation-poisoning variant: attacker-controlled strings are written into a .mo file that WordPress then treats as authoritative translation data and renders in place of the original core strings. The CVSS scope-change (S:C) designation is consistent with this, since script executes in the context of pages and components beyond the vulnerable plugin itself. The affected package is identified by CPE cpe:2.3:a:dougwollison:po/mo_editor:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* (vendor dougwollison), mirrored in ENISA EUVD record EUVD-2026-100791, which lists the affected range as PO/MO Editor 0 through 1.4.2. The vulnerability was reported by Wordfence, a credible WordPress-focused vulnerability source.

Know when Wordpress Plugin gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (Wordfence) PRIMARY 6.4 MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
vuln.today AI 6.4 MEDIUM

Network-reachable plugin endpoint (AV:N/AC:L), requires a low-privilege subscriber account (PR:L), stored payload needs no interaction to plant (UI:N), and executes in other users' contexts affecting rendered pages site-wide (S:C) with limited C/I impact.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (Wordfence).

CVSS VectorVendor: Wordfence

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

DescriptionCVE.org

The PO/MO Editor plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the 'podata' parameter in all versions up to, and including, 1.4.2 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with subscriber-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. The injected payload is loaded as a replacement .po/.mo translation file via the plugin's own load_textdomain_mofile filter, causing WordPress to serve the attacker-written translation in place of the original core strings.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.3%
Top 83% exploitable
Prevalence
Low
niche translation-file editor plugin, modest WordPress install base
Data Quality
4 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.3%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact· derived
Medium
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

32
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +32
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Cross-Site Scripting occurs when an application accepts untrusted data and sends it to a web browser without proper validation or encoding.

CVE-2023-6553 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Dec 15

The Backup Migration plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Remote Code Execution in all versions up to, and including, 1

CVE-2024-5084 CRITICAL POC
9.8 May 23

The Hash Form - Drag & Drop Form Builder plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary file uploads due to missing fil

CVE-2024-44000 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Oct 20

Authentication bypass in the LiteSpeed Cache WordPress plugin (versions prior to 6.5.0.1) allows unauthenticated remote

CVE-2020-36847 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jul 12

The Simple File List plugin for WordPress through version 4.2.2 contains an unauthenticated remote code execution vulner

CVE-2025-27007 CRITICAL POC
9.8 May 01

The SureTriggers WordPress plugin through version 1.0.82 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows unaut

CVE-2016-1209 CRITICAL POC
9.8 May 14

The Ninja Forms plugin before 2.9.42.1 for WordPress allows remote attackers to conduct PHP object injection attacks via

CVE-2024-4443 CRITICAL POC
9.8 May 22

The Business Directory Plugin - Easy Listing Directories for WordPress plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to time-based

CVE-2024-1698 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Feb 27

SQL injection in the NotificationX WordPress plugin (versions up to and including 2.8.2) allows unauthenticated remote a

CVE-2023-6875 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jan 11

The POST SMTP Mailer - Email log, Delivery Failure Notifications and Best Mail SMTP for WordPress plugin for WordPress i

CVE-2024-1512 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Feb 17

The MasterStudy LMS WordPress Plugin - for Online Courses and Education plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to union base

CVE-2024-4295 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jun 05

The Email Subscribers by Icegram Express plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to SQL Injection via the ‘hash’ parameter in

CVE-2024-50498 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Oct 28

Remote code execution in the WP Query Console WordPress plugin (versions up to and including 1.0) by Ajit Bohra allows u

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy