Skip to main content

Premium Blocks CVE-2026-94118

| EUVDEUVD-2026-85471 MEDIUM
Cross-site Scripting (XSS) (CWE-79)
2026-09-23 Patchstack GHSA-3mrj-f84p-fphg
6.5
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: Patchstack
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain Contributor account on target site
  2. Delivery
    Inject script into vulnerable block attribute
  3. Exploit
    Submit post for review/preview
  4. Execution
    Admin or editor opens content in wp-admin
  5. Persist
    Payload executes in privileged session
  6. Impact
    Steal session tokens or perform admin actions

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Output encoding, context-aware escaping
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Requires an authenticated WordPress account with at least Contributor privileges on a site running Premium Blocks - Gutenberg Blocks for WordPress version 2.3.17 or earlier. Exploitation is gated by user interaction (UI:R): a higher-privileged user such as an editor or administrator must view or preview the attacker's injected block content in wp-admin for the stored script to execute. Practical limiting factors are the need for a foothold account (sites with closed registration or no untrusted authors are largely insulated) and the victim-interaction requirement; there is no unauthenticated path.

Impact

This is a moderate-severity stored/contributor Cross-Site Scripting flaw (CWE-79) in a WordPress block plugin, scored 6.5 by the vendor with vector CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L. The key risk-limiting signals are PR:L (an authenticated Contributor-level account is required) and UI:R (a victim - typically an editor or administrator - must view the injected content for the payload to fire). No EPSS score is provided, there is no CISA KEV listing, and no public proof-of-concept is referenced (the only reference is the Patchstack advisory), so this is 'no public exploit identified at time of analysis.' The S:C (scope change) reflects that script executing in a higher-privileged user's authenticated browser session crosses a trust boundary, but real-world impact is bounded to C:L/I:L/A:L. Overall this is a real but low-urgency issue: it is not a high-CVSS-but-fictional problem, yet it is far from a mass-exploitation candidate because it needs a foothold account plus victim interaction. The A:L component is questionable for a reflected/stored XSS and is likely vendor over-scoring; realistic impact is confidentiality/integrity of the admin session, not availability. Prioritize patching on multi-author sites where untrusted Contributor accounts exist; deprioritize on single-author/closed-registration sites.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who holds (or registers for) a Contributor account on a WordPress site running Premium Blocks ≤ 2.3.17 crafts a post or block containing a malicious script payload in an inadequately sanitized block attribute. When an editor or administrator previews or opens that content in wp-admin, the script executes in their authenticated browser session, enabling session/cookie theft or admin-context actions. No public PoC is referenced, and exploitation requires the low-privilege account plus victim interaction (UI:R).

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
No patch listed yet 0.2% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Sep 23, 2026

Stored cross-site scripting in the Premium Blocks - Gutenberg Blocks for WordPress plugin (versions up to and including 2.3.17) lets an authenticated Contributor-level user inject persistent JavaScript into block content that executes when a higher-privileged editor or administrator later views or previews that content in wp-admin. Exploitation requires a foothold account with Contributor privileges and victim interaction (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N, 6.5), with low confidentiality and integrity impact and no availability impact; sites that do not accept untrusted author accounts are largely insulated. No public exploit code and no confirmed active exploitation were identified at time of analysis, and no vendor-released patch version is specified in the available intelligence.

RemediationAI

No vendor-released patch version is identified in the available intelligence at time of analysis, so administrators should check the Patchstack advisory and the plugin's WordPress.org page regularly and apply the fixed release immediately once it is published (upgrade beyond 2.3.17 to the patched version). In the interim, reduce the attack surface by disabling or removing the Premium Blocks - Gutenberg Blocks for WordPress plugin if it is not business-critical; if it must remain, restrict or eliminate Contributor-level accounts on the site, disable open user registration and any untrusted author onboarding, and audit existing Contributor-authored drafts for injected script content before editors or administrators preview them. Additional compensating controls include removing the Contributor role's capability to use the affected blocks, deploying a web application firewall rule set that filters XSS patterns in block or post-save requests (trade-off: may cause false positives on legitimate rich content), and advising privileged users not to preview or open untrusted contributor drafts until the plugin is updated. Each of these mitigations is temporary and does not fully eliminate the flaw, so the definitive remediation is installing the vendor's fixed plugin version once it is available; reference the Patchstack advisory for update status and further details.

Affected VersionsENISA

Premium Blocks – Gutenberg Blocks for WordPress n/a ≤2.3.17

Affected Packages

euvd premium_blocks_gutenberg_blocks_for_wordpress no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The affected component is a WordPress Gutenberg block plugin, Premium Blocks - Gutenberg Blocks for WordPress (vendor leap13), identified by the CPE string cpe:2.3:a:leap13:premium_blocks_-_gutenberg_blocks_for_wordpress:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*. The root cause is CWE-79 (Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation, i.e., Cross-Site Scripting): user-supplied block attributes or content are stored and later rendered without sufficient output escaping or sanitization in the administrative context. Because WordPress grants Contributor accounts the ability to create and save post content, but not publish it, a Contributor can inject the payload into a draft or pending post's block data; when an editor or administrator opens the preview or editor view, the script executes in their browser session. The scope-change rating (S:C) reflects that the injected script executes in the higher-privileged user's authenticated wp-admin context, enabling actions with that user's privileges, though the assessed confidentiality and integrity impact remains low and availability is unaffected. The vulnerability is submitted to WordPress by authenticated users (PR:L) and is gated by victim interaction (UI:R), so it is a stored, cross-privilege XSS rather than an unauthenticated remote code execution issue.

Know when Wordpress Plugin gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (Patchstack) PRIMARY 6.5 MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
vuln.today AI 5.4 MEDIUM

Contributor account gives PR:L, admin must view content so UI:R, script in privileged session crosses trust boundary S:C with C:L/I:L; XSS does not cause availability loss so A:N.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (Patchstack).

CVSS VectorVendor: Patchstack

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

DescriptionCVE.org

Contributor Cross Site Scripting (XSS) in Premium Blocks - Gutenberg Blocks for WordPress <= 2.3.17 versions.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.2%
Top 94% exploitable
Prevalence
Low
niche third-party WordPress Gutenberg block plugin, limited install base
Data Quality
4 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.2%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact· derived
Medium
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

32
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +32
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Cross-Site Scripting occurs when an application accepts untrusted data and sends it to a web browser without proper validation or encoding.

CVE-2023-6553 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Dec 15

The Backup Migration plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Remote Code Execution in all versions up to, and including, 1

CVE-2024-5084 CRITICAL POC
9.8 May 23

The Hash Form - Drag & Drop Form Builder plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary file uploads due to missing fil

CVE-2024-44000 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Oct 20

Authentication bypass in the LiteSpeed Cache WordPress plugin (versions prior to 6.5.0.1) allows unauthenticated remote

CVE-2020-36847 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jul 12

The Simple File List plugin for WordPress through version 4.2.2 contains an unauthenticated remote code execution vulner

CVE-2025-11749 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Nov 05

The AI Engine WordPress plugin through version 3.1.3 exposes Bearer Token values through the /mcp/v1/ REST API endpoint

CVE-2025-27007 CRITICAL POC
9.8 May 01

The SureTriggers WordPress plugin through version 1.0.82 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows unaut

CVE-2016-1209 CRITICAL POC
9.8 May 14

The Ninja Forms plugin before 2.9.42.1 for WordPress allows remote attackers to conduct PHP object injection attacks via

CVE-2024-4443 CRITICAL POC
9.8 May 22

The Business Directory Plugin - Easy Listing Directories for WordPress plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to time-based

CVE-2024-1698 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Feb 27

SQL injection in the NotificationX WordPress plugin (versions up to and including 2.8.2) allows unauthenticated remote a

CVE-2023-6875 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jan 11

The POST SMTP Mailer - Email log, Delivery Failure Notifications and Best Mail SMTP for WordPress plugin for WordPress i

CVE-2024-1512 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Feb 17

The MasterStudy LMS WordPress Plugin - for Online Courses and Education plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to union base

CVE-2024-4295 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jun 05

The Email Subscribers by Icegram Express plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to SQL Injection via the ‘hash’ parameter in

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy