Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessIdentify site running ASPL Product Quotation ≤1.1.0
-
ExploitSend crafted request with malicious SQL in vulnerable parameter
-
ExecutionInjection executes against backend database
-
ImpactExfiltrate arbitrary data (users, hashes, secrets)
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Parameterized queries, prepared statements
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Persistence The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | The target site must have the ASPL Product Quotation WordPress plugin installed and active at version 1.1.0 or earlier; the description does not name the specific vulnerable parameter or endpoint, but states the injection is reachable by unauthenticated attackers with no special configuration mentioned. Per the CVSS vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N), no authentication, elevated privileges, or user interaction is required and exploitation works against the standard plugin install. The primary limiting factor is deployment scope - exploitation is only possible where this specific, relatively uncommon plugin is present and not yet updated; impact is confined to confidentiality (read-only data disclosure), with no stated write/integrity or availability effect. |
| Impact | Multiple signals align toward genuine priority but with important caveats. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N) describes network-reachable, low-complexity, unauthenticated exploitation requiring no user interaction - the worst-case access profile - and the C:H/I:N/A:N impact plus S:C scope change yields the 8.6 (High) score. The flaw is an unauthenticated SQL injection (CWE-89) and publicly available exploit code exists (reported by WPScan), so the barrier to weaponization is already low. However, no CISA KEV listing is present and no EPSS score was supplied in the input, so there is no direct evidence of active exploitation or a quantified probability - POC availability must NOT be conflated with in-the-wild use. The key mitigating signal is prevalence: ASPL Product Quotation is a niche WordPress plugin, so even with a high CVSS and a public POC, the real-world blast radius is likely limited to the relatively small population of sites running it. Net assessment: a real, patch-worthy issue for any organization running this specific plugin (unauthenticated data disclosure with public exploit), but not a broad internet-wide emergency given the limited deployment footprint. Missing data to verify: EPSS probability and any KEV/active-exploitation confirmation. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | A remote, unauthenticated attacker sends a crafted HTTP request to a vulnerable WordPress site, injecting SQL through the unsanitized parameter in the ASPL Product Quotation plugin (≤1.1.0). Because AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N, no credentials or victim interaction are needed, and the attacker extracts arbitrary database contents such as user records and password hashes. Public exploit code exists (WPScan), lowering the skill required to reproduce the attack. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 11, 2026
Unauthenticated SQL injection in the ASPL Product Quotation WordPress plugin through version 1.1.0 allows remote attackers to read arbitrary data from the site's database without credentials or user interaction. Publicly available exploit code exists (reported via the WPScan vulnerability entry), but the flaw is not flagged as confirmed actively exploited (CISA KEV). Per the assessed vector (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N, 8.6), impact is confidentiality-only - injected queries can disclose data but do not modify it or affect site availability.
RemediationAI
The supplied intelligence does not include a vendor-announced fix version, so no patched release can be cited: treat this as no vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis, and verify current status against the WPScan record (https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/9194818b-75c8-40f0-baba-6dc84d2cfe7d/) and the VulDB advisory (https://vuldb.com/vuln/416538) before acting. Where the plugin's quoting functionality is not in active use, the most direct mitigation is to deactivate and delete it - this fully removes the attack surface but removes its features; if it remains operationally required, restrict access as tightly as the site's design allows (for example, blocking the plugin's endpoints at the perimeter or requiring authentication at the reverse proxy), accepting the trade-off that this may break legitimate public-facing quotation submissions. Deploy virtual patching at a WAF or reverse proxy that inspects attacker-controlled parameters for SQL metacharacters and union/boolean-based patterns, recognizing that signature bypasses are possible and rule tuning is required to avoid false positives. Because the injection is read-only, rotate database credentials used by WordPress and review database and web server logs for anomalous query patterns or unexpected large result sets; no integrity or availability impact is assessed, so no data-restoration action is indicated.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The issue is a classic CWE-89 SQL injection in a WordPress plugin. ASPL Product Quotation accepts a request parameter and interpolates it directly into a database query (typically via the WordPress $wpdb abstraction) without sanitization or escaping, so attacker-supplied SQL fragments are interpreted as query syntax rather than data. Because the plugin runs on top of the WordPress core database layer, successful injection can read from any table the WordPress database user can access, including wp_users and plugin-specific tables. The CVSS vector rates network reachability with low complexity (AV:N/AC:L), no privileges (PR:N) and no user interaction (UI:N); the Scope:Changed rating (S:C) reflects that the vulnerable component is the plugin while the impacted component is the underlying database/site, and the C:H/I:N/A:N profile confirms a read-only disclosure impact. The provided CPE (cpe:2.3:a:unknown:aspl_product_quotation:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*) maps the plugin to an unassigned vendor namespace, so version coverage beyond 'through 1.1.0' is not reliably enumerable from CPE data alone; EUVD separately records the affected range as ASPL Product Quotation 0 through 1.1.0.
Know when Aspl Product Quotation gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Unauthenticated network SQLi with no interaction gives AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N; database is a separate authority so S:C, and the flaw only reads data so C:H/I:N/A:N.
Primary rating from Vendor (WPScan).
CVSS VectorVendor: WPScan
Lifecycle Timeline
3DescriptionCVE.org
The ASPL Product Quotation WordPress plugin through 1.1.0 does not sanitize and escape a parameter before using it in SQL statements, allowing unauthenticated attackers to perform SQL injection and read arbitrary data from the database.
Technical POC Analysis
Evidence caveat up front: the only supplied source is the WPScan entry (WPVDB ID 9194818b-75c8-40f0-baba-6dc84d2cfe7d).
Full technical POC analysis - root cause, step-by-step exploitation and patch breakdown - is part of the Pro and Business plans.
Executive ViewAI
The ASPL Product Quotation WordPress plugin (through version 1.1.0) contains an unauthenticated SQL injection flaw that lets any remote attacker read arbitrary data from a site's database without credentials or user interaction. Public exploit code is available and no vendor patch has been released, putting every organization that runs this plugin on an internet-facing WordPress site at direct risk of sensitive data exposure. Because exploitation requires no authentication and can disclose customer, credential, or regulated data, leadership should treat this as an urgent business risk requiring immediate mitigation.
No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis; interim mitigations include immediately deactivating or removing the ASPL Product Quotation plugin version 1.1.0 and earlier, deploying WAF virtual patching to block SQL injection attempts against the plugin, restricting access to affected WordPress sites, monitoring database and web logs for exploitation indicators, and rotating database credentials as a precaution.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
SQL injection exploits the way applications construct database queries by mixing user input directly into SQL statements.
EUVD-2026-96787
GHSA-3vj4-c3hx-33mx
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
VulDB
Exploit-DB