Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessCraft link with payload in evf_toast_type and valid atob() evf_toast
-
ExploitTrick authenticated user into clicking link
-
ExecutionUnsanitized value reflected into page
-
ImpactArbitrary script executes in victim's browser session
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Output encoding, context-aware escaping
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Execution The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Requires that the Everest Forms plugin (version ≤ 3.6.2) be installed and active, and that an attacker lure a user into clicking a crafted link (UI:R) - reflected XSS is not self-triggering. The payload is injected via the 'evf_toast_type' parameter handled in the plugin's admin assets JavaScript (admin.js toast handling), and the sibling 'evf_toast' parameter must base64-decode successfully via atob(), which the description states is a trivially attacker-controlled prerequisite that does not meaningfully limit exploitation. No authentication is needed to craft or deliver the link (PR:N). The practical limiting factors are the need for victim interaction and the reflected (per-request, non-persistent) nature of the flaw, meaning impact is scoped to users who click the attacker's URL rather than all site visitors. |
| Impact | This is a reflected XSS (CWE-79) scored CVSS 6.1 with vector CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N - network-reachable and unauthenticated (PR:N), low complexity (AC:L), but gated on user interaction (UI:R), with limited confidentiality/integrity impact and a changed scope reflecting execution in the victim's browser context. The vuln.today decision label is 'this_month' rather than act_now/emergency, consistent with a reflected (not stored) client-side flaw that needs social engineering. No CISA KEV listing is present in the input (not confirmed actively exploited), and no EPSS score was supplied, so widespread automated exploitation cannot be asserted or ruled out from the data given. No public exploit or PoC reference is present - the references are a Wordfence advisory and WordPress trac source/changeset links, not weaponized exploit code. Net assessment: a genuine but moderate-priority issue - real because it is unauthenticated and trivially triggerable per the description, but bounded because it is reflected and requires tricking a user into clicking an attacker-crafted link. Treat as a this-month patch item, not a drop-everything emergency, absent any KEV/EPSS signal to the contrary. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An unauthenticated attacker crafts a URL to a site running Everest Forms with a malicious script in the 'evf_toast_type' parameter and a companion 'evf_toast' value that base64-decodes via atob(). When a logged-in user (e.g., an administrator) is lured into clicking the link, the unsanitized value is reflected and the injected script executes in their browser session. No public exploit code is referenced, but the described trigger is straightforward. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 29, 2026
Reflected cross-site scripting (CWE-79) in the Everest Forms WordPress plugin affects all versions up to and including 3.6.2, where the 'evf_toast_type' parameter is handled by the plugin's admin JavaScript without sufficient sanitization or output escaping. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N, score 6.1) shows the flaw is network-reachable and requires no authentication to craft or deliver a malicious link, but exploitation is gated on user interaction - a victim must be tricked into clicking the attacker's URL, and the injected script then runs in that user's browser session within the site's origin (changed scope). A sibling 'evf_toast' parameter must base64-decode successfully via atob(), a trivially attacker-controlled prerequisite that does not meaningfully limit exploitation; there is no confirmed CISA KEV entry and no public exploit code identified at time of analysis, and the flaw is reflected and per-request rather than persistent.
RemediationAI
The supplied references point to an upstream code change in the plugin trunk (changeset 3704878, https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset/3704878/everest-forms/trunk/assets/js/admin/admin.js), so an upstream fix exists; however no tagged patched release version is confirmed in the available data, so administrators should track the Everest Forms plugin changelog and the Wordfence advisory (https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/8a017198-daf1-4779-a101-dc539e263e50?source=cve) and update as soon as a release later than 3.6.2 ships, then verify the installed version is above 3.6.2. No vendor-documented workaround is provided in the references; the practical exposure limit is that the flaw is reflected and depends on a victim clicking an attacker-supplied link, so exploitation cannot occur without that interaction, and the plugin's admin JavaScript handling of the evf_toast_type parameter is the code path that must be corrected rather than something configurable on the site side.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The issue is a classic CWE-79 cross-site scripting weakness in a WordPress plugin: user-supplied input reaching the page through the 'evf_toast_type' request parameter is written into the DOM by the plugin's admin-side JavaScript (assets/js/admin/admin.js, toast handling around lines 22 and 91 in the 3.6.1 tag) without adequate encoding, so markup supplied by an attacker is interpreted by the browser as script rather than text. The enqueue path for that script is registered in includes/admin/class-evf-admin-assets.php (line 376 of the 3.6.1 tag). The slightly unusual wrinkle is a second parameter, 'evf_toast', which must be decodable by the JavaScript atob() base64 routine before the toast rendering path is reached; per the reported analysis this is trivially satisfied by the attacker and is not a real barrier. Because the payload is reflected in the response rather than stored, each exploitation is a one-shot lure, and because the script executes in the victim's browser within the WordPress site's origin, the CVSS scope is marked Changed (S:C) with low confidentiality and integrity impact; the affected CPE is the wpeverest Everest Forms plugin distribution covering versions through 3.6.2.
Know when Wordpress Plugin gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Unauthenticated remote reflected XSS (AV:N/PR:N); the atob() prerequisite is attacker-controlled so AC:L; a victim must click a link (UI:R); script runs in the browser crossing to the user's context (S:C) with limited C/I and no availability impact.
Primary rating from Vendor (Wordfence).
CVSS VectorVendor: Wordfence
DescriptionCVE.org
The Everest Forms - Contact Form, Payment Form, Quiz, Survey & Custom Form Builder with AI plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Reflected Cross-Site Scripting via the 'evf_toast_type' parameter in all versions up to, and including, 3.6.2 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that execute if they can successfully trick a user into performing an action such as clicking on a link. Exploitation requires the sibling evf_toast parameter to decode successfully via atob(), but this is a trivially attacker-controlled prerequisite.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Cross-Site Scripting occurs when an application accepts untrusted data and sends it to a web browser without proper validation or encoding.
More in Wordpress Plugin
View allThe Backup Migration plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Remote Code Execution in all versions up to, and including, 1
The Hash Form - Drag & Drop Form Builder plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary file uploads due to missing fil
Authentication bypass in the LiteSpeed Cache WordPress plugin (versions prior to 6.5.0.1) allows unauthenticated remote
The Simple File List plugin for WordPress through version 4.2.2 contains an unauthenticated remote code execution vulner
The AI Engine WordPress plugin through version 3.1.3 exposes Bearer Token values through the /mcp/v1/ REST API endpoint
The SureTriggers WordPress plugin through version 1.0.82 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows unaut
The Ninja Forms plugin before 2.9.42.1 for WordPress allows remote attackers to conduct PHP object injection attacks via
The Business Directory Plugin - Easy Listing Directories for WordPress plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to time-based
SQL injection in the NotificationX WordPress plugin (versions up to and including 2.8.2) allows unauthenticated remote a
The POST SMTP Mailer - Email log, Delivery Failure Notifications and Best Mail SMTP for WordPress plugin for WordPress i
The MasterStudy LMS WordPress Plugin - for Online Courses and Education plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to union base
The Email Subscribers by Icegram Express plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to SQL Injection via the ‘hash’ parameter in
EUVD-2026-112687
GHSA-883r-xqxq-wq5r
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB