Severity by source
AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
AC:H reflects the required conjunction of AppArmor enforcing, active profile, and concurrent profile-management timing; PR:L for unprivileged local process; C/I/A:H for UAF with privilege escalation potential.
Primary rating from Vendor (Linux).
CVSS VectorVendor: Linux
Lifecycle Timeline
6DescriptionCVE.org
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
apparmor: fix cred UAF caused by begin_current_label_crit_section()
AppArmor's begin_current_label_crit_section() is a scary function called from lots of LSM hooks (in particular VFS/socket-related ones) that checks if the label referenced by the current creds is marked FLAG_STALE, and if so, attempts to use aa_replace_current_label() to replace the creds with an updated version that uses a new label.
The first problem with this is that it would directly lead to UAF of struct cred if anything in the kernel takes a pointer to the current creds and accesses these past a security hook invocation that replaces creds, like so:
const struct cred *cred = current_cred();
alloc_file_pseudo(...);
uid_t uid = cred->euid;I don't know if anything in the kernel actually does this, but I think it is very surprising that this pattern could lead to UAF.
The second problem is that things go wrong when aa_replace_current_label() runs with overridden credentials. aa_replace_current_label() bails out if current_cred() != current_real_cred() (mirroring the check in proc_pid_attr_write()), but this check can't actually reliably detect overridden credentials because the overridden creds can be the same as the objective creds.
So in approximately the following scenario, things go wrong:
- task begins with <creds A> (as both objective and subjective creds),
with refcount=2
- task grabs an extra reference on <creds A> for overriding
- task calls override_creds(<creds A>), which returns a pointer to the old
subjective creds (<creds A>)
- task enters AppArmor LSM hook
- AppArmor checks that objective/subjective creds are equal
- AppArmor replaces both cred pointers with <creds B> and drops 2 refs on
<creds A>
- task leaves AppArmor LSM hook
- task calls revert_creds(<creds A>)
- now task->cred is <creds A> while task->real_cred is <creds B>, but the
task_struct logically holds two references to <creds B>
- another task drops the extra reference on <creds A> that was used for
overriding, refcount drops to 0
- now task->real_cred points to freed creds
At this point, any access to current_cred() will be UAF.
I have a test case where I run aa-disable on a profile while a process using that profile is blocked on splice() from a FUSE passthrough file into a full pipe; after the profile update, the pipe becomes empty, splice() resumes, the credentials go out of sync, and a subsequent getuid() syscall results in a KASAN UAF splat.
To fix this, instead of directly replacing creds, do it via task_work that will run at the end of the current syscall. (The point in time at which the cred replacement happens should have no correctness impact; it is just a performance optimization to avoid unnecessarily touching the refcount of the new label.)
Note that AppArmor still performs direct cred replacements in the sb_pivotroot LSM hook after this change, and that direct cred replacements can still happen in VFS ->write() callbacks via proc_pid_attr_write().
There are two options for what to do with aa_dup_task_ctx(): Either explicitly reset new->label_replacement_pending after the entire aa_task_ctx has been copied, or switch to manually copying members over. I am switching to manually copying members over because that should make bugs more obvious.
AnalysisAI
AppArmor's begin_current_label_crit_section() in the Linux kernel contains a use-after-free of struct cred that can be triggered on systems with active AppArmor profiles when those profiles are updated or disabled mid-syscall. The flaw arises from synchronous credential replacement inside LSM hooks: the override_creds() guard in aa_replace_current_label() fails to detect when overridden and objective credentials are the same object, causing two reference drops that free the struct cred while task_struct still holds a pointer to it. …
Unlock full vulnerability intelligence
- Risk assessment & exploitation conditions
- Attack chain visualization
- Remediation with exact patch versions
- Threat intelligence from 22 sources
- Personal watchlist & email alerts
Free forever · No credit card required
Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata
Vulnerability AssessmentAI
| Exploitation | Exploitation requires all of the following: AppArmor compiled into the kernel and in enforcing mode (default on Ubuntu, Debian, openSUSE; not present by default on RHEL/Fedora using SELinux); the target process must be running under an active, enforcing AppArmor profile; a privileged user (root or CAP_MAC_ADMIN) must simultaneously update, reload, or disable that profile using aa-disable or apparmor_parser -r, creating a FLAG_STALE label; and the target process must be mid-execution in a syscall path that invokes an AppArmor LSM hook inside an override_creds() context where the overriding credentials are identical to the objective credentials. … Additional conditions and limiting factors are described in the full assessment. |
| Risk Assessment | The vendor-assigned CVSS 7.8 (AV:L/AC:L/PR:L) overstates attack complexity: successfully triggering the UAF requires AppArmor to be compiled in and enforcing, the target process to be confined under an active profile, a privileged administrator to concurrently reload or disable that profile (creating FLAG_STALE), and the process to be inside a specific syscall path involving override_creds() with identical credential objects - a narrow and timing-sensitive intersection of conditions that justifies AC:H over AC:L. … Full risk analysis with EPSS, KEV, and SSVC signal comparison available after sign-in. |
| Exploit Scenario | Full exploit scenario with step-by-step reproduction available after sign-in. |
| Remediation | Update the Linux kernel to a patched stable release: 6.12.109, 6.18.50, 7.2.4, or apply the 7.3-rc1 mainline fix. … Detailed patch versions, workarounds, and compensating controls in full report. |
Recommended ActionAI
Within 24 hours, audit your Linux infrastructure to identify systems with AppArmor enabled (check /sys/module/apparmor or aa-status output) and assess which are business-critical. …
Sign in for detailed remediation steps and compensating controls.
Threat intelligence, references, and detailed analysis are available after sign-in.
Share
External POC / Exploit Code
Leaving vuln.today
EUVD-2026-76674
GHSA-p69h-p269-mrvc