Skip to main content

EWWW Image Optimizer CVE-2026-91011

| EUVDEUVD-2026-81354 MEDIUM
Cross-site Scripting (XSS) (CWE-79)
2026-09-17 WPScan GHSA-5c4g-pv82-qr56
6.8
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: WPScan
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain author-level WordPress account
  2. Delivery
    Publish content with malicious image attribute payload
  3. Exploit
    Plugin rewrites output without escaping, storing JS
  4. Execution
    Victim (or admin) views affected page
  5. Persist
    Script executes in victim browser
  6. Impact
    Session hijack / admin-context actions

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Output encoding, context-aware escaping
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Requires an authenticated WordPress account with author-level capability or higher (ability to publish content) on a site running EWWW Image Optimizer before 8.7.7 - this is the plugin's default output-rewriting behavior, no special feature toggle is named. Exploitation is stored/second-order: it also requires a victim to subsequently view the affected published page (UI:R) for the injected JavaScript to execute. Limiting factors: attacker must already hold a publishing role (not open to anonymous visitors), the payload only fires on victim page view, and impact is confined to the browser context of viewers (highest value when an administrator views the page, yielding potential account takeover).

Impact

This is a mid-severity stored XSS (CWE-79) whose real-world priority is moderate, not high. The vendor CVSS of 6.8 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H) appears inflated on two counts: (1) PR:H is wrong - the description explicitly requires only 'author-level access and above', which is a low-privilege contributor/author role, so PR:L is more accurate; and (2) the C:H/I:H/A:H triad overstates impact for a stored XSS that runs in a viewer's browser - standard scoring is a scope change with limited impact (S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N). A public POC exists (WPScan), which raises practical risk, but a POC is NOT active exploitation - status is 'publicly available exploit code exists'. No EPSS score and no KEV listing were provided, so there is no evidence of widespread or confirmed exploitation. The exploit requires an attacker to already hold a publishing account (author+) AND a victim to view the poisoned page (UI:R), which meaningfully limits opportunistic mass-exploitation. Net: patch on a normal cadence; elevate only if untrusted users hold author roles.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who holds (or phishes/registers into) an author-level account on a WordPress site running EWWW Image Optimizer < 8.7.7 publishes content containing an image whose attribute values carry a crafted JavaScript payload. Because the plugin rewrites page output without escaping those attribute values, the script is stored in the published page and executes in the browser of any later visitor - including an administrator reviewing the content, enabling session/cookie theft or admin-context actions. A public POC is available via WPScan.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
Patch available 0.2% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Sep 17, 2026

Stored cross-site scripting in EWWW Image Optimizer before 8.7.7 allows authenticated users with author-level or higher publishing rights to inject arbitrary JavaScript through unescaped image attribute values, which is stored in published content and executes when another user views the affected page. Publicly available exploit code exists, but exploitation is second-order and requires a victim to visit the poisoned page; the independent assessment rates this as a moderate-priority stored XSS because the attacker must already hold a publishing role and the impact is limited to the viewer's browser context, with possible account takeover if an administrator is the victim.

RemediationAI

Upgrade EWWW Image Optimizer to 8.7.7 or later; vendor-released patch: 8.7.7. If upgrading cannot be performed immediately, deactivate the plugin to eliminate the vulnerable output-rewriting behavior, accepting the side effect of losing image optimization. Restrict author-level and higher WordPress accounts to trusted users and audit already-published posts for suspicious image attributes, since the XSS is stored and may persist in existing content. A web application firewall or Content Security Policy can reduce execution risk, but a WAF may not inspect every stored-content path and CSP may break legitimate scripts or images. Reference advisories: WPScan (https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/334f14d5-f97b-4ec5-9b42-bb0803ae1668/), NVD (https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-91011), and VulDB (https://vuldb.com/vuln/406327).

Affected VersionsENISA

EWWW Image Optimizer 0 <8.7.7

Affected Packages

euvd ewww_image_optimizer fix: 8.7.7

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

EWWW Image Optimizer is a WordPress plugin that rewrites page output, typically to optimize images. The vulnerability is CWE-79 improper neutralization of input during web page generation: the plugin fails to escape image attribute values when it rewrites output, so content contributed by an authenticated author or higher can persist malicious JavaScript in a published post. The CPE entry cpe:2.3:a:unknown:ewww_image_optimizer:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* identifies the affected product, with affected versions before 8.7.7 (EUVD range: 0 <8.7.7). Exploitation is stored/second-order and requires user interaction when a later visitor views the page; the assessed vector CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N reflects network reachability, low privileges, required victim interaction, scope change, and limited confidentiality/integrity impact, with no availability impact. No special plugin feature toggle is named in the available data.

Know when Ewww Image Optimizer gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (WPScan) PRIMARY 6.8 MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 5.4 MEDIUM

Author role = PR:L (not PR:H); stored XSS executes in a separate victim browser context (S:C) with limited C:L/I:L, no availability impact, and victim page view = UI:R.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (WPScan).

CVSS VectorVendor: WPScan

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
High
User Interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Lifecycle Timeline

4
CVSS changed
Sep 17, 2026 - 13:22 NVD
6.8 (MEDIUM)
Patch available
Sep 17, 2026 - 07:00 EUVD
CVE Published
Sep 17, 2026 - 06:00 cve.org
UNKNOWN (no severity yet)
CVE Published
Sep 17, 2026 - 06:00 cve.org
MEDIUM 6.8

DescriptionCVE.org

The EWWW Image Optimizer WordPress plugin before 8.7.7 does not properly escape image attribute values when it rewrites page output, allowing authenticated users with author-level access and above to inject arbitrary JavaScript that is stored in published content and executes in the browser of any user who later views the affected page.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.2%
Top 85% exploitable
Prevalence
Medium
very popular WordPress image-optimization plugin, ~1M+ active installs
Exploit
POC
Public exploit code exists
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC Yes
EPSS 0.2%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact· derived
Medium
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

54
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +34
PoC: +20
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Cross-Site Scripting occurs when an application accepts untrusted data and sends it to a web browser without proper validation or encoding.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy